Poll: Arrow - The Best Show on TV Today

Recommended Videos

gamernerdtg2

New member
Jan 2, 2013
501
0
0
You know, I never really thought of Arrow as a super hero. They do a great job of convincing you that he's a regular dude who learned how to fight through hard knocks. I think that bringing in the "super" aspect would kill the whole show. So I don't really see the connection with Smallvile and Arrow.

The modern interpretations of Superman are so terrible I can't watch them. It's not cool to be "super" today because you have to be flawed. That's why I'm shocked that so many of you have issues with Oliver's character. He's one of the most flawed protagonists I've seen in a while, yet I root for him. I like the ambiguity of him being a "vigilante" but also being a protagonist. His character grows a ton through the first season as Oliver, but also as Arrow.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
I choose hidden option 5: I've seen it, and I think it's bad.
Not awful, not insulting. Just tepid and bad.
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
gamernerdtg2 said:
omega 616 said:
gamernerdtg2 said:
Yup, love the balls of it!

There are a few things that annoy me though. The island stuff, I like the idea of showing how he became such a badass through trail by fire but the plot is fucked up! The guy rescues him, takes care of him, then betrays him, then rescue, then betray, then rescue, then betray ... the fuck guy!

Tommy being self sacrificing goes against his character. Oliver and Tommy where basically the same, both party animals who had very rich parents and played the field ... Oliver gets "Killed" but actually turns into a man, Tommy grieves and becomes a man? "I'm so sad my best friend died, time to man up and stop partying"?

Oliver's love life. He is in love with Laurel but Tommy is dating her, after Tommy breaks up with Laurel 'cos he knows Oliver and Laurel still have a thing. Oliver says almost one sentence and Tommy changes his mind completely? Then Laurel talks to Oliver and after almost one sentence they do the nasty and Tommy catches them? What the fuck, will somebody have some conviction?

Laurels dad is a fucking numpty. I get why he hates Oliver but he hates the vigilante as well? You could say "he has a feeling that they are the same people" fair enough but he has been proven wrong on that one a few times AND the vigilante is doing what he can't ... he actually stops criminals, rather than just put them into a prison.
Try seeing those things from another perspective.

Yao Fe is the dude that trains Queen on the island, and his motivations are not always clear because Fires (guy in charge on the island) has Yao Fe's daughter. That's why you see the rescuing, capturing, etc. It's a tricky situation.

Would you rather Tommy lived on for the second season? There's nothing really to live for with his character. His dad destroyed the Glades, his mom is gone, and his best friend took the love of his life. Where is Tommy's story going from there? Is he going to become the new "Dark Archer" or something? Naw. I like Tommy's character, but it made sense to kill him off. I can't see him living in area that his father destroyed - always being reminded that his dad destroyed the Glades. He had to die.

Oliver's love life - he always loved Laurel. He was a playboy, so he was immature. After 5 years on an island, he still had feelings, but felt that his life as Arrow would get her killed or put her in danger. That's why there was all kinds of "yes", but "no" going on.

Laurel's dad actually comes around. He's blinded by the loss of his other daughter, but he changes. As he accepts his daughter's death, the rest of his character is able to balance out. He's able to be a better father to Laurel. As you know, he actually works with Oliver in the latter episodes, so he definitely changes.
I know I should have watched the season finale before reading that first line of your second paragraph ... my own fault, you did spoiler tag it.

Yao is Liam Neeson at the start, so why couldn't he save his daughter?

I don't think he had to die, maybe move away or something. I would kind of like to see him be the new dark archer, he is pissed that Oliver did actually kill his dad, he festers on it and trains to takes revenge .... then you kind of have a batman joker situation, Tommy wants to kill Oliver but is 5 years behind on training and Oliver can't kill his best friend who's dad he killed.

It would give you a new antagonist 'cos can't you just see the shot of Tommy walking into his dad armory and the camera zooms out from his face to reveal all his dads gadgets.

I'm sick of that bullshit to be honest, "I can't love you 'cos I'm a BAMF and could get you killed". You have a hidden identity for a fucking reason! Spiderman and superman pull the same shit, (although superman is the other way round) why bother having an alter ego if you don't need it ... do what ironman did.

Actually, I didn't know he works with Oliver later on ... I kind of guessed that's what was going to happen when he did the "I'm thinking" face when Ms Smoke gave him that little "I thought the vigilante was a criminal as well ..." speech, backed up with other stuff, such as him confessing his source to the LT and disarming the earthquaker thing.
 

