Well since the extended version of James Camerons Avatar comes out today I decided that since a few threads discussing Avatar covered all the basics, except one. Who did you want to win? I have seen a few threads about Avatar and appearantly some people wanted the humans to win. So which side did you want coming out on top and most importantly why?
I myself cannot really decide who's fault the whole thing was. The Na'vi were extreamly hostile, didn't want to negotiate, had a superiority complex (both sides did) and refused any sort of agreement where both sides could benifit. The humans were there for a fuel for space travel (unobtainium is that fuel for those who didn't know), but didn't respect the Na'vi's ways because in their minds it was tribal ritual bullshit, they tried many ways to negotiate with them (even making Na'vi clones as advocates), offered them some technology to assist them (refused) and their mining process was rather destructive to the planet.
I guess I'll side with humans for now, they wanted to negotiate, not start a war (some did but wouldn't start it). If there is something I left out which proves that they were comeplete bastards then please tell me.
I myself cannot really decide who's fault the whole thing was. The Na'vi were extreamly hostile, didn't want to negotiate, had a superiority complex (both sides did) and refused any sort of agreement where both sides could benifit. The humans were there for a fuel for space travel (unobtainium is that fuel for those who didn't know), but didn't respect the Na'vi's ways because in their minds it was tribal ritual bullshit, they tried many ways to negotiate with them (even making Na'vi clones as advocates), offered them some technology to assist them (refused) and their mining process was rather destructive to the planet.
I guess I'll side with humans for now, they wanted to negotiate, not start a war (some did but wouldn't start it). If there is something I left out which proves that they were comeplete bastards then please tell me.