Poll: Anyone else hate the Skyrim animal races?

Recommended Videos

NLS

Norwegian Llama Stylist
Jan 7, 2010
1,594
0
0
Argonians and Khajit had more animal-like legs in Morrowind, however that required a separate skeleton and animations.
 

Fearzone

Boyz! Boyz! Boyz!
Dec 3, 2008
1,241
0
0
Two things get to me, lizard women with boobs, and the cat people look like paper-mache dolls. I wanted to make a cat-girl assassin, but it just wasn't happening, so went with a red guard instead.
 

Agow95

New member
Jul 29, 2011
445
0
0
I loved playing a Khajiit, I had night vision and was less crap at sneaking than normal, I RP'd him like Cat from Red Dwarf
 

Char-Nobyl

New member
May 8, 2009
784
0
0
xPixelatedx said:
I am going to go out on a limb here and assume you have never seen a carnivorous dinosaur.
From where I am sitting those kinds of legs look pretty functional for a two legged animal.
Alright, I'm not going to dwell the problems with using a video entitled 'Gigantosaurus' as evidence of the effectiveness of back-canted legs, nor that you're citing a CGI dinosaur made for a sci-fi show for evidence in an argument, nor even the fact that the video itself neatly condenses everything that's wrong with half the videos on Youtube (random video clips with someone else's music taste spliced over it).

Moving past those, you'll note that there was another half to my argument, specifically the "uses ungodly amounts of energy" part. How much does a creature with back-canted legs have to eat per day just to sustain normal activity? I mentioned neanderthals earlier, and that was one of their big issues: they were only slightly bigger than the average homo sapien, but required significantly more food as a result. And when you're almost exclusively a carnivore, a fast-breeding competitor can literally eat you to extinction.

Also note the gigantic tail. See, that's the thing about having back-canted legs: they aren't very good at keeping things that stand upright balanced. The T. Rex was originally thought to walk essentially upright, with the tail dragging behind it, but as it turns out, that sort of thing causes horrific joint damage over time. The gigantic tail was a counterweight to make up for the fact that you don't have forelegs to keep yourself balanced. You can't take one pair of legs off a table and still expect it to hold itself up.

Take a look at the body structure of everything bipedal with back-canted legs. Notice a pattern? Heavy front, counterweight in back, and constantly with their back parallel to the ground? There's a reason for that, and it's simple: back-canted legs provide shit balance for bipedal creatures. Every seen someone get taken down by hitting them behind the knees? Dinosaurs had all their dangerous bits jutting a fair distance in front of their legs, so it didn't matter for them, but put those joints on something bipedal that walks upright, and you've got an animal that crumbles like a house of cards if you kick them in the shin.

Or push them anywhere, really. If you've ever been shoved when your knees were locked, try and remember how you responded. Was it by moving your legs/joints in ways that would be impossible if your knees faced the other way? Probably. You can't brace yourself when your feet are kicking up in front of you while you topple over.

xPixelatedx said:
The real reason why they changed the legs is because they didn't want to make entierly separate armor/clothing variants for the beast races. They even came out and said this. You guys don't have to defend their lazy art design, they were happy admitting to it.
Okay...so they made the right choice for the wrong reasons. I've no problem with that. The end result is still the same.

Besides, it's less about defending Bethesda's aesthetic choices and more about dismantling OP's complaints. That's the fun part for me.
 
Mar 9, 2010
2,722
0
0
I like them but I prefer how they appeared in Morrowind in terms of physiology, they were much more unique. Oblivion changed that and they've apparently chosen to keep it for Skyrim and presumably the rest of the series. Their facial structure is better than before though, they just need to stand out a bit more than the man and mer races.