Ishal

New member
Oct 30, 2012
1,177
0
0
Loonyyy said:
I started watching it a while ago, and it's not unwatchable, but it is pretty pulpy crap. The action's enjoyable enough, but the conspiracies are stupid, the characters are mostly annoying, and the philosophies are pretty unpalatable.

-Oliver: Can't do emotion, whenever he narrates (Like the start of the episodes) it's grating.
-Digg's entire character arc is obvious from the get go.
-Oliver is a hypocrite regarding his sister, but she's also incredibly annoying, her depression/addiction thing is insulting to anyone who's got firsthand knowledge of either of those things, and the whole "Oliver is out of touch with his family" thing goes way too long, and too stupid.
-Oliver is obviously the Hood. To everyone.
-Considering how often they spell it out, the main story isn't that complicated.
-Laurel's annoying, and the romance plots are goddamn irritating, fucking sexual tension, drama, love triangling "Will they won't they" forced conflict crap.
-Compulsory Detective with a grudge (Who happens to hate Oliver and The Hood).
-Psuedo Martial philosophy "Guns are weapons of emotion, a bow is the weapon of an expert" or something. *vomits*. Because using the bow makes you superior? Better hope the guy who fights with a blunt paper clip doesn't come along. You'll get nailed.
-Constantly running in to beat up enemies with his wooden bow, rather than shooting them. Looks so very silly.
-Never gets hit by sprays of full auto gunfire from multiple guys (Yet when the plot demands, he'll be shot by a novice marksman with a pistol, when he was able to see them and they were unarmed (They had to get out the gun, and then shoot him. Oh god it was stupid).
-Bullshit about "Good/Evil" with the purple chick, and the nature of revenge and justice, which just makes Oliver completely incomprehensible and entirely hypocritical.
-Oliver happily murders or badly wounds henchman (Arrows are fucking dangerous), but always gives their bosses a chance.
-Slade seems to think teaching Ollie to only fight hand to hand is a good idea, and dismisses guns, gives Oliver a gun and tells him to shoot him, and demonstrates that he can take it off him. Good thing guns don't work at a distance, eh?

I know I've listed a bunch of negatives, but it's an ok show. It's just a really flawed one. It could have been excellent, but instead it's just average. The island bits are fun, Digg is awesome, Slade is cool, the action scenes are fun, the Robin Hood style vigilante stuff's fun, but it's not exactly Breaking Bad or Game of Thrones. It's more in the league of Big Bang Theory or CSI.
Slade... okay I have to ask. Are Slade and Deathstroke the same character? I know there was a masked mercenary in the show.. was that Deathstroke?

I'm not into comics but I did watch teen titans a while back and liked Slade. I see Deathstroke and they seem very similar
 

Smiley Face

New member
Jan 17, 2012
704
0
0
I find it somewhat comical that you're literally calling it the best show on TV right now, but can't get the last name of half the important characters right. McQueen? Really?

It's good, but it's not great. The writing is definitely nothing out of the ordinary, a lot of the plots are downright predictable. The music is definitely nothing special. The fighting's pretty well done. You do get some really good acting from some of them - Oliver may seem wooden, but he's supposed to be, and when you go back to the flashbacks where he's a whiny dilletante, the differences are really staggering. There's also Paul Blackthorne as Detective Lance, who does a fantastic job, getting in the comedy beats without turning into comic relief, and John Barrowman, who really shines when he's let off the leash - his over-the-top diatribe in the last episode had me rolling on the floor. Others though - Laurel, for instance - not the best acting.

It's good, but not great, and not the best at the moment. I suppose it just happens to push your particular buttons, which makes it great for you, but I'd have to mark that as subjective.

Other good TV that might beat it out? Hm... Well, Game of Thrones, for one - I mean, THAT'S got amazing acting as standard, and they have such a HUGE cast to meet it. Really excellent writing, costume and set design, all that stuff as well. It's not perfect, every now and again I have a problem with the direction, or the cinematography, or the pacing - but those are exceptions to the rule.

I've been watching Elementary recently, and it's pretty good, I'd say I enjoy it about as much as I do Arrow - more character-oriented, less action. At first I was reluctant to try it, as I assumed it'd rip off BBC's Sherlock, but fortunately it goes in a different direction - it's a police procedural, not a mystery, Sherlock is manic and awkward rather than sociopathic and cold, and they do entirely different things with Moriarty, both good in their own way. Which brings me to...

