Journeythroughhell said:
Here's my explanation: Modern Warfare 2 is a cheesy action film. Looking for plotholes in it is useless. It is very similar to The Rock in that regard, it's nothing more than an extremely well-made action flick.
There's only propaganda if you want to see propaganda (Killzone 2 wins on that field, Helghasts are a paper-thin allegory for nazis).
About the lags. I didn't experience them. Tell me all you want but if I didn't have'em, I can't relate to you. Akimbo shotguns are a *****, granted, but they're definitely not game killers. And I never found killstreaks unfair.
About the direction. Nothing new, again, granted, but it has so much, I sat through the campaing with my eyes glued to the fucking screen, saying "Holy crap, is this awesome" every five minutes.
I'm not a technician, I don't care for the resolution, I look at it and it looks gorgeous on my PC's screen.
Don't tell me that I like it for nothing just because you don't understand me and I can't make you understand me. Why should I try to explain why I like this game so much if all you say is "unbalanced multiplayer, low resolution, stupid story, how can you like this piece of shit?"
I'll tell you just that. During that Gulag level, when you were forced to fight through the shower cabins, I understood that I was playing the best game I've ever played. And your "bah! low resolution" stuff can't make me change my mind.
The Rock at least had a storyline which made sense. MW2's storyline makes
no sense, it's not just cheesy, it's clearly just a few set pieces tied together with a plot which makes no sense - there is no excuse that. Even Commando and Rambo makes more sense than MW2.
The Helghast are meant to be Nazi's (their uniform was based off the SS) - but that's hardly propaganda unless you want to argue the Nazi's were good guys.
You don't experience lag...Well that's really hard to believe unless you have a great connection, in which case you are just lucky, but what about host dropping? Kill streaks add to kill streaks which is ridiculous. Get 4 kills, lob down a turret. Turret gets you a few more, call in a Harrier, and then sh*t gets really retarded as you can't take down air support in one hit.
It has so much....Like what?! A few good set pieces, sure, Burger Town was great, but it really becomes ludicrous at some points, such as assaulting the white house. On hardened difficulty it's close to broken due to a lack of cover from point A to B, with machine gun nests you can't take out.
You are not a technician and clearly you haven't played any of the top graphical games of the last year, such as Uncharted 2, Crysis or Stalker. They are all far, far better than MW2, which has a draw distance of about 15m before becoming a grey mess. And great AA....
You can't give me a logical reason for liking the game other than "well yeah, but yeah, but no, but yeah, but no, but I likeds its." Why is it so hard to say what a game does well if it's as great as you claim it is? I can say why I enjoy Killzone, or Resistance 2, or any game on technical merits etc. I'm trying to show how MW2 has done nothing new for FPS, and is actually a step in the wrong direction, if not just backwards.
If MW2 is the best game you've ever played, you really need to play more games.