Andy Chalk said:
There's probably some clinical explanation for how a videogame could both inspire a vicious murder and help the perpetrator forget about it, but Savage gave no indication that the game was anything more than a way to block out the memory of his horrific crime, much the way other people might get drunk out of their heads or immerse themselves in some other activity. Even his lawyer called the videogame link "pure speculation and a rush to judgment." But people like easy answers and in the eyes of the police, at least, it looks like videogames are still a good place to find them.
Okay I hate to argue here. But speaking as a Police Officer, Detective, D&D Player and Video Gamer. I feel like you're using broad strokes to paint 'the police' as the people spearheading this. It's got equal parts media, DA, and glory seeking detectives written all over it.
Firstly, if the guy confessed getting a motive is totally irrelevant in any legal sense. (It does help the victim's families sometimes though). So, I think Tacoma's PD is wasting time... this sounds like the kind of pointless investigation a mayor, city council, or District Attorney LOVVVEESS to force on them. Though you'd never see anything stating "the mayor wants to know why so the community can rest easy" is not going to show up any official report. The big reason they're looking down this avenue is because the kid has NO criminal record. The rarity of suddenly out of the blue becoming a rapist/murder without some documented mental illness or the like is remarkable.
They should be investigating other theories it would be amateur investigation skills to spend the kind of money they are talking about (hiring a psychologist or FBI profiler? Not clear on what the expert is) and not try to make sure it isn't something else. The only reason we're hearing about this theory is because the MEDIA finds it's sensational and they love causing a panic. They don't like to bring up stuff like 'his parents divorced and fought in front of him all the time even in public' or something like that. It's not nearly as interesting. Chances are they wouldn't (and shouldn't) be putting this much time and effort into an already solved crime without something we're not being told.
That being said I assume much here, they could just be, really lousy investigators. Not all of them are going to be greats.