BBC's Sherlock. Not technically on TV, it`s between seasons, but then again, so is Arrow at the moment, so I'd say it's fair. Hour-and-a-half episodes, really good acting and Chemistry between Benedict Cumberbatch's Sherlock and Martin Freeman's Watson. Sometimes it takes them too long to get on with solving the mystery, but that's always a risk, and I'm willing to let it slide for the other things it does right.

Hannibal's also pretty good, though it's still developing so it's too early to say - some parts of it appeal to me (devious manipulative criminal as a protagonist, good acting), whereas others do not (dream sequences, excessive gore). Any scene with Mads Mikkelsen in it is worth watching though. The combination of the framing of a shot and his acting can make a single split-second look speak volumes.

Also Doctor Who, though it has varying quality, but of late it's been pulling itself out of a hole, so getting better.

Also in hiatus, and not really live-action TV, The Legend of Korra. Bit of a non-sequitur, but dammit, I want the second season. They could at least give a date for it...


In short, Arrow's good, one of the better things on TV atm, but not the best - that goes to Game of Thrones and other things in that league (Breaking Bad's not my thing, but I respect its excellent reputation and production values). Still, I'll watch it 'til it goes bad.
 

DownTharr

New member
May 17, 2013
13
0
0
gamernerdtg2 said:
DownTharr said:
gamernerdtg2 said:
Why does Smalllvile come up when people talk about Arrow?

Game of Thrones? I'll have to check it out. I've passed it off as another excuse to show sex on TV. I hope I'm wrong.

I wasn't really talking about Cable television (HBO, Showtime, etc). I was talking about regular TV.
Game o' thrones has little sex, and the sex it has is natural (no models with fake tits, etc) and to your smallville point, there both superhero shows done well.
Arrow is a superhero show? What powers does Oliver Queen have? Deadshot is the closest character that I can think of with powers, but all the characters in Arrow are regular folk with nothing super. The comic must be different though.

We'll have to look at Game of Thrones. Not sure if natural sex is a selling point, but we'll check out the show.
Not really a selling point, it's just better then most in my opinion. Well it's DC comics and green arrow's been on the justice league, though yeah no super powers per say, its DC's version of Hawkeye.
 

wulfy42

New member
Jan 29, 2009
771
0
0
Me and my wife have watched most of the episodes. I was a long time Smallville fan, but this was the first superhero show for my wife (couldn't even get her to watch heroes!).

She is pretty bored over all by the show, and I'm more middle of the road on it. I'll watch it with her, but not by myself.

I kinda have 2 kinds of shows, ones I'll watch by myself because I like them so much (Elementary, Supernatural, Modern family etc), and ones I'll watch with my wife (Law and order SVU, Mike and Molly, The middle etc).

Arrow falls in that second category for me, so it's really up to if she wants to keep watching it, or wants to watch an episode at any time. I believe we are 2 episodes behind right now.

Personally I enjoyed Smallville much more, and even though it's a different show, it's hard not to compare it. Smallville did start off a bit slow and took awhile to grab my attention, so I have been hoping Arrow would as well.

I think the actors over all are doing a decent job, it's just that I'm not really a fan of batmanesque heroes (ones with no real powers that basically use gadgets, arrows etc to get the job done). I can enjoy shows like that, but there have been tons of them, so I'm a bit burnt out. Arrow, so far, has not brought in any really cool super powered enemies/heroes etc. That may change as time goes on, but so far it's all played out in such a way that you could pretty much believe it was happening in our universe.

I see what they are doing, trying to make it a more realistic show and get you involved in each character more then in their powers etc, but I still feel like it's missing something. There is a ton they could be doing with the DC universe, and I guess I keep waiting for them to start doing so.
 

chikusho

New member
Jun 14, 2011
873
0
0
gamernerdtg2 said:
chikusho said:
I enjoy the show, but I have a lot of issues with it.
First of all, it's stupid how he's supposed to be an expert soldier and infiltrator, yet constantly runs straight towards people spraying at him with machine guns, yet he is never touched by a bullet. They never sell the fact that he's supposed to be good at this, instead of just being blessed by some lucky fairy. I had hopes that they would be more clever about his MO, but this got turned into silly comic book very quickly. You're just supposed to assume that he's some sort of demi-god who knows all and is capable enough to get into and do anything the plot requires.

I also dislike how victimized Olivers mother is. I would have much preferred her to be more involved and convinced of The Undertaking plot. But I guess they would have to kill her off or send her to jail or something pretty soon, which would kill the opportunity for family drama.

