I'm looking forward to Mass Effect 3 more than virtually all else. Some of the marketing changes and other things that have come about after EA acquired them do irk me a bit but not enough to hate the developer...I just hate EA.
Never heard of them. I have very vague memories of the Witcher I think. Then again I´m note interested in medevil RPG settings, so that´s probably why it flew under my radar.SmashLovesTitanQuest said:In case you are being serious; they are the studio behind The Witcher games. Worshiped by many because they did not use intrusive DRM on their titles, made both games difficult and showed it was still possible to make a shit load of money while pulling the whole thing off.Sabertooth said:Yosharian said:CD Projekt Red would like a word with you.Sabertooth said:Because as much as you like to think otherwise, that´s real life for you.Crono1973 said:Why do people argue that since a business needs to make money, anything goes?Sabertooth said:Well even so, it has people who have jobs that depend on the success of their products. It´s not a charity case. They have to sell their products to the most people available, lest people loose their jobs.BloatedGuppy said:Presumably the accusation is that they have sacrificed all artistic integrity in order to maximize profit. This, of course, assumes that profits are automatically maximized via the sacrifice of all artistic integrity, which is seldom the case.Sabertooth said:How can a company that has to make money in order to exist, "sells out"? I never really understood that line of though.
Now I´m not defending them or attack them. I´m just saying that telling a company that functions on a profit basis, that it has "sold out" reeks of elitism to me. Think their games suck? Ok fine, but don´t act all pissy when the game has good sales.Or or what is that?Yosharian said:CD Projekt Red would like a word with you.Sabertooth said:Because as much as you like to think otherwise, that´s real life for you.Crono1973 said:Why do people argue that since a business needs to make money, anything goes?Sabertooth said:Well even so, it has people who have jobs that depend on the success of their products. It´s not a charity case. They have to sell their products to the most people available, lest people loose their jobs.BloatedGuppy said:Presumably the accusation is that they have sacrificed all artistic integrity in order to maximize profit. This, of course, assumes that profits are automatically maximized via the sacrifice of all artistic integrity, which is seldom the case.Sabertooth said:How can a company that has to make money in order to exist, "sells out"? I never really understood that line of though.
Now I´m not defending them or attack them. I´m just saying that telling a company that functions on a profit basis, that it has "sold out" reeks of elitism to me. Think their games suck? Ok fine, but don´t act all pissy when the game has good sales.
Lets not forget that the Warcraft MMO made Blizz millions an millions.So they choose the right thing.Crono1973 said:It's fine that you're passive but we are here to discuss these things.Sabertooth said:Let´s, I played Kotor 1 and 2. So Kotor 3 never came out. Shrugs, life goes on, I would have found another thing to keep me interested. If other people want to play MMO, more power to them. I don´t really care about WoW and think the art style is cartoonish and the game boring, but I don´t say Blizzard has "sold out" or anything like it. I just don´t play the game, but I also realize that with the am mount of millions that play the game, my vote is meaningless. In all it´s just a waste of air, just like bitching about say.. Twilight or such.Crono1973 said:..and I am perfectly free to complain about their games too.Sabertooth said:And the amount of people that will still buy games will still be superior to the "fans". It´s just a fact of life. You re perfectly free to not buy their games.Crono1973 said:Oh the classic "make a better game or don't complain" defense.Sabertooth said:You call it being "naive" I call not being buthurted about trivial things. You can always try to run your own business tho.Crono1973 said:I did and I wonder how naive you really are. Well, they must make money so they are permitted to do anything to reach that goal.Sabertooth said:Instead of trying to be funny, you should read the other post I made.Crono1973 said:Well, it's a good thing I know how to use Google. You should try it. Here's how:Sabertooth said:How can a company that has to make money in order to exist, "sells out"? I never really understood that line of though.
- Open a new tab
- go to https://www.google.com/
- in the search box type "sell out"
Since I am nice though and want to make it easier for you, I will just drop the definition here:
Anyone who sacrifices artistic integrity in an effort to become more successful or popular (generally in music); someone who forgets their roots.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sell%20out
You're welcome.
ME3 is part of a trilogy, to take the third game and shift the goalpost towards Kinect and multiplayer is just wrong. DA2 went in the wrong direction too considering it was the second game in a series designed to BRING BACK CLASSIC PC RPG GAMEPLAY. Bioware: "Let's take a series made for PC's and make the sequel for consoles and let's disable controller support for PC gamers making the console version the superior one".
There's more to it that just "they need to make money".
Hint: I am the consumer here, not the competition. I have a right to complain and I don't need to make a better game.
