Pokemon X and Y

Recommended Videos

Enlong

New member
Dec 24, 2008
185
0
0
Slow? Bwahahaha!

Play Diamond if you want freaking slow.

With the addition of icons to show the weather instead of informing us every round, as well as flash-up icons for Abilities instead of entire windows, the action's never been faster.

And there's always turning off the animations if you really need it any faster for whatever reason.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Spambot 3000 said:
theultimateend said:
Spambot 3000 said:
theultimateend said:
Spambot 3000 said:
TheKasp said:
Spambot 3000 said:
Are there actually any other new pokemon apart from the 3 starters and the two legendaries? Because that footage didn't show any other pokemon apart from them at all. Mind you, if they didn't introduce another 100 I'd be mighty pleased with that. I'm just wondering.
They always only show the starters first. But by rule of thumb: New Gen = New critters.

Edit: The footage also shows the new legendaries.
I see, well ... it should be alright I suppose. Can't say the water type starter looks appealing but I still feel optimistic about this one.
Frogbert will crush your team.

You just wait! >: (
What the ... *reads through thread*
Why do so many people like the frog? I just ... NO. Come on guys, where is your taste?!
Subjectively I find the Fox to be the best option.

But I don't pick the best option.

I pick the most unloved and dorky ones.

I non-ironically loved Mudkip.
Okay, if that's your method for picking starters then that's understandable. However, Mudkip is truly the Chuck Norris of the Pokemon universe.
I've wondered if people actually don't like bidoof or if its just a meme.

Because his character design is fantastic. Plus he can handle just about any HM so if you are traveling he's a utility pokemon.

And yeah I agree, Mudkip becomes obscenely powerful. Water/Ground is insanity.

"Go Grass pokemon! You are his weakness!"
*Earthquakes*
"Try again :mad: !!!"
 

Crazie_Guy

New member
Mar 8, 2009
305
0
0
I'm a bit anxious to see how it turns out. I was a huge Pokemon fan but fell out with 5th gen. White version was the first Pokemon game in my life that failed to see over 100 hours, and I never bothered with BW2. Perhaps it was because non of the new Pokemon really worked for me, or more likely because I had become a studied competitive online battler in 4th gen then stopped battling near the end, and now the single player grind is just completely hollow compared to the strategy of real battles.



At any rate I'm hesitant about the move to full 3D. Back when even the DS games were speculative I was staunchly against 3D for 2 reason, first because the old DS's 3D is shit and I didn't want to see clean sprites replaced with the kind of models you would see in something like Yugioh nightmare troubadour, and secondly because 3D battles in an adventure based game as seen on the gamecube titles were slow as balls because everything has to go through its little animation for every single move, not to mention all the wasted moments it took for the camera to just circle the field between rounds. The first concern is more or less gone now with the powerful 3DS being able to put out decent 3D graphics, but the second concern could be a problem.
 

Laluune

New member
Dec 22, 2012
38
0
0
I'm very, very excited for this. It gives new meaning to the 3DS that has been sitting on my shelf gathering dust since ocarina. There's a fan video of pokemon converted to 3D floating around the internet and I remember seeing that and thinking "THIS is where Pokemon needs to go". and I don't mind the designs of the starter pokemon for once. The grass one is meh but Fire and Water look cool. I usually end up just collecting pink pokemon anyway. Don't know why.

And I'll say this. There will totally be a Pokemon Z because... 3D... X, Y... Z axis. Yeah. You know I'm right. I'm really in a strange mood today, sorry.
 

CrazyCapnMorgan

Is not insane, just crazy >:)
Jan 5, 2011
2,742
0
0
Soooooo, I foresee me purchasing a 3DS in the somewhat near future. I hope they have pink colored ones.

Anyhoot, I hope they did the typing like what they did with Gen 4. I love the fact that Empoleon is the only Water/Steel type in the entirety of Pokemon. I choose it almost every time. I'll echo the sentiment that the Fire starter shouldn't be another Fighting dual type; though I hope if they do dual type the starters, it happens to ALL THREE of them.

To date and also outside of legendary Pokemon and alternate forms, they haven't made any Grass/Ghost, Grass/Fire, Grass/Electric or Grass/Dragon dual types.

Nor have they made Fire/Steel, Fire/Poison, Fire/Psychic, Fire/Electric, Fire/Water, Fire/Ice, Fire/Normal or Fire/Dragon dual types.

However, Water has been paired with pretty much every other type in the game, with the sole exception of Water/Fire. Which is not unusual, as Water-types are the most common in the game with 16.8% of all Pokemon having a Water-type affiliation.
 