Also, it's apparent that the central theme of this show is lying, yet they never reach any satisfying conclusions or comment on the morality of it.

With that said, the choreography is very well done, and I really like the diversity and strength of the cast.
It's visually cool, and while the whole "green eye paint" thing makes no sense, it looks pretty badass.

I think this could easily be one of the better shows on TV right now if they just chose to inject some sense and logic into it.
I would say that the central theme is tension. Relational tension. It's also something that drives the entire first season.
Arrow (the TV series version) is not a super hero, nor is anyone else on the show. I have nothing else to compare this show with except Batman, but it pulls away from Batman after the 2nd or 3rd show. His MO is reckless because he came off of an island, etc, and he doesn't know how he's going to do what his dad asked him to do...think that through some more.

I thought Moira Queen was brilliant. You seem to be more into morals and such, her character was hard to decipher until the last show - she gets what's coming to her because her character is in fact, evil...but it's not a clear cut evil, and that's why I like her character. I like how innocent she seems on the surface.
I think the outcome of the moral choices gets delayed until the last show - again, tension. In this case, tension through moral ambiguity.

I think they go a great job of showing how Oliver moves from being a looser playboy to Arrow by the island flashbacks.

Great post btw.
Granted, I've yet to watch the season finale, so maybe some of the issues I have with Moira are resolved there. It's just that I perceive her being communicated more as a victim than what really serves the story. The island parts I find are arguably the most interesting, even though I can hardly stand Olivers look and wimpy persona during those scenes. Also, I could buy his recklessness if Oliver was more clear on having some sort of death wish. Currently he just sits on way more information than the viewer just to move the story along.

But yeah, the relational tension in the show is pretty great. I still hold the opinion that most of the drama is created by lying. Oliver is lying about his secret identity (as well as his feelings) in order to "do good", Moira is lying about her involvement in the undertaking in order to "protect her family", Laurel is lying about her connection to "The Hood", and her father lied by using this connection as a means to catching him. Tommy is lying for Olivers sake, Thea is lying about her psychological state, Malcom is lying about of his status as a supervillain. Hell, even on the island, soldiers are lying by pretending to be victims of their own brutality, Yao Fei is lying to get his daughter safe. I just wish that they would strike some sort of balance here. Unless this ambiguity is the main point they are trying to make. In which case, all they've communicated is that honesty wins out every time.
Hell, the only person relatively honest is Felicity Smoak.

Oh well, I'll stop myself here. Also, thank you. :)
 

gamernerdtg2

New member
Jan 2, 2013
501
0
0
DownTharr said:
gamernerdtg2 said:
DownTharr said:
gamernerdtg2 said:
Why does Smalllvile come up when people talk about Arrow?

Game of Thrones? I'll have to check it out. I've passed it off as another excuse to show sex on TV. I hope I'm wrong.

I wasn't really talking about Cable television (HBO, Showtime, etc). I was talking about regular TV.
Game o' thrones has little sex, and the sex it has is natural (no models with fake tits, etc) and to your smallville point, there both superhero shows done well.
Arrow is a superhero show? What powers does Oliver Queen have? Deadshot is the closest character that I can think of with powers, but all the characters in Arrow are regular folk with nothing super. The comic must be different though.

We'll have to look at Game of Thrones. Not sure if natural sex is a selling point, but we'll check out the show.
Not really a selling point, it's just better then most in my opinion. Well it's DC comics and green arrow's been on the justice league, though yeah no super powers per say, its DC's version of Hawkeye.
I think Hawkeye had powers in the Avengers movie though... Will def have to check Game of Thrones. I may even chime back in on this thread about it.
 

gamernerdtg2

New member
Jan 2, 2013
501
0
0
chikusho said:
gamernerdtg2 said:
chikusho said:
Granted, I've yet to watch the season finale, so maybe some of the issues I have with Moira are resolved there. It's just that I perceive her being communicated more as a victim than what really serves the story. The island parts I find are arguably the most interesting, even though I can hardly stand Olivers look and wimpy persona during those scenes. Also, I could buy his recklessness if Oliver was more clear on having some sort of death wish. Currently he just sits on way more information than the viewer just to move the story along.

