*sigh* You want evidence, here you go:SecretNegative said:What a weird video. She does seem to genuinly believe there's a male conspirace against women, her jokes are both badly timed and fucking weird, her arguments are based on kids shows (which is just stupid) and she lacks any evidence whatsoever for what's she's saying.Bocaj2000 said:schnipped
Actually, that video quite neatly incapasitated why I don't like feminism, it's full of whiny women seing sexism everywhere where there are none with completly baseless arguments without any suggestions on how to improve the situiation.
I know not all feminists are like this, but it is a worrying amoun of them.
Captcha: The Queen of England obviously lives in North Korea, why do you ask?
Just so you know, you're a feminist. It's about equality, not superiority. You just know some fucked up people.Mr F. said:No.
SNIP
I am an advocate for womens equality
SNIP
So whilst I will continue to "advocate womens rights" I will not associate myself with the movement.
I agree with you in terms of value, and the disparate ideas on it.Trilligan said:Equality in this sense is equality of rights and protections under the law. It is not a matter of personal equivalence, saying that all people are exactly alike. The fact that males and females are structurally different should not preclude both from having the same legal rights, any more than two males or two females of differing skin tones should have different legal rights.
As to 'value' - that is a nebulous concept in this discussion. What gives any single person value? Value to whom? Value in what way? The idea seems to muddy the waters significantly; it is simply too subjective.
As for 'chauvinistic' - I think you're the only person to have used the term so far.
As above, value is nebulous we very rarely say that an apple tree and an orange tree are worth the same, since if you are making cider then an orange tree is pretty damn useless.Ryan Hughes said:Well, it is true that men and women have different plumbing schemes, so to speak, that does not mean that they are not equal. Look, even though there are differences, I think we are all comfortable saying that an apple tree is roughly equal to an orange tree. We may like one fruit over the other, and one particular tree may yield more fruit than another, but generally speaking, we can equate the two as having an equal value. And, no I do not think you are a chauvinist, just slightly incorrect.
I would be hard-pressed to find a feminist that thought men suck and should be mal-treated (though misandrists exists), however what you are talking about is not their fight, and therefore they are not going to champion it, being women and all, whom are too busy with issues like female reproductive rights, being treated like meat for showing some skin, slut shaming, sex-trafficking, having pictures of Mario sodomizing them for even so much as saying there is misogyny in gaming culture where it has been suggested that it is not a vocal minority.Steve Waltz said:Hold please.Evilpigeon said:It's actually very true that young children are brought up with different sets of social paragdigms based upon gender and that these paradigms often have long term consequences - physics and engineering courses at universities tend to be pretty lacking in female applicants for example. It'd be nigh impossible to say for certain to what extent this gap is due to women on average being mentally predisposed towards other sorts of subjects and how much is caused by social pressure to avoid these subjects however it'd be very naive to argue that people's upbringing doesn't affect affect them at all.
Absolutely right, but like I mentioned in my second paragraph, these complaints sound trivial and selfish when Feminists only focus on women. Those males taking physics and engineering courses might not be taking those courses if they were playing with Barbies or watching Hanna Montana at a young age. It is selfish to only focus on the fact that being segregated at birth only affects women, when it actually affects both genders. And that's what makes it feel like silly complaints that many people (like myself) cannot take seriously.
THAT was the point of my post. I said I completely support equal rights and I would love to see the day when babies are treated as equals and having both boys and girls playing with G.I Joes and Barbies together, but I would NEVER sacrifice or favor one over the other like feminists do.
So you have nothing to say regarding the stoning to death of women in some countries or the mutilation of women's genitals in some other countries then?Durgiun said:I do not identify as a feminist. Mainly because there are so many branches of it and in my mind feminism is really just a bunch of up-tight prudes trying to kill everyone's fun. And I don't mean ''stopping men from pinching women's asses'', I mean ''trying to stop me from watching porn''. I could go on a diatribe that would rival a George R. R. Martin novel in length, but I will show mercy (and wisdom) and spare you all from that potential flame war.
By that definition I am I feminist. If you talk to people within academia about feminism or talk about 3rd wave feminism. It gets very radical very quickly and somehow the conversation always turns to 'men are horrible people'.Moth_Monk said:Are you a feminist?
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/feminism?q=feminismOxford English Dictionary Online said:Feminism
noun
[mass noun]
the advocacy of women?s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/feministOxford English Dictionary Online said:Definition of feminist
noun
a person who supports feminism.
If yes, then have you done anything active to advocate the equality of women's rights?
Incidentally, I am not asking why/why not you are/are not a feminist; that topic has been overdone already.
Darkmantle said:It's not the far right that gave feminism A bad name, it's feminists and feminist organizations I've interacted with that have given them a bad name. Using bad statistics is the most common problem. Being sexist themselves normally comes right after.moopig66 said:Yes... I hope most if not all people are. As you said, it's definition is believing in "women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes." if you don't agree with that than... Well... You are what's wron with the world.
Additionally, I'm tired of people saying that they choose not to identify with feminism because of the baggagage the Gomes with the term. It's only baggage comes from the very far right using it in a negative connotation. If someone like Rush Limbough uses a word as a negative, it's safe to say its probbably a good thing. If someone who likes bad things dislikes something that you like, take it as a compliment.
So... Yes... I'm a male feminist because I believe in equal rights for both sexes...
For example, did you know that although feminists supported the opening of the first woman's shelter, they strongly opposed the opening of the first man's shelter? I would also like to remind you that Domestic violence is about 45% male victims. Why did feminists oppose this if they are for equal rights?
And I don't listen to far right anything, and to hell with rush, so you can't use that cop out excuse.