Xhoyl said:
I must have missed your later posts, apologies for that.
People can improve on earlier work, but I don't really think that Code Geass did. If you can look past the form of English they used at the time, Hamlet is pretty damn great. I'm not saying that all classical literature is great, of course it's not. But you can't just disregard hundreds of years of writing in a sweeping generalisation. Are Okouchi Ichiro and Taniguchi Goro as good at writing as William Shakespeare? Definitely not. Not in my opinion anyway.
The fact that these were written first is relevant, because it makes Code Geass generic. As part of my college work, I've read so many Revenge Tragedy plays that it's hard not to notice how stereotypical it is of the genre. It is executed well, but it's hard to call it the pinnacle of writing when it breaks no confines and does nothing for the genre other than add robots. It's like how I can't call Avatar a truly great film. It may be executed well, but it's a story that has been done so many times that no matter how well executed it is, it can't make up for the fact that it's generic. It's a flaw, no matter what perspective you're looking at this from.
As for Lelouch being like Light Yagami, he certainly shares some characteristics. An aloof, obnoxiously intelligent school kid who gains a supernatural power which he uses to try and take over the world. They both do some pretty awful things but ultimately succeed to some extent and die in the process, thereby achieving redemption of all the bad things they've done in the past. The only difference between the two is that Lelouch is less of a dick about it, but the actions are still the same, and in revenge tragedies, it's the actions, not the words, which define a character. I do agree that Lelouch is a more likable character, that much is obvious, Light is a crazy person, but they
are similar.