Poll: Bannable Fetishes

Recommended Videos

Seldon2639

New member
Feb 21, 2008
1,756
0
0
The fundamental question I have (this time brought up by two separate threads I just finished reading) is this:

Is there a fetish so disturbing that you'd want to ban all forms of media which depicts it? Is there a paraphilia so unabashedly "wrong" that you're willing to play thought police to make sure it doesn't exist in any media anyone can make, distribute, or look at?

I don't mean things like "would you stop someone from abusing a child and posting the pictures", so we're assuming that no harm befalls anyone from the creation, distribution, or consumption of this material, except that it's just patently disgusting. Is virtual child pornography wrong enough that you'd want it completely gone, rape porn, snuff porn? Or is it "as long as no one gets hurt, whatever floats your boat"?
 

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
The existence of some fetishes can harm those it depicts or involves, see Rape. But many are acceptable... and fun...

But yes, I agree that as long and nobody gets hurt everything it just fine, provided that we take into account that more than just the description of the act can cause the hurt.
 

Ravensong

New member
Jun 1, 2009
13
0
0
As long as no one's getting hurt or flaunting any laws to begin with I suppose what happens in peoples bedrooms can be shared with whoever's willing to watch (and your willing to let watch).
 

CuddlyCombine

New member
Sep 12, 2007
1,142
0
0
madbird-valiant said:
As long as no one is getting harmed in the process, and it isn't being flaunted in every one of the internet's tubes, I don't care how disgusting porn gets. If you don't rub it in my face, and you don't cut children or something, I don't care what floats your boat. Doesn't mean it'll float mine.
This. Freedom of expression, people.
 

wwjdftw

New member
Mar 27, 2009
568
0
0
dude it depends , have you seen some of the weird ass shit there is out there? i mean goddamn, theres a video heres the first word* "putrid" christ, THAT SHOULD BE BANNED.


*i dont want to get banned for scarring some little kiddie
 

Kiutu

New member
Sep 27, 2008
1,787
0
0
Fictional porn depicting simulated fetishes is fine. Hard to look at for some, yes, but just don't look at it.
 

TZer0

New member
Jan 22, 2008
543
0
0
Do whatever you want to do as long as it doesn't hurt anyone (unless they want it to hurt) and you keep it away from me.
 

Seldon2639

New member
Feb 21, 2008
1,756
0
0
wwjdftw said:
dude it depends , have you seen some of the weird ass shit there is out there? i mean goddamn, theres a video heres the first word* "putrid" christ, THAT SHOULD BE BANNED.


*i dont want to get banned for scarring some little kiddie
I've not seen most of the really weird stuff personally, but I have heard tell. But, how do you ban the things you find disturbing without opening the door to someone else banning things you like which he finds disturbing?

Who gets to be the final arbiter of "this is just too gross"?
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,749
6
43
Country
USA
I really don't see a problem as long as the individuals don't let it evolve into something deeper. If you're the type of guy who gets off on cartoon CP, I will still look down on you, but I really wont care unless you take it into the real world.

I'm forgiving when it comes to fetishes, because it's not like your really choose them yourself. You only choose how you handle it outside of your mind.
 

NiceGurl_14

New member
Aug 14, 2008
559
0
0
I'm along with a lot of the other comments, It's all good if that's what your into, just don't flaunt it at me.
 

Zer_

Rocket Scientist
Feb 7, 2008
2,682
0
0
Signa said:
I really don't see a problem as long as the individuals don't let it evolve into something deeper. If you're the type of guy who gets off on cartoon CP, I will still look down on you, but I really wont care unless you take it into the real world.

I'm forgiving when it comes to fetishes, because it's not like your really choose them yourself. You only choose how you handle it outside of your mind.
You've pretty much said what I think.
 

CircuitDruid

New member
May 19, 2009
38
0
0
you need a 'theres only one or two things that are unforgivable' clause.

what furries do to each other creeps me out but its none of my business. rape and torture is wrong, but if its staged no one is getting hurt, then I don't believe we have a right to do anything other than censor it and disapprove.

you cant stage pedophilia, so its 100% wrong. no excuses.

You don't have a pole option to cover that :p

Still acceptability aside, if its sick and twisted I really don't want to hear about it eh? keep it to yourselves :p just be grateful if your laws have a freedom of speech clause, because most of us don't.
 

crypt-creature

New member
May 12, 2009
585
0
0
Beastiality is something I think should be banned.

But other fetishes... some of them are disgusting, but if no one is being hurt, and if it doesn't cause a person to hurt someone else, then I just don't want to see it or be aware of it.
 

CircuitDruid

New member
May 19, 2009
38
0
0
Kukul said:
Jarrid said:
I'm an Absolutist, it's either all acceptable or liberty is in jeopardy.
That.
But I wouldn't mind a band of skinheads beating the shit out of some sick fucks out there.
that's why we have vigilante forum justice >:D condemn them with our bad language and violent words as if it makes a difference! :D

It doesn't, but makes us feel better and superior eh?
 

Sebenko

New member
Dec 23, 2008
2,531
0
0
Yeah, sure. In private is fine.

Go walk your lover around your house on a leash all you like, but don't go walking them in a park.