Tropicaz

New member
Aug 7, 2012
311
0
0
Looks like it's going to be Fire/psychic, grass/dark and water/fighting, so it gives every starter a strength and weakness against the others.
I'll probably get it if 3DSes are about 80 quid by then.
 

Lethos

New member
Dec 9, 2010
529
0
0
mysecondlife said:
Lethos said:
Wow it actually looks really good.

I'm glad the Fire Starter is a fox (or something). I normally always choose the Fire Starter but I didn't in the last gen because I don't like pigs... At least I got a grass snake though.

Actually really excited now XD
For a guy with a pokemon for an avatar, I didn't think you'd use the word 'actually' ...twice.
I liked the latest gens, but I don't think they were as good as Gens 1,2 & 3. So I was kinda surprised that this new one looked so good.
 

The White Hunter

Basment Abomination
Oct 19, 2011
3,888
0
0
acillies45 said:
GET BACK YE O WALL O' TEXT!!
See I can get behind it but the main series does have an enormous following as is, reinventing the series may draw back a few who are burnt out on it, but they tend to return after skipping a few generations and enjoy it once more, I've known a good deal of people who stopped at Crystal who ignored the series until Black & White and loved it once more.

If you changed it to an entirely real time action-rpg you'd probably lose a significant proportion of the current fanbase, which is something nintendo doesn't want to do at all. The portability of the games also adds to their addictiveness for most, personally I just play it curled up in bed :3

I'd like to see more games in the vein of Colosseum and XD on the Wii U or whatever, and then the series continue as it has been on the handhelds, I think thats a good compromise between the two and allows for more experimentation without damaging what makes pokemon so unique.

But as you say, thats life, maybe try skip pokemon for a few generations then puck up a newer one and give it a whirl, it may just suck you back in, but if you don't like it thats fine, the series doesn't need any drastic overhaul to the combat system.

Things that could be streamlined are the transisitons between battles and such though, maybe make wild encounters less of a chore when you're trying to get about, save me spamming super repels....
 

The White Hunter

Basment Abomination
Oct 19, 2011
3,888
0
0
CrazyCapnMorgan said:
Soooooo, I foresee me purchasing a 3DS in the somewhat near future. I hope they have pink colored ones.

Anyhoot, I hope they did the typing like what they did with Gen 4. I love the fact that Empoleon is the only Water/Steel type in the entirety of Pokemon. I choose it almost every time. I'll echo the sentiment that the Fire starter shouldn't be another Fighting dual type; though I hope if they do dual type the starters, it happens to ALL THREE of them.

To date and also outside of legendary Pokemon and alternate forms, they haven't made any Grass/Ghost, Grass/Fire, Grass/Electric or Grass/Dragon dual types.

Nor have they made Fire/Steel, Fire/Poison, Fire/Psychic, Fire/Electric, Fire/Water, Fire/Ice, Fire/Normal or Fire/Dragon dual types.

However, Water has been paired with pretty much every other type in the game, with the sole exception of Water/Fire. Which is not unusual, as Water-types are the most common in the game with 16.8% of all Pokemon having a Water-type affiliation.
I will throw my wallet at nintendo if they give me a grass-dragon starter. Especially if it comes with good speed and learns something like close combat or stone edge for those pesky ice's.
 

SEXTON HALE

New member
Apr 12, 2012
231
0
0
This is really getting me excited,it's been a while since ive played any of the pokemon games but now I think i might revisit a few before jumping into the newer generations.
 

Arqus_Zed

New member
Aug 12, 2009
1,181
0
0
Hahaha, oh my God, I can just see how the development of this game went.

"Alright, so you handful of poor bastards are gonna model, unwrap, texture, rig and skin 650+ individual Pokémon, no matter how crappy the designs are, have fun!"

As for the game itself...
I don't really care. It's still a SMT knock-off (an EXTREMELY geniously marketed knock-off) that has only innovated on the most useless aspects of the series. Add more attack slots? Allow for a combination of multiple passive and active abilities? Implement a fusion mechanism? Hah, what silly ideas! Let's put in a beauty contest instead! And while we're at it, let's release every installment multiple times without any significant differences, cha-ching!

Yeah, I don't have anything against you kiddies having fun, but I'm gonna stick with Atlus.
 

Enlong

New member
Dec 24, 2008
185
0
0
Arqus_Zed said:
Hahaha, oh my God, I can just see how the development of this game went.

"Alright, so you handful of poor bastards are gonna model, unwrap, texture, rig and skin 650+ individual Pokémon, no matter how crappy the designs are, have fun!"

As for the game itself...
I don't really care. It's still a SMT knock-off (an EXTREMELY geniously marketed knock-off) that has only innovated on the most useless aspects of the series. Add more attack slots? Allow for a combination of multiple passive and active abilities? Implement a fusion mechanism? Hah, what silly ideas! Let's put in a beauty contest instead! And while we're at it, let's release every installment multiple times without any significant differences, cha-ching!