But yeah, the relational tension in the show is pretty great. I still hold the opinion that most of the drama is created by lying. Oliver is lying about his secret identity (as well as his feelings) in order to "do good", Moira is lying about her involvement in the undertaking in order to "protect her family", Laurel is lying about her connection to "The Hood", and her father lied by using this connection as a means to catching him. Tommy is lying for Olivers sake, Thea is lying about her psychological state, Malcom is lying about of his status as a supervillain. Hell, even on the island, soldiers are lying by pretending to be victims of their own brutality, Yao Fei is lying to get his daughter safe. I just wish that they would strike some sort of balance here. Unless this ambiguity is the main point they are trying to make. In which case, all they've communicated is that honesty wins out every time.
Hell, the only person relatively honest is Felicity Smoak.

Oh well, I'll stop myself here. Also, thank you. :)
Yah you really need to see the finale. There's not one character who isn't affected by their decisions. We can talk about that after you see it. Very well done. I'm not sure I'd call it lying in this context, more hiding, "smoke in mirrors" and keeping secrets. A lie is a deliberate attempt to deceive - Oliver does this throughout the show, but he does it for the "good of the city". Trust me... I really want to spoil it but he pays for it. He pays for it and thought that was well done. I love Felicity, and I love Diggle. Those are my two favorite supporting characters on the show.
Ugh, I'm looking at your response and really wishing that you'd have seen the Finale. Every character you mentioned gets addressed.
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
i like it alot.

however, i wouldn't dare list it in my top 5 shows, but it is some good fun to watch, as long as you don't go in expecting the most intricate story with the most morally of gray people around for added depth.

still, i'm enjoying the heck out of the flashback parts, really cool stuff
 

gamernerdtg2

New member
Jan 2, 2013
501
0
0
Smiley Face said:
I find it somewhat comical that you're literally calling it the best show on TV right now, but can't get the last name of half the important characters right. McQueen? Really?

It's good, but it's not great. The writing is definitely nothing out of the ordinary, a lot of the plots are downright predictable. The music is definitely nothing special. The fighting's pretty well done. You do get some really good acting from some of them - Oliver may seem wooden, but he's supposed to be, and when you go back to the flashbacks where he's a whiny dilletante, the differences are really staggering. There's also Paul Blackthorne as Detective Lance, who does a fantastic job, getting in the comedy beats without turning into comic relief, and John Barrowman, who really shines when he's let off the leash - his over-the-top diatribe in the last episode had me rolling on the floor. Others though - Laurel, for instance - not the best acting.

It's good, but not great, and not the best at the moment. I suppose it just happens to push your particular buttons, which makes it great for you, but I'd have to mark that as subjective.

Other good TV that might beat it out? Hm... Well, Game of Thrones, for one - I mean, THAT'S got amazing acting as standard, and they have such a HUGE cast to meet it. Really excellent writing, costume and set design, all that stuff as well. It's not perfect, every now and again I have a problem with the direction, or the cinematography, or the pacing - but those are exceptions to the rule.

In short, Arrow's good, one of the better things on TV atm, but not the best - that goes to Game of Thrones and other things in that league (Breaking Bad's not my thing, but I respect its excellent reputation and production values). Still, I'll watch it 'til it goes bad.
Dude, forgive my "daddy brain". I have a brand new 9 month old and it wears on you. Thank you and the other poster for catching my faux pas.

Sean Bean is enough for me to check out Game of Thrones (if his character is still alive). I haven't heard anything bad about that show. We'll have to check it out.

I'm surprised that you haven't mentioned Downton Abbey!
The season 2 finale ended very cliché in a USA soap opera way, but the rest of the show is great. BBC is hard to beat.
I'd also say that Lutheris a great show, especially the last show of Season 2.
The Brits are masters of drama, I have to say. Too many master actors and actresses... I randomly ran into Chiwetel Ejiofor in Brooklyn on an elevator! Very cool, down-to-earth person...but I digress...

As for Arrow - John Barrowman's choices in that episode were SO appropriate. It showed his character's flaw/weakness. Before the finale, I thought that the Dark Archer was too strong for Oliver Queen...he actually is too strong. I don't want to spoil though. (There you go QUEEN lol.)
Laurel Lance (Katie Cassidy) does the "Doe Eyes" thing very well...she's got a pretty and expressive face. I like the fight scenes with her earlier in the season, but they are probably done with a stunt double. There's something about Cassidy that works beyond the way she uses her eyes to convey emotion, but I haven't figured it out yet. We'll see where they take her character.

Blackthorne does a great job of convincing me that Detective Lance moves from being a brick head to someone more compassionate. He becomes a better father to Laurel, and a better character in general.

