Poll: Best fighting game franchise?

Recommended Videos

Dreiko_v1legacy

New member
Aug 28, 2008
4,696
0
0
Odysseous2 said:
For everyone who's wondering why so many of their more obscure favorites were left out of the poll, please remember that there are only 8 possible slots. The franchises I listed are arguably the most known/renowned, so if your favorite just happens to be something else, well, there's an "Other" option for a reason.
That's the thing, here we're arguing so as to show that they're not.


Mortal Kombat has been a joke for the last 15 years and just last year released one game that wasn't as horrible as the last 10 of them.

Super Smash Brothers is a party game whose depth stemmed from the glitches that were overlooked by the devs and by it's community cutting away 90% of the content in order to make is as playable as actual fighting games. It's also (brawl especially) widely considered a party game over a fighter by most fighting game experts.



Guilty Gear isn't obscure, it has been out since 1998, has over 10 games and has been renown as one of the best fighters ever to the fighting game community. Blazblue, it's spiritual successor, has received raving reviews, ones even found on THIS site too, as well as awards for best fighter of the year etc. It's an egregious series of oversights to not mention either of them.
 

Manji187

New member
Jan 29, 2009
1,444
0
0
Odysseous2 said:
I agree with a lot of what you're saying, but I think we're on two different pages here lol. Of course it would be impossible to objectively prove that one thing is better than another if they are different things -- Again, Tekken and Soul Calibur, or Battlefield and Bulletstorm. But the fact of the matter is, when someone asks you what the "best" of something is, you're likely never going to actually prove your choice objectively. It all comes down to opinion in the end, and that's why it's possible to compare largely different franchises of the same genre.

If you ask me which is better, Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe or the MK 2011 release, I might say the 2011 release because it's on a 2-dimensional plane. But that's not to say a 2D plane is a better gameplay style than a 3D plane... It all comes down to what appeals to me personally. If you venture out to prove that 2D is better than 3D, you'll never do it objectively because both have their pros and cons. It all comes down to which of those pros and cons mean the most to us as individuals.

*takes a deep breath*

So yeah, if this thread was about finding the definitive "right answer" to the best fighting franchise, then these comparisons would be impossible. But it's not, and that's why the votes are spread so evenly. Because everyone has their personal favorite, regardless of how difficult they all are to objectively compare.
Well, that explains a lot (no sarcasm). In that case I find the name of the thread somewhat misleading. It would be more accurate to name it "the best fighting franchise to you/ for you" or "the fighting franchise you like best". Or was that implicit somehow, us being on an internet forum and all? I guess I just made the hasty assumption that it was supposed to be a REAL comparison...based on objective criteria, not subjective evaluation. Oh well, I guess I have learned something.
 

Ghengis John

New member
Dec 16, 2007
2,209
0
0
Odysseous2 said:
I personally like Dead or Alive, The King Of Fighters, Blazblue, Guilty Gear, Virtua Fighter, Arcana Heart, Melty Blood and anything else you left off the list.

But seriously, not putting KOF on your list is like saying "Don't vote... MEXICO!" and Blazblue's pretty huge right now. I know you only have so much list space but Smash Brothers? Well I guess somebody's gonna be happy about it.

But there's nothing quite like a well-balanced fighting game where a skilled player can feed a novice their own ass before they know what's what. So, what franchise is best?
Ahhhh quoted for so much truth. There was a time in soul calibur two I'll always remember fondly... Taki had EXC and life was good.
 

Dreiko_v1legacy

New member
Aug 28, 2008
4,696
0
0
Funnily enough a lot of people here mentioned smash brothers, it's just that those kind of people (no offense) are not serious fighting game players but are more on the casual side, thus haven't even scratched the surface of other, deep, good fighting games or have expressed that they're unwilling to do as much out of lack of skill and lack of desire to WORK to obtain such skill. (which is yeah, a part of most fighting games, just a thing about it thought, working for your skill in a good fighting game is also fun, it needs to be noted)
 

Soxafloppin

Coxa no longer floppin'
Jun 22, 2009
7,918
0
0
Mortal Kombat, Yea like others have said its not deep, and its only recently became tournament viable, but my god its fun, and Content! It beats out any other fighting game (Except maybe SSB) in sheer content.
 

CLC Akira

New member
Jul 6, 2011
20
0
0
I voted other because Virtua Fighter wasn't on the list but in all honesty I love all fighting games.
 

ColeusRattus

New member
Apr 16, 2009
220
0
0
Me too, I have a soft spot for Virtua Fighter, so I'd have voted for that if it were on the list.

BlazBlue is great too.