Bioware hasn't done right by it's fans and as a result many won't be giving Bioware any money for their latest releases. There is nothing wrong with talking about it and we don't all need to be business owners to have an opinion.
How many people really wanted another MMO? How many would have preferred KOTOR 3? Did they care?
Blizzard did sell out, people wanted another Warcraft RTS and they got an MMO. You can't do anything about it but there's nothing wrong with having an opinion and discussing it on a gaming forum.
Want another example, nobody want Age of Empires Online, people wanted Age of Empires 4. Guess what we got?
I hope we get a Fallout 4 instead of a Fallout MMO.
Bioware has just played "follow the leader". Suppose no one complained, would that have prevented an MMO instead of a full game. Will complaints today prevent a Fallout MMO or an Uncharted MMO?
Why not just uninstall Origin after your finished with ME3? Or is it uninstallable?mrF00bar said:Those things would annoying me but now I just don't care about them because of Origin. I refuse to install it onto my PC and am therefore also not going to be able to play ME3. Other than that I still hold Bioware in high regard but after EA took them over I have just been waiting to see them get run into the ground and it brings a tear to my eye knowing EA will do it someday.soren7550 said:The only BioWare games I have played are Mass Effect 1 & 2, and Dragon Age: Origins (played the demo for DA2, and I didn't think it was bad). But with Mass Effect 3s upcoming release (which I am so eagerly awaiting), my opinion of BioWare is going down. 'Mass Effect 3 is better with Kinect!' 'Mass Effect 3 has three modes of play!' 'Mass Effect 3 is a great place for new players to jump into the series!' 'Multiplayer!', all of that just pisses me off so much.
Except that, y'know, they want to go back to the RPG roots. A good analogy for Bioware would be the Goldilocks tale; one game goes too much in that direction, the next too much in the other direction, and the third sits right in the sweet spot.Crono1973 said:Mass Effect 3 sounds like the ultimate sell out
That's great for them, but what's good for the company is not always good for the consumer. "We didn't get what we asked for, but they made money" is a pretty puzzling argument in favor of this sort of behavior. If a developer completely abandons what the target audience wants in favor of a new one (possibly drastically changing/retconning the IP that the former audience loved so much in the process) then they have a pretty fair justification for being annoyed with the developer, I figure. No one would care if Blizzard made an unrelated MMO on the side and made millions off of it, but it was made in substitution for the rest of an rts series. Not only is the MMO takign the palce of warcraft 4, but it *is* warcraft 4, as it is another game in the same series. I can understand why many fans would be upset with the final note of a beloved series ending in a completely different genre.IamGamer41 said:Lets not forget that the Warcraft MMO made Blizz millions an millions.So they choose the right thing.Crono1973 said:It's fine that you're passive but we are here to discuss these things.Sabertooth said:Let´s, I played Kotor 1 and 2. So Kotor 3 never came out. Shrugs, life goes on, I would have found another thing to keep me interested. If other people want to play MMO, more power to them. I don´t really care about WoW and think the art style is cartoonish and the game boring, but I don´t say Blizzard has "sold out" or anything like it. I just don´t play the game, but I also realize that with the am mount of millions that play the game, my vote is meaningless. In all it´s just a waste of air, just like bitching about say.. Twilight or such.Crono1973 said:..and I am perfectly free to complain about their games too.Sabertooth said:And the amount of people that will still buy games will still be superior to the "fans". It´s just a fact of life. You re perfectly free to not buy their games.Crono1973 said:Oh the classic "make a better game or don't complain" defense.Sabertooth said:You call it being "naive" I call not being buthurted about trivial things. You can always try to run your own business tho.Crono1973 said:I did and I wonder how naive you really are. Well, they must make money so they are permitted to do anything to reach that goal.Sabertooth said:Instead of trying to be funny, you should read the other post I made.Crono1973 said:Well, it's a good thing I know how to use Google. You should try it. Here's how:Sabertooth said:How can a company that has to make money in order to exist, "sells out"? I never really understood that line of though.
- Open a new tab
- go to https://www.google.com/
- in the search box type "sell out"
Since I am nice though and want to make it easier for you, I will just drop the definition here:
Anyone who sacrifices artistic integrity in an effort to become more successful or popular (generally in music); someone who forgets their roots.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sell%20out
You're welcome.
ME3 is part of a trilogy, to take the third game and shift the goalpost towards Kinect and multiplayer is just wrong. DA2 went in the wrong direction too considering it was the second game in a series designed to BRING BACK CLASSIC PC RPG GAMEPLAY. Bioware: "Let's take a series made for PC's and make the sequel for consoles and let's disable controller support for PC gamers making the console version the superior one".
There's more to it that just "they need to make money".
Hint: I am the consumer here, not the competition. I have a right to complain and I don't need to make a better game.
Bioware hasn't done right by it's fans and as a result many won't be giving Bioware any money for their latest releases. There is nothing wrong with talking about it and we don't all need to be business owners to have an opinion.
How many people really wanted another MMO? How many would have preferred KOTOR 3? Did they care?
Blizzard did sell out, people wanted another Warcraft RTS and they got an MMO. You can't do anything about it but there's nothing wrong with having an opinion and discussing it on a gaming forum.
Want another example, nobody want Age of Empires Online, people wanted Age of Empires 4. Guess what we got?
I hope we get a Fallout 4 instead of a Fallout MMO.
Bioware has just played "follow the leader". Suppose no one complained, would that have prevented an MMO instead of a full game. Will complaints today prevent a Fallout MMO or an Uncharted MMO?
Oroboros said:That's great for them, but what's good for the company is not always good for the consumer. "We didn't get what we asked for, but they made money" is a pretty puzzling argument in favor of this sort of behavior. If a developer completely abandons what the target audience wants in favor of a new one (possibly drastically changing/retconning the IP that the former audience loved so much in the process) then they have a pretty fair justification for being annoyed with the developer, I figure. No one would care if Blizzard made an unrelated MMO on the side and made millions off of it, but it was made in substitution for the rest of an rts series. Not only is the MMO takign the palce of warcraft 4, but it *is* warcraft 4, as it is another game in the same series. I can understand why many fans would be upseIamGamer41 said:Lets not forget that the Warcraft MMO made Blizz millions an millions.So they choose the right thing.Crono1973 said:It's fine that you're passive but we are here to discuss these things.Sabertooth said:Let´s, I played Kotor 1 and 2. So Kotor 3 never came out. Shrugs, life goes on, I would have found another thing to keep me interested. If other people want to play MMO, more power to them. I don´t really care about WoW and think the art style is cartoonish and the game boring, but I don´t say Blizzard has "sold out" or anything like it. I just don´t play the game, but I also realize that with the am mount of millions that play the game, my vote is meaningless. In all it´s just a waste of air, just like bitching about say.. Twilight or such.Crono1973 said:..and I am perfectly free to complain about their games too.Sabertooth said:And the amount of people that will still buy games will still be superior to the "fans". It´s just a fact of life. You re perfectly free to not buy their games.Crono1973 said:Oh the classic "make a better game or don't complain" defense.Sabertooth said:You call it being "naive" I call not being buthurted about trivial things. You can always try to run your own business tho.Crono1973 said:I did and I wonder how naive you really are. Well, they must make money so they are permitted to do anything to reach that goal.Sabertooth said:Instead of trying to be funny, you should read the other post I made.Crono1973 said:Well, it's a good thing I know how to use Google. You should try it. Here's how:Sabertooth said:How can a company that has to make money in order to exist, "sells out"? I never really understood that line of though.
- Open a new tab
- go to https://www.google.com/
- in the search box type "sell out"
Since I am nice though and want to make it easier for you, I will just drop the definition here:
Anyone who sacrifices artistic integrity in an effort to become more successful or popular (generally in music); someone who forgets their roots.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sell%20out
You're welcome.
ME3 is part of a trilogy, to take the third game and shift the goalpost towards Kinect and multiplayer is just wrong. DA2 went in the wrong direction too considering it was the second game in a series designed to BRING BACK CLASSIC PC RPG GAMEPLAY. Bioware: "Let's take a series made for PC's and make the sequel for consoles and let's disable controller support for PC gamers making the console version the superior one".
There's more to it that just "they need to make money".
Hint: I am the consumer here, not the competition. I have a right to complain and I don't need to make a better game.
Bioware hasn't done right by it's fans and as a result many won't be giving Bioware any money for their latest releases. There is nothing wrong with talking about it and we don't all need to be business owners to have an opinion.
How many people really wanted another MMO? How many would have preferred KOTOR 3? Did they care?
Blizzard did sell out, people wanted another Warcraft RTS and they got an MMO. You can't do anything about it but there's nothing wrong with having an opinion and discussing it on a gaming forum.
Want another example, nobody want Age of Empires Online, people wanted Age of Empires 4. Guess what we got?
I hope we get a Fallout 4 instead of a Fallout MMO.
