That is what they did...Levitas1234 said:Well that sure is dumb, it's illegal for a teacher to solve the problem in 5 mintutes with a quick backhand but not illegal to pepper spray him.bdcjacko said:Yeah, but teachers aren't allowed to touch children now a days. So if following district policy to keep from being sued is shitless, I guess you have a point.Levitas1234 said:really?HG131 said:The kid was trying to KILL two people. I think they would have been justified if they snapped his arms and legs.
I find this funny, i could imagine all the teachers scared shitless of the little 8 year old, the teachers could of handled it themselves if they weren't so incompetent (lock themselves in a closet, what a joke) those teachers were probably good for nothing nerds anyways who thought they were king of the world.
If i were a teacher, i'd just walk out of the room and lock him in
Yeah. You have to remember that these crazy kids tend to have crazy parents which enable their craziness. I mean Curtis's mom is clearly crazy and won't get a dime because she asks for too much. But this lady with the pepper spray kid, she seems less batshit and more denial and would win a court case.coldfrog said:Oh my god, I can't believe I read more, but wow. He's not a student number, he's not a corporation, he's not a slave of the state. He's my intellectual property. I own him, and all rights to him.bdcjacko said:That is all over somethingawful.com (being that Lowtax is from Kansas City, and this is from Kansas City). Also it just so happens the teacher in question is a client of my office.
This is one of the most awful things I've seen in a long time.
Just taking a stab in the dark, but the answer might be:Levitas1234 said:I don't get why people look so down upon an 8year old who just wanted to kill two teachers
The fun part is if the kid was truly trying to kill people shooting him would have been totally justified.Neuromaster said:What would have been an appropriate level of force?
-Grabbing him, possibly causing lasting physical harm to both the boy and/or the officers?
-Beating him with batons?
-Pepper spraying him?
-Tazering him?
-Shooting him?
Those are pretty much all the options you get. If the kid can't be talked down, what do you do better? I think pepper spray is pretty clearly the lowest level of acceptable force possible that would cause no lasting harm to anyone involved.
yeah, she's a shit parent, but the really spineless people are the 2 teachers. Apparently a fully grown adult can't take a stick out of a child's hand these days. Hell, if they couldn't, the police should have done! christ... this is what happens when kids don't get disciplined these days. it's called being spanked, when it's done to people as children they learn not to do shit.Zetion said:Spineless mom, and the kid would benefit from some old school parenting.
And by that I mean an ass-beating.
Ok, as someone who has a bit of experience in grappling, let me explain something: When there is an overwhelming strength differential between two opponents, as there is between a small child and two grown adults whose job is inherently athletic, the only way you will get contusion injuries is ifravensheart18 said:The question is could they restrain an 8 year old with a weapon and shield without injuring themselves or the child. That is by no means certain.Exosus said:If you, as a grown-ass man, need pepper spray to restrain an EIGHT YEAR OLD WITH A STICK not only should you not be allowed to be a police officer, you should have your balls revoked. The little bastard is 8 years old he probably weighs like 75 pounds and there were 2 cops. Pepper spray was employed because it sounded like fun, no other reason whatsoever.
I can easily see the alternative "Two big strong cops tackle little 8 year old boy leaving him with bruses and sprained arm. Mother complains about police brutality".
Pepper spray creates no real harm, just some temporary discomfort.
Well they had to dose the kid with pepper spray twice to get him down. So point, the kid could have kept fighting no matter the cost. Just saying.Exosus said:Ok, as someone who has a bit of experience in grappling, let me explain something: When there is an overwhelming strength differential between two opponents, as there is between a small child and two grown adults whose job is inherently athletic, the only way you will get contusion injuries is ifravensheart18 said:The question is could they restrain an 8 year old with a weapon and shield without injuring themselves or the child. That is by no means certain.Exosus said:If you, as a grown-ass man, need pepper spray to restrain an EIGHT YEAR OLD WITH A STICK not only should you not be allowed to be a police officer, you should have your balls revoked. The little bastard is 8 years old he probably weighs like 75 pounds and there were 2 cops. Pepper spray was employed because it sounded like fun, no other reason whatsoever.
I can easily see the alternative "Two big strong cops tackle little 8 year old boy leaving him with bruses and sprained arm. Mother complains about police brutality".
Pepper spray creates no real harm, just some temporary discomfort.
A) The person being restrained has no concept of pain and wants to win at any cost (which obviously isn't true or pepper spray would have been laughed off)
B) The person(s) doing the restraining lack the training to know what will and won't cause those sorts of injuries (which obviously isn't true because that is their entire job)
C) The person(s) doing the restraining are intentionally harming the person (which we won't get into)
This is the extent of GSP having an argument with his 16-year-old mail order bride - restraint is not even a contest. They could hold that kid down without trying. That means that there is no danger of contusion injuries, no need for tackling, none of that, unless the cops are so bad at their jobs that they shouldn't be allowed to drive a mail truck. They chose pepper spray to teach him a lesson/have some laughs.