But that's my big issue with Skyrim now that I've played Morrowind: it's far too simple. There's less pressure placed on what sort of character you want to be and how you're limited by your choice. Now you can be a hulking tank of a barbarian Nord and still succeed in the thief, assassin and mage quest lines with little difficulty. You don't even have the same guild structure, you're either on par with everyone else or you're on top, which kind of takes out the importance of levelling skills specific to that guild and being actually good at your profession. There's more of how Skyrim is too simple but I think this is enough for now.
 

xPixelatedx

New member
Jan 19, 2011
1,316
0
0
Char-Nobyl said:
Moving past those, you'll note that there was another half to my argument, specifically the "uses ungodly amounts of energy" part. How much does a creature with back-canted legs have to eat per day just to sustain normal activity? I mentioned neanderthals earlier, and that was one of their big issues: they were only slightly bigger than the average homo sapien, but required significantly more food as a result. And when you're almost exclusively a carnivore, a fast-breeding competitor can literally eat you to extinction.

Also note the gigantic tail. See, that's the thing about having back-canted legs: they aren't very good at keeping things that stand upright balanced. etc.
I was just showing an example of how those legs could work, I did not say that the beast races should necessarily become dinosaurs. I also don't think it's right to assume they would need to meet the exact same requirements to have two legs like that, given that dinosaurs were creatures of gargantuan mass.
Here is a better video.

I am actually surprised that the dog is able to even hop and skip, and dogs aren't even designed to do this. I would have loved the Kahjiit to be a bit more like this (technically they were in morrowind). I do however acknowledge that an animal who has legs and walks like this probably would not be able to outright run this way. But if their overall body design is still very animal like, I don't see why they can't get on all fours and floor-it. Technically speaking, if that dog was somehow given working front legs, it could still walk upright if it wanted to, but then it would also be able to run alongside any other dog on all fours. That would have been a good design for Kahjiits.
 

Lunar Templar

New member
Sep 20, 2009
8,225
0
0
they add diversity to a genera that needs it, seirusly, how many more RPGs do we need with JUST the human/elf/dwarf trio, screw that, gimme more races, fun races, the less they look like the 'big 3' the better.

also, your over thinking it

like
 

direkiller

New member
Dec 4, 2008
1,655
0
0
Lilani said:
In exploring Skyrim this last week, I discovered something. I really, really hate the animal races, or anthropomorphs or whatever you want to call them. Conceptually and aesthetically. First of all, they make little sense as a race. I mean really, people who are EXACTLY like regular people but with animal hides and fur? REALLY? What is the evolutionary advantage to that? Why are the changes in physiology restricted to the head and skin? Why aren't their joints reversed like animals legs? Why aren't they more muscular, or more svelt, or taller or shorter or hunchback? It makes absolutely no sense. It's like they just said "Hurr derp, let's stick some random animal heads on our people and call it a day!"

Then they're just ugly and wreak of laziness in design. Because once you think about it, the reason their physiology is the same as regular people is obvious. If their bodies are the same, the same animations and scripts can be used to make them move can be the same as well. And then I just feel awkward looking at them. They're like a furry's wet dream come alive.

So please, somebody tell me I'm not the only one who really can't stand these things?
it dates back to older Elder scrolls games when they had to keep them roughly the same(disk space and such)

To be fair they did rework them a bit in Skyrim to make them diffident but id imagine they cant go too far due to fan boy rage and having to rework every clothing item(basically 4x as much work).
although i wish they did seeing my charter's tale pokes though the nightingale armor
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
That's what happens when you canonize different humanoid species and their appearances in 1993.

Anyways, you've probably inspired a modder to make them more animalistic, so give it a bit of time.
 

Bato

New member
Oct 18, 2009
284
0
0
The beast races are very interesting, but only when you read into their lore and culture. Otherwise they're just furry bait, and I HATED them before I started reading all into Elder Scrolls lore.

The TES universe have these god-things, the Aedra, they're enititys of creation except they're technically mortal. If they want to make some sort of magical lizard race THEY DO IT BECAUSE SHUT UP I DO WHAT I WANT.
The Daedra are their opposites being immortal except all they can do is like, destroy and change things.

There is a particular type of Aedra, Hist Trees.
Sentient god trees.
And some lizards ate the sap of this tree once and tada:
http://www.tamriel-rebuilt.org/?p=conceptart&section=15262
They become sentient and build a culture around these trees,
In fact as I understand it Argonians are still just lizards
In that these human lizard people have sex and then they poop out little tiny salamanders
And as a child they have to eat hist sap to grow up and become just like the abomination that is their daddy
The more hist the more human, the less hist the less human.
So maybe that's how the Geico Gecko was born
He had like a drop of the sap.

http://www.tamriel-rebuilt.org/?p=conceptart&section=15266
Then you have these cat people where their race is dependent on moon cycles,
Between the two moons and the different phases they are in different types of Khajiit are born.
So like, they can be anything from talking kitty things about the size of house cats
To like weeaboos
To Furrys
To GIANT FUCKING ELEPHANT SIZE MONSTER CATS, imagine having THAT come out of your wife.
CONGRATULATIONS MITTENS
IT'S FOUR TIMES BIGGER THAN YOU
Also your wife is dead

And it's never directly explained how they came to be,
But like, the Weeaboo version of Khajiit are supposed to look like Wood Elves
Except they have tails and stupid cat ears or something
But Wood Elves LOOVE to eat hem some Khajiit because they are crazy cannibal people
And Moon Sugar is like the best marinade ever
So you're finger lickin'-good when you eat it all your life because for some reason your race is resistant to it.
So the Khajiit don't talk about it.
And the Wood Elves don't talk about it.
And everyone just gets pissed when mentioned.

Now, I ain't saying this is ever stated anywhere, but this sounds mighty suspicious to me.
But Wood Elves have this innate ability where if a group of them came together
And sacrifice a plant or something to some blood god
Or maybe a chloroplast god
And perform the Rite of the Wild Hunt
That group would all turn into beast-things and they normally go on murderaperampages
And after that they all have a blood-orgy and then kill each other.
Sometimes.
 

franconbean

New member
Apr 30, 2011
251
0
0
My disdain from them stems from morrowind when they could not wear armour in certain slots because of their body shapes. They did remove this in Oblivion, but my dislike never really went away.
It's been a while, but if i recall correctly, khajit in morrowind did have reversed joints in their legs (they walked funny at least). They certainly didn't share a base character model with the other races.
 

LordFisheh

New member
Dec 31, 2008
478
0
0
I don't particularly hate them, but I don't like the way people create a 'nonhuman' race by taking a human, giving it fur and whacking an animal head on top. By all means make them humanoid, but they still need to feel like a different species.
 

ZexionSephiroth

New member
Apr 7, 2011
242
0
0
Lilani said:
First of all, they make little sense as a race. I mean really, people who are EXACTLY like regular people but with animal hides and fur?
Realisticly? If Khajit lived in colder climates then a fur coat would be more useful than human sweat could ever be. As Human sweat evolved for hot weather. Sure you could argue that's what clothes are for, but by the same token it's possible khajit only came up with clothes when Nords showed them how they work.
Lilani said:
REALLY? What is the evolutionary advantage to that? Why are the changes in physiology restricted to the head and skin?
Not to mention tails, but in any case think about why a creature would need a cat like head. Pressumably I can think that it may have to do with a meat rich diet they may have had before encountering nords and technology like bows and swords. I already mentioned fur. And I think a tail helps with balance. Digitigrade feet give them more spring in their step and cat ears allow better listening to their surroundings.
Lilani said:
Why aren't their joints reversed like animals legs?
*facepalm* I looked up a picture of a cat's hind legs and they are not "reversed" per say as it is that between the ball of their foot and their heel is longer. That is it. Same leg, just different length... and also lifted up to walk on the ball of foot, but the khajit have that too.
Lilani said:
Why aren't they more muscular, or more svelt, or taller or shorter or hunchback? It makes absolutely no sense.
When you're an ambush predator with an emphasis on speed, stealth, dexterity and acuracy (attributes of theives as well, which many khajit are); it makes a lot of sense for you to be as lithe as a cat. And since they are cats, that's a given. Which explains all of that. And as for hunch-back; I can hardly picture a hunchback being stealthy, can you?
Lilani said:
It's like they just said "Hurr derp, let's stick some random animal heads on our people and call it a day!"
Unlikely. design processes work more like "Hey you know what would be cool? animal people!" followed by another asking "Will it make sense? I mean, it needs to fit naturaly into the setting". Which khajit do quite well when you consider that their focal point is the fact they are treated as scum, theives, assassins. Which creates a self fulfilling prophecy that they will be forced to be theives. A tale of racism... Okay, it's not perfect, but Show me one thing that is perfect And I'll show you a fake.