I applaud the music (Blake Neely)because he's not afraid to be rhythmic. My wife and I are musicians and composers, so we are very picky with these things. We really enjoyed his work on The Mentalist. In this current climate of rock without the "roll", a rhythmically charged, almost "funky" TV score is a very welcome thing. I love that crazy synthesized sound he uses in the end credits - he uses it during the finale very effectively.

I can't say that Breaking Bad or Dr. Who,Hannibal or the other shows you've mentioned have caught my interest. I will check out Game of Thrones. I highly recommend Downton Abbey if you're into relational drama, and Luther. Idris Elba is the man, and Ruth Wilson as Alice Morgan...again I won't spoil.
 

gamernerdtg2

New member
Jan 2, 2013
501
0
0
gmaverick019 said:
i like it alot.

however, i wouldn't dare list it in my top 5 shows, but it is some good fun to watch, as long as you don't go in expecting the most intricate story with the most morally of gray people around for added depth.

still, i'm enjoying the heck out of the flashback parts, really cool stuff
Moira Queen is pretty dagone grey until the last few episodes.
The story is woven together very well, and since you liked the island stuff, I'm sure they'll tie in those characters during the 2nd season. I'm very curious how that's going to be done.
 

gamernerdtg2

New member
Jan 2, 2013
501
0
0
Atmos Duality said:
I choose hidden option 5: I've seen it, and I think it's bad.
Not awful, not insulting. Just tepid and bad.
LOL - I should have made that an option actually.

Tepid means - lacking in passion, force, or zest. No enthusiasm, or conviction.

I totally disagree with you there. At the very least, the fight scenes and the island scenes are full of "force", passion and conviction.

But I seriously should have made your option one of the choices.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
gamernerdtg2 said:
LOL - I should have made that an option actually.

Tepid means - lacking in passion, force, or zest. No enthusiasm, or conviction.

I totally disagree with you there. At the very least, the fight scenes and the island scenes are full of "force", passion and conviction.

But I seriously should have made your option one of the choices.
The passion they're presenting doesn't move me; usually, the "DR-DR-DR-DRAAAMA" annoys me more than anything, though I understand what they're going for.

I dunno. Something about the show just puts me off.
 

SirDeadly

New member
Feb 22, 2009
1,400
0
0
It's currently my second favourite show behind Game of Thrones. I can't wait for season 2! I actually liked the female characters unlike most people it seems, that probably has something to do with some of them being quite good looking though.
 

Smiley Face

New member
Jan 17, 2012
704
0
0
gamernerdtg2 said:
Thanks for the suggestions. I was enjoying Downton Abbey, but it got too soapy for me, and I just had to stop watching a few episodes into Season 3 - I'll pick it up again, eventually, if only because I compulsively finish things, but I had to put it away for now. As for Luther, it's caught my eye a few times now, I keep hearing good things about it, so I'll definitely check it out some time in the next few weeks.

And yeah, Game of Thrones... it's not that it excels in one particular area, but that it does it in so many. It's really something else.


Captcha: dueling banjos. That sounds pretty awesome.
 

TyrunnAlberyn

Senior Member
Apr 1, 2010
129
11
23
Is it a really fun show? Hell yeah, although me saying that might be in part to me simply being a huge nerd for things like this. Is it the "best"? I rather doubt it, it suffers from some problems that tend to kick my suspension of disbelief down a notch if I pay attention to them (not the least the fact that it's yet another show where there are no ugly people unless they're out and out villains, because that is so obviously like the real world... oh wait... ;)).

As for all the people blindly singing the praises of Game of Thrones... this is for you:
 

Goofguy

New member
Nov 25, 2010
3,864
0
0
It's an entertaining show with good production values but it is far from the best show on TV. Some of the acting is cringe worthy, particularly anything involving Laurel or Thea's love lives. And Detective Lance's scenes can be painful to watch due to how bad he is at his job and how he is consistently assigned to cases involving the Queen family when there is a clear conflict of interest.

However, I do really like the flashback scenes. They've all been good and each relates well to the corresponding present day plot of that episode. I'm looking forward to the next season.
 

Edguy

New member
Jan 31, 2011
210
0
0
Goofguy said:
It's an entertaining show with good production values but it is far from the best show on TV. Some of the acting is cringe worthy, particularly anything involving Laurel or Thea's love lives. And Detective Lance's scenes can be painful to watch due to how bad he is at his job and how he is consistently assigned to cases involving the Queen family when there is a clear conflict of interest.

However, I do really like the flashback scenes. They've all been good and each relates well to the corresponding present day plot of that episode. I'm looking forward to the next season.
This pretty much sums up my quarrels with the show, as well.