Yeah, I don't have anything against you kiddies having fun, but I'm gonna stick with Atlus.
Oh god, do you have any idea just how much things would change if they added a fifth moveslot? Well, not a WHOLE lot, but things would start to get even more agressive. Pokemon predisposed to being sweepers would have even more space for obscure type-checking moves. Mons that have to choose between one scenario and another since they wat to fill a slot with a move that raises their stats could have their cake and eat it too. Mons that currently fill their entire moveset with the abilities to set up a walling effort would be able to attack at the same time. Not to menion how various new options would bounce off each other in ways I certainly can't predict. Not really sure the game needs to be any more fast-paced and aggressive.

What do you mean by "passive and active"? The Abilities are either constant or triggered by somethhing, if that's what you mean. I kinda like having one Ability to a 'mon, mainly because it gives you a choice o build the guy around. And technically, you can have multiple abiliies, in the form of giving hem a held item.

The legendaries of the last game could fuse, and wha do you call the breeding, if not merging the species of the mother with certain moves from the father?
 

juyunseen

New member
Nov 21, 2011
292
0
0
I was not interested in Black and White, and I thought then that my Pokemon days (silver-diamond) were finally over.
...
...
This shows me that they aren't.

I suppose I need to get a 3DS now huh.
 

TheEvilCheese

Cheesey.
Dec 16, 2008
1,151
0
0
Ok, Legendary names announced as Xerneas and Yveltal over on the pokémon site [http://www.pokemon.com/pokemonxy/en-us/].

I'll add the info to the OP as well.


Boring predictable names? I think so, but I'm sure they'll grow on me.
 

karloss01

New member
Jul 5, 2009
991
0
0
Spambot 3000 said:
Are there actually any other new pokemon apart from the 3 starters and the two legendaries? Because that footage didn't show any other pokemon apart from them at all. Mind you, if they didn't introduce another 100 I'd be mighty pleased with that. I'm just wondering.
most likely will be, they wouldn't want to spoil the fun by showing nothing but new pokemon.

also i find it surprising if they are able to fit all 650+ pokemon on the cartridge, that must take a tonne of space.
 

TheEvilCheese

Cheesey.
Dec 16, 2008
1,151
0
0
karloss01 said:
Spambot 3000 said:
Are there actually any other new pokemon apart from the 3 starters and the two legendaries? Because that footage didn't show any other pokemon apart from them at all. Mind you, if they didn't introduce another 100 I'd be mighty pleased with that. I'm just wondering.
most likely will be, they wouldn't want to spoil the fun by showing nothing but new pokemon.

also i find it surprising if they are able to fit all 650+ pokemon on the cartridge, that must take a tonne of space.
"Game cards for the Nintendo 3DS (CTR-005) are 1 to 8 gigabytes in size" Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_game_card]

We don't know how big the cartridge will be, needless to say, 8 gig is FAR more than enough and the tech is there to support cards that big. The previous DS games have been a couple of hundred MB at most (I think 128MB but I'm not sure).

Maybe the possible size is one of the reasons they wanted it on the 3ds?
 

Evil Smurf

Admin of Catoholics Anonymous
Nov 11, 2011
11,597
0
0
TizzytheTormentor said:
Evil Smurf said:
Damn it! I need to buy a 3DXL now as well as a WiiU. Nintendo/Gamefreak leave my wallet alone, leave my wallet alone you bastards!
Hey, now we can play Pokemon against each other!

How about we trade over all the starter Pokemon with each other when we buy our copies so we level up faster!
Sure man!
 

Arqus_Zed

New member
Aug 12, 2009
1,181
0
0
Enlong said:
Arqus_Zed said:
Hahaha, oh my God, I can just see how the development of this game went.

"Alright, so you handful of poor bastards are gonna model, unwrap, texture, rig and skin 650+ individual Pokémon, no matter how crappy the designs are, have fun!"

As for the game itself...
I don't really care. It's still a SMT knock-off (an EXTREMELY geniously marketed knock-off) that has only innovated on the most useless aspects of the series. Add more attack slots? Allow for a combination of multiple passive and active abilities? Implement a fusion mechanism? Hah, what silly ideas! Let's put in a beauty contest instead! And while we're at it, let's release every installment multiple times without any significant differences, cha-ching!