Lilani said:
Then they're just ugly and wreak of laziness in design. Because once you think about it, the reason their physiology is the same as regular people is obvious. If their bodies are the same, the same animations and scripts can be used to make them move can be the same as well. And then I just feel awkward looking at them. They're like a furry's wet dream come alive.

So please, somebody tell me I'm not the only one who really can't stand these things?
Sometimes the lazy people have a point. If they have a similar to human form and animation pattern it becomes more endearing. At least up to a point, which I don't think skyrim has crossed yet.

As for the "furry's wet dream" comment, I have to say: "stop thinking about what other people are into, it makes you sound like more of a pervert than them." Because not only is what one person considers attractive their buisness and their buisness alone, but that Beauty itself is subjective on a level so complex you cannot understand it; having a complex interplay between so many subconssious elements that it's a Miracle that there are any people at all who's attractions are fairly mundane.

In fact, I'm sure everyone on this forum has some unusual quirk that they are attracted to; Gothic, Punk, anime-style, buisness people, sports stars, formal wear, red-hair, Russian, Japanese, American, British, German, Polyneisian. Some of these seem mundane, but consider that some people choose only partners with any one of those traits (possibly more); then it becomes clear they have have a harder time than people with low standards. And Then You realise, ALL people have that kind of mindset of narrow, wildly varying standards. Some of which just happen to choose features only pressent in fantasy, such as "Furry" as you're defining it.

My Forum Arguing hand is getting tired...
 

ED-Tw0 ZeRo N9nE

New member
Jan 12, 2012
51
0
0
Op, you leave my Khajit alone, or else I'll have to bust out the Sword of Omens.

"Thunder, Thunder, Thundercats HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!"

Haha, couldn't help myself, any other Khajit fans like to do this?
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
I love both of them. They have cool lore. That's about all I need to like a fantasy race.
 

djAMPnz

New member
Dec 21, 2011
31
0
0
I like the way the Khajiit and Argonians look in Skyrim. They have evolved to be more 'human-like' than their predecessors.

worldruler8 said:
Morrowing did it better
At first I thought this was just a typo, but you wrote it twice. My OCD is forcing me to point out it's Morrowind.

Also, Orcs (Orsimer) are elves, descendent from the Aldmer as all the other elves were. Mer means elf. As are the Falmer and Dwemer (Dwarves).
 

worldruler8

New member
Aug 3, 2010
216
0
0
djAMPnz said:
I like the way the Khajiit and Argonians look in Skyrim. They have evolved to be more 'human-like' than their predecessors.

worldruler8 said:
Morrowing did it better
At first I thought this was just a typo, but you wrote it twice. My OCD is forcing me to point out it's Morrowind.

Also, Orcs (Orsimer) are elves, descendent from the Aldmer as all the other elves were. Mer means elf. As are the Falmer and Dwemer (Dwarves).
Oh, I guess I did. :/ I blame my dyslexia. But yeah, my point (and opinion) still stands.
 

darksuccubus

New member
Jan 11, 2011
110
0
0
well, everyone already said everything, I like the races since Morrowind (and there they did look more animal-like) but the point is, they're supposed to be human-like. They do have different physiology - argonians are hatched from eggs and khajiits have spiky cocks (biography of barenzia, deleted chapter). They were created by gods and to me, they are different and unique enough