Drakulea said:SNIP
Time to interject. By no means is hitting an 8 year old ok, not like with a hose, but that kid was well, insane. Like instoppable in a fit of rage (not in terms of fighting, but in terms of calming him down). If an 8 year old is attempting to fight two police officers hes going to fight. All the damn way. Imagine if they manhandled him? Imagine if he gouged eyes? The police couldnt touch him, lawsuit walking right there. It wasnt the best option not by a long way.Exosus said:SNIP
Finally someone is talking sense. I agree completely with this. You can't touch children if you want a future.BiscuitTrouser said:Drakulea said:SNIPTime to interject. By no means is hitting an 8 year old ok, not like with a hose, but that kid was well, insane. Like instoppable in a fit of rage (not in terms of fighting, but in terms of calming him down). If an 8 year old is attempting to fight two police officers hes going to fight. All the damn way. Imagine if they manhandled him? Imagine if he gouged eyes? The police couldnt touch him, lawsuit walking right there. It wasnt the best option not by a long way.Exosus said:SNIP
To exo now also:
But if i was a cop, with a family to feed, and the prospect of seeing the headline, "COP BRUTALLY ATTACKS AND BEATS SMALL CHILD AGAINST WALL FOR WAVING A STICK. An insane and blood crazed policeman flew into an animal rage and beat the child screaming obscenities to his dark satanic gods more than likely trying to immolate his living soul in a depraved ritual" just for freakin touching the kid to stop him (this totally happens in USA (uk here)) id resort to something long range, guarenteed to FORCE the child to stop without causing any permenant harm after about 30 mins. Hey look pepper spray...
If you post a link demonstrating that happening in the US and a paypal account, I will send you 100 USD which you may convert into pounds at your convenience.BiscuitTrouser said:Drakulea said:SNIPTime to interject. By no means is hitting an 8 year old ok, not like with a hose, but that kid was well, insane. Like instoppable in a fit of rage (not in terms of fighting, but in terms of calming him down). If an 8 year old is attempting to fight two police officers hes going to fight. All the damn way. Imagine if they manhandled him? Imagine if he gouged eyes? The police couldnt touch him, lawsuit walking right there. It wasnt the best option not by a long way.Exosus said:SNIP
To exo now also:
But if i was a cop, with a family to feed, and the prospect of seeing the headline, "COP BRUTALLY ATTACKS AND BEATS SMALL CHILD AGAINST WALL FOR WAVING A STICK. An insane and blood crazed policeman flew into an animal rage and beat the child screaming obscenities to his dark satanic gods more than likely trying to immolate his living soul in a depraved ritual" just for freakin touching the kid to stop him (this totally happens in USA (uk here)) id resort to something long range, guarenteed to FORCE the child to stop without causing any permenant harm after about 30 mins. Hey look pepper spray...
I was exhaggerating for effect but heres the ideaExosus said:If you post a link demonstrating that happening in the US and a paypal account, I will send you 100 USD which you may convert into pounds at your convenience.BiscuitTrouser said:Drakulea said:SNIPTime to interject. By no means is hitting an 8 year old ok, not like with a hose, but that kid was well, insane. Like instoppable in a fit of rage (not in terms of fighting, but in terms of calming him down). If an 8 year old is attempting to fight two police officers hes going to fight. All the damn way. Imagine if they manhandled him? Imagine if he gouged eyes? The police couldnt touch him, lawsuit walking right there. It wasnt the best option not by a long way.Exosus said:SNIP
To exo now also:
But if i was a cop, with a family to feed, and the prospect of seeing the headline, "COP BRUTALLY ATTACKS AND BEATS SMALL CHILD AGAINST WALL FOR WAVING A STICK. An insane and blood crazed policeman flew into an animal rage and beat the child screaming obscenities to his dark satanic gods more than likely trying to immolate his living soul in a depraved ritual" just for freakin touching the kid to stop him (this totally happens in USA (uk here)) id resort to something long range, guarenteed to FORCE the child to stop without causing any permenant harm after about 30 mins. Hey look pepper spray...
I'm going to assume you see how those two things are completely unrelated, correct?BiscuitTrouser said:I was exhaggerating for effect but heres the idea
http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/news/042310-teacher-fired-after-slap-boxing-video
The student consented to this, the student was PLAYING with the teacher. Imagine if he didnt... it would be even worse. This man is now unemployed. Possibly with a family. Thats the real effect these things have on people.