Yeah, I don't have anything against you kiddies having fun, but I'm gonna stick with Atlus.
Oh god, do you have any idea just how much things would change if they added a fifth moveslot? Well, not a WHOLE lot, but things would start to get even more agressive. Pokemon predisposed to being sweepers would have even more space for obscure type-checking moves. Mons that have to choose between one scenario and another since they wat to fill a slot with a move that raises their stats could have their cake and eat it too. Mons that currently fill their entire moveset with the abilities to set up a walling effort would be able to attack at the same time. Not to menion how various new options would bounce off each other in ways I certainly can't predict. Not really sure the game needs to be any more fast-paced and aggressive.

What do you mean by "passive and active"? The Abilities are either constant or triggered by somethhing, if that's what you mean. I kinda like having one Ability to a 'mon, mainly because it gives you a choice o build the guy around. And technically, you can have multiple abiliies, in the form of giving hem a held item.

The legendaries of the last game could fuse, and wha do you call the breeding, if not merging the species of the mother with certain moves from the father?
Sorry in advance for the wall of text.

1)
You're right, it wouldn't be as easy as just adding one extra slot - in fact, it would be outright lazy. They should update the entire battle system, not just the one extra slot thing.

The way I see it, is that they could trade the "one pokémon at a time"-system with an actual "party"-mechanic. And I'm not talking about those occasional 2-vs-2 pokémon battles they have. What about having three pokémon on the frontline at all times (unless you willfully leave one out). Not only would it create an entirely new layer of depth and options in your tactics, it would also allow for a whole new slew of abilities. Having to take in account the multiple elements on the field, having moves that affect either one or multiple targets, combined attacks, DPS/tank/healer setups, etc. Things would also cease to be as on the nose as "Oh, a water type, better switch to electricity - oh, now he switched to rock, better get out my plant."

Even in wild encounters, instead of going up against one creature, you'll go up against a herd of creatures - that may or may not be of the same species. Maybe if you throw a ball at a weakened entity, you also have to make sure he's alone, or the others standing next to him will slap it away. Thusly, certain encounter combination would force you to seriously revise your tactics if you actually plan on capturing a certain rare creature. (I'd say it be a good idea to drop the silly pokéball mechanic entirely in favor of a system where you actually have to talk, barter and convince to enemy to join your ranks - like SMT - but that might be a stretch to far for the kids.)

Also? Fast-paced? Aggressive? Really? I've played PSOne RPGs that were more fast-paced than Pokémon.

2)
Okay, I didn't really understand what you meant at first with having only one ability on a beast, but now I get that the one unique skill every pokémon has, is simply called "ability". Now, when I'm talking about active abilities, I mean the skills you actually have to select and use in battle, in other words, your "attacks". With passive abilities, I mean the ones that work without manually triggering them, in other words, what Pokémon calls "ability".

Imagine that each pokémon would have six or eight slots that can be filled, but they can be filled with both "attacks" and "abilities". So you would have to divide both active and passive skills over one and the same space. Again, this would add a whole new layer of depth and options in both your actions and the growth of your beasts.

And yeah, I guess there is the whole "hold an item thing". No complaints there. It kind of resembles a stripped down equipment system from other traditional RPGs.

3)
Breeding is good and all in the sense of "hey, if you want all pokémon, you'll also have to breed a few". But it doesn't really have any other purpose. In the original Megaten series, there was no evolution (I actually think Pokémon invented that, but I could be wrong) and demons didn't learn new moves when they leveled, only their stats increases. Now, you might think: "Well, wasn't that a great innovation of Pokémon?"

My answer: yes - and no. The concepts themselves are work fine (many other games like Final Fantasy had already proven that), but they cut the whole "fusion" aspect. What does this mean? simply put: that you have literally hundreds of characters, but that you probably won't use more than ten playing through the game. Why? Because you don't need to, you have your party of varied elements trained and primed to your liking. In Megaten, you were constantly forced to recruit new demons and subsequently fuse them to make sure your party is as strong as it can be. Your allies were constantly changing and it added more variety and tactical diversity, since each fusion would bring his own set of abilities to the table and only take a few from its predecessors.

With the whole breeding thing, you end up with a very low-level creature that is not on par with the others in your party. The breeding takes time, walking around with an egg is a drag, the newborn is useless in battle? Unless you already played out the game and are now trying "to catch 'em all", the system offers little to no advantages.

Also, I have no idea how the whole "fusing of legendaries" works. First thing I hear of that, so I can't really comment on that.
 

EyeReaper

New member
Aug 17, 2011
859
0
0
you know what i want? A new pokemon mystery dungeon, but this time, they remove the personality test, and instead let you pick to play as any basic pokemon, sans legendaries. Wanna be an oddish? be an oddish. wanna be a ralts? be a ralts. Wanna be bidoof, or trubbish? I pity you.
But in all seriousness, thats what they should do. Infact, lets get a new stadium while we are at it.