Care to give some examples of this stagnation?dastardly said:We don't "steal." We incorporate things from as wide a variety of cultures as possible. In the end, each is less "pure" and "true to its original," but that's how we keep our bank on influences from growing as stale as some other nations (who foolishly believe that the exact same jokes the exact same way over and over is "tradition" instead of "stagnation.")
No, it's called localisation.It's called localization, folks.
So when Daleks set up shop in Canary Wharf, you wonder why you should care, but when a Goa'uld system lord is found to be operating out of a house in rural Washington state I have no trouble relating to the danger posed by that situation.One of the things that makes Doctor Who so cool to the BBC's loyal viewers is the, "Hey! I can relate to that!" factor. Also the "Hey! I've been to that place!" factor. People might not realize it all of the time, but it always plays a role in how easily someone relates to a show.
The British version of Firefly will star John Barrowman as Mal, Sophie Okonedo as Zoe, Simon Pegg as Wash, Sean Bean as Jayne, Michelle Ryan as Inara, Karen Gillan as Kaylee, Richard Ayoade as Book, Arthur Darvill as Simon, and Emma Watson as River [small](I'm sorry, Summer, I'm so sorry)[/small]. All the American colloquialisms will be replaced with English ones and all the references to Chinese culture will be replaced with Welsh. All the allusion to the Wild West will be replaced with a more Robin Hood style. And only then could British audiences really enjoy it in the same way that Americans have.Would you have enjoyed Doctor Who as much if it had originally been set in Japan? Or Russia? Or India? I doubt it. The sets, regional colloquialisms, historical/pop culture references... all of that wouldn't resonate with you quite as well. And it might just be that the plot and acting ALONE aren't quite enough to hook a massive audience on shows like that--there needs to be a relatable "hook" somewhere.
Of the new series 30 episodes are set in modern Britain, 10 are set in historical Britain and 29 are set outside Britain (this counts future space stations run by Britain as outside it in terms of relatability). Of those the majority are set in A generic London suburb or generic countryside rather than specific location.dastardly said:It's called localization, folks. One of the things that makes Doctor Who so cool to the BBC's loyal viewers is the, "Hey! I can relate to that!" factor. Also the "Hey! I've been to that place!" factor. People might not realize it all of the time, but it always plays a role in how easily someone relates to a show.
As above, it isn't set in one specific location, the basic premise of the how is that of people traveling through time and space. Besides, I watch dozens of programs set outside Britain and plenty of programs made outside Britain.Would you have enjoyed Doctor Who as much if it had originally been set in Japan? Or Russia? Or India? I doubt it. The sets, regional colloquialisms, historical/pop culture references... all of that wouldn't resonate with you quite as well. And it might just be that the plot and acting ALONE aren't quite enough to hook a massive audience on shows like that--there needs to be a relatable "hook" somewhere.
The BBC should not make or lisence programs for non-British viewers. It defies the whole purpose of the BBC.So, maybe the folks behind Doctor Who want to expand the audience a bit. Set up franchises, so to speak. Let them. Let some good American writers try a more America-localized version (not British or Canadian writers TRYING to "write American"), and see if it takes. If it does, that extra money coming in could make ALL of the shows better (which, incidentally, is why America has commercial breaks).
I'm BritishFallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:Never ever say that near any of us british...The_root_of_all_evil said:England has more in common with France than America.
And it isn't just "the States" that pull this shit, either. But beyond ALL of that, have you stopped to consider something else:zhoominator said:Actually the whole localisation thing is one that always annoys me because it isn't just British shows the States makes versions of.
As long as folks from those other countries keep MAKING the stuff because THEY want the DOLLARS for it, it's not OUR problem. Look elsewhere--we make plenty of our own stuff. You act like we're the only country that does any of this stuff, when seriously, what percentage of the WORLD'S entertainment (music, shows, movies) is MADE BY us?Foreign films and kids shows being just a couple of examples. I mean talk about ignorance and intolerance and believing everything needs to be made for Americans.
Yeah, we already did. It was called Quantum Leap, and it was a damn good show. We've been there, done that, which tells me AGAIN that this idea--if it's even REAL--is something some British businessman is cooking up because he and some British focus group decided it would be a way to make more money. The show is over THERE, so any decision for it to leave must originate from THERE, not HERE.If America want a time travelling hero, let them have one. But please make it something new entirely, rather than just altering an existing show beyond recognition just to suit them.
But it's somehow more okay to call it "arrogant" when it's something done TO (not BY) American culture? The things folks need to understand:Don't get me wrong, us Brits do it too and it annoys me no less when we do it, it just annoys me that people don't seem to want to "get" other cultures. It may just be a personal thing however because I tend to find watching foreign films very interesting.
And 100% of them focus on things that are more culturally relevant to mainstream BRITISH culture. Turns of phrase that we don't use here, references to sporting events we don't watch, yadda yadda yadda. Because you're IN IT, you don't realize how many cultural "stamps" are on the shows created by your culture--but you can't sure spot them in OTHER COUNTRIES' STUFF.Axolotl said:Of the new series 30 episodes are set in modern Britain, 10 are set in historical Britain and 29 are set outside Britain (this counts future space stations run by Britain as outside it in terms of relatability). Of those the majority are set in A generic London suburb or generic countryside rather than specific location.
It is told through ONE set of cultural eyebrows, and it finds its ANCHOR in one specific location (or, more accurately, culture). And someone who works on the show isn't confident enough in the "basic premise" to feel that they could just send it over as-is. The writers aren't confident enough in their own craft, and that ain't our problem.As above, it isn't set in one specific location, the basic premise of the how is that of people traveling through time and space. Besides, I watch dozens of programs set outside Britain and plenty of programs made outside Britain.
You should have specified you were talking about national pop-culture and a general zeitgeist. Now how does that draw me to the show? I watch lots of programs not made in Britain and the different idiosyncrasies don't put me off, infact it helps increase the appeal. What's the point in simply rehashing another culture's work? It rarely ends up with a superior product and the time and effot could have gone into something original.dastardly said:And 100% of them focus on things that are more culturally relevant to mainstream BRITISH culture. Turns of phrase that we don't use here, references to sporting events we don't watch, yadda yadda yadda. Because you're IN IT, you don't realize how many cultural "stamps" are on the shows created by your culture--but you can't sure spot them in OTHER COUNTRIES' STUFF.
Now you see what you're saying here, this is just insulting and detrimental to your arguement. If Americans are so much more multicultural then why do British TV shows need to be redone for the US? Plenty of American TV shows are shown over here and the programs that are remade are generally game or quiz shows.Why is that? Because you are noticing the absence of something that YOU consider to be "normal," with something "unusual" left in its place. We're far more tolerant of that kind of thing here, anyway, when one considers the ENORMOUS variety of different cultures we encounter in any given day on any given street--not just the small handful of mainstream European threads.
What the hell does this paragraph mean?It is told through ONE set of cultural eyebrows, and it finds its ANCHOR in one specific location (or, more accurately, culture). And someone who works on the show isn't confident enough in the "basic premise" to feel that they could just send it over as-is. The writers aren't confident enough in their own craft, and that ain't our problem.
He'll also turn up late to everything.XJ-0461 said:If they make an American version of Doctor Who, chances are that "Doctor Who" will be his name, he'll have a ray gun, and he'll be much more willing to kill hisenemies.allies. Friendly fire?
But if it does get made, i hope it fails horribly while the BBC version flies high.