my fiance went through foster care, it was the worst experience of her life because her foster parents tried to force her to be a girly girl and locked her up in her room if she did anything wrong (which, since they were puritanical christians, EVERYTHING was wrong). She still cries about it to this day.AndyFromMonday said:I'm a bit torn on the issue myself. On one hand the mother did abuse the child in every sense of the way but on the other hand separating a child from its parents is always traumatizing for the child and foster homes aren't always a good thing for the child since adoption rates aren't that high. There's also bullying and acceptance to consider when you throw a child into an already established community.
I already answered this question in my original post. Re-read it please.RAKtheUndead said:She injected a neurotoxin into her daughter's face.
What about that isn't an appalling act of sheer idiocy?
She did what she thought was best for her daugher. She was worried that her daughter might end up like her. She cares deeply for the child and tried to do anything in her mind to help her not end up in a deadbeat job like herself. What she did to the child was wrong but separating the child from the parents should be a last resort.lobster1077 said:Think about it rationally for a moment, botox is a potent neurotoxin, the mother effectively risked her daughter's life to improve the girl's chances of winning a pageant. Perhaps she perceived the injections to be beneficial to her daughter, but that's flimsy justification if you consider the risks.
Because the contest is all about looks over anything else, which isn't a good lesson for a child, and tries to change them into mini-adults, which they aren't. It also tends to breed pushy parents like this mother who project their own insecurities onto their child and place pressure of them to achieve so they can live through them.Father Time said:I fail to see how beauty pageants reinforce that.busterkeatonrules said:Children's beauty pageants should be illegal. Seriously. Teaching young children that unless they happen to look picture-perfect, they're not worth a damn thing. How can anyone fail to see the harm in that?
Don't get me wrong they're incredibly disturbing but I don't see anything morally wrong with them.
Maybe if she hadn't been an idiot she could have kept her kid.AndyFromMonday said:She did what she thought was best for her daugher. She was worried that her daughter might end up like her. She cares deeply for the child and tried to do anything in her mind to help her not end up in a deadbeat job like herself. What she did to the child was wrong but separating the child from the parents should be a last resort.lobster1077 said:Think about it rationally for a moment, botox is a potent neurotoxin, the mother effectively risked her daughter's life to improve the girl's chances of winning a pageant. Perhaps she perceived the injections to be beneficial to her daughter, but that's flimsy justification if you consider the risks.
She got as far as "Magic Wrinkle Cure" in the spam e-mail from the mexican pharmaceuticals supplier...RAKtheUndead said:OK, here's a quick question: Do any of these people realise what botox treatments consist of? Here's a clue, people: It's an extremely deadly neurotoxin that comes from a bacillus bacterium called Clostridium botulinum. Its LD[sub]50[/sub] value is 1ng per kilogram of body mass. That is what she had injected into her daughter.
Moron.