Bioware has just played "follow the leader". Suppose no one complained, would that have prevented an MMO instead of a full game. Will complaints today prevent a Fallout MMO or an Uncharted MMO?
To be honest, I found Warcraft 3 a pretty mediocre game. Probably the same reason I don´t really care about WoW.Oroboros said:That's great for them, but what's good for the company is not always good for the consumer. "We didn't get what we asked for, but they made money" is a pretty puzzling argument in favor of this sort of behavior. If a developer completely abandons what the target audience wants in favor of a new one (possibly drastically changing/retconning the IP that the former audience loved so much in the process) then they have a pretty fair justification for being annoyed with the developer, I figure. No one would care if Blizzard made an unrelated MMO on the side and made millions off of it, but it was made in substitution for the rest of an rts series. Not only is the MMO takign the palce of warcraft 4, but it *is* warcraft 4, as it is another game in the same series. I can understand why many fans would be upset with the final note of a beloved series ending in a completely different genre.IamGamer41 said:Lets not forget that the Warcraft MMO made Blizz millions an millions.So they choose the right thing.Crono1973 said:It's fine that you're passive but we are here to discuss these things.Sabertooth said:Let´s, I played Kotor 1 and 2. So Kotor 3 never came out. Shrugs, life goes on, I would have found another thing to keep me interested. If other people want to play MMO, more power to them. I don´t really care about WoW and think the art style is cartoonish and the game boring, but I don´t say Blizzard has "sold out" or anything like it. I just don´t play the game, but I also realize that with the am mount of millions that play the game, my vote is meaningless. In all it´s just a waste of air, just like bitching about say.. Twilight or such.Crono1973 said:..and I am perfectly free to complain about their games too.Sabertooth said:And the amount of people that will still buy games will still be superior to the "fans". It´s just a fact of life. You re perfectly free to not buy their games.Crono1973 said:Oh the classic "make a better game or don't complain" defense.Sabertooth said:You call it being "naive" I call not being buthurted about trivial things. You can always try to run your own business tho.Crono1973 said:I did and I wonder how naive you really are. Well, they must make money so they are permitted to do anything to reach that goal.Sabertooth said:Instead of trying to be funny, you should read the other post I made.Crono1973 said:Well, it's a good thing I know how to use Google. You should try it. Here's how:Sabertooth said:How can a company that has to make money in order to exist, "sells out"? I never really understood that line of though.
- Open a new tab
- go to https://www.google.com/
- in the search box type "sell out"
Since I am nice though and want to make it easier for you, I will just drop the definition here:
Anyone who sacrifices artistic integrity in an effort to become more successful or popular (generally in music); someone who forgets their roots.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sell%20out
You're welcome.
ME3 is part of a trilogy, to take the third game and shift the goalpost towards Kinect and multiplayer is just wrong. DA2 went in the wrong direction too considering it was the second game in a series designed to BRING BACK CLASSIC PC RPG GAMEPLAY. Bioware: "Let's take a series made for PC's and make the sequel for consoles and let's disable controller support for PC gamers making the console version the superior one".
There's more to it that just "they need to make money".
Hint: I am the consumer here, not the competition. I have a right to complain and I don't need to make a better game.
Bioware hasn't done right by it's fans and as a result many won't be giving Bioware any money for their latest releases. There is nothing wrong with talking about it and we don't all need to be business owners to have an opinion.
How many people really wanted another MMO? How many would have preferred KOTOR 3? Did they care?
Blizzard did sell out, people wanted another Warcraft RTS and they got an MMO. You can't do anything about it but there's nothing wrong with having an opinion and discussing it on a gaming forum.
Want another example, nobody want Age of Empires Online, people wanted Age of Empires 4. Guess what we got?
I hope we get a Fallout 4 instead of a Fallout MMO.
Bioware has just played "follow the leader". Suppose no one complained, would that have prevented an MMO instead of a full game. Will complaints today prevent a Fallout MMO or an Uncharted MMO?
Well, I never really got into it either, except for the custom maps and stuff like that. I prefer games in the vein of Total War. But I have known people who are into that sort of stuff, so I can understand the sentiment in this case, and I feel that aspects of this argument do apply to the direction that Bioware is heading in recent years.Sabertooth said:[quote="Oroboros" post="9.339715.13744501
To be honest, I found Warcraft 3 a pretty mediocre game. Probably the same reason I don´t really care about WoW.
What was the difference in profits?Amaror said:To anyone here, who says they had to "sell out" to get money:
Dragon Age 2 made less money than Dragon Age Origins.