But I don't understand the craze about Smash Brothers. It's just not fun, at all. At least for me. And nope, it didn't get more fun with two to four players either.
 

Logodaedalus

New member
Aug 14, 2011
27
0
0
When it comes down to it fighters for me are not about carefully thought out comboes and cutting edge graphics, they are about fast paced action to be played on the couch with friends, and for that Super Smash Bros. has no equal.

Not only can you have tons of zany and hilarious moves, its entire system is much more gratifieing (spelling?). Kicking someone and watching a healthbar go back a bit is good and all, but it does not compete with the "OMG LOLZ OWNED!!" factor that sending someone flying at Mach 1 across the screen gives. This is particularly true when it ends with a large bang and when said person is sitting next to you.
 

L3W15 M

New member
Jul 28, 2011
129
0
0
I said other although super smash bros would be my second choice closely followed by MK
I say other because the dragon ball fighting games have always been the best to me. So many characters and so much hectic action. the ability to fly and destroy your battlefield and of course the childhood memories that go with the characters. So thats my choice.
 

StormShaun

The Basement has been unleashed!
Feb 1, 2009
6,948
0
0
I love the...

Tekken Series and Soul Calibur series because of their non confusing gameplay unlike Street Button masher fighter 4, and Soul Calibur because of the same reason and because of their character customisation.

Also Blaz Blue was awesome because they made fighting quite easy and awesome, while making the story as a visual novel which I love.
 

Sleepy Sol

New member
Feb 15, 2011
1,831
0
0
Street Fighter...or BlazBlue. When I lose in those games it doesn't feel like I got cheated unlike a certain other game named MvC3. Admittedly I didn't try to get into Mortal Kombat much but I don't think I would like it as much as I do those two.
 

Odysseous2

New member
Jul 19, 2011
82
0
0
Dreiko said:
Mortal Kombat has been a joke for the last 15 years and just last year released one game that wasn't as horrible as the last 10 of them.
It's been a joke for you. But the series has been getting enough support over the years to actually *last* for this long, and that means a lot of people would disagree with you. Even if Mortal Kombat *is* a joke, the fact still stands that it's been around for almost 20 years now and it's a household name in fighters. You really can't argue that Mortal Kombat doesn't belong on the list. It's right up there with Street Fighter as one of the most popular fighting franchises ever.

Dreiko said:
Super Smash Brothers is a party game whose depth stemmed from the glitches that were overlooked by the devs and by it's community cutting away 90% of the content in order to make is as playable as actual fighting games. It's also (brawl especially) widely considered a party game over a fighter by most fighting game experts.
By most fighting game experts? I didn't realize you could major in "fighting game nomenclature" in grad school. I'm just as much an expert as anyone else, considering I've played through every game on the poll and ALMOST every game people are mentioning (except Dead or Alive). And if you're wondering, then no, I'm not a Nintendo fanboy. As a matter of fact, I have absolutely no respect for Nintendo at the moment. So no, I didn't put Super Smash Bros up there because I'm a fan of the series. I put it up there because it's popular. And, all things considered, it's a game where you choose one of a bunch of characters and use them to beat up another one of a bunch of characters. That's the premise of just about all fighting games. And, as you can see by the results, people seem to agree that SSB is a good fighter. Sure, it might be less deep than others, and it might be designed to play with friends, but that doesn't evict it from the genre. It's very possible for a game to be both a fighter and a party game at once. (And this is coming from a so-called "expert")



Dreiko said:
Guilty Gear isn't obscure, it has been out since 1998, has over 10 games and has been renown as one of the best fighters ever to the fighting game community. Blazblue, it's spiritual successor, has received raving reviews, ones even found on THIS site too, as well as awards for best fighter of the year etc. It's an egregious series of oversights to not mention either of them.
Yeah, I've heard this story before. Every single franchise listed on the poll has more or less the same history. Street Fighter and Mortal Kombat started as arcade games in 1991 and 1992 respectively. Since then, both have been consistently evolving to fit with the newer generations of technology while at the same time being hugely supported by their respective fanbases. They're household names. They belong on the list.

If I'm not mistaken, the original Marvel vs. Capcom was released in 1995 as an arcade game, and was instantly deemed the "greatest fighting game of all time" by most fans of the genre. At the time, MvC was about as deep and advanced as the genre got. And all the critic acclaim of Marvel vs. Capcom 3 means that, yes, it still holds the same reputation today. That belongs on the list.

Super Smash Bros, I already covered.

If you remember, Soul Calibur started out as Soul Edge, which was released in 1996 as an arcade game. It was the second fully 3D fighting game ever to be released (the first being some obscure arcade release that nobody's played). Also, at the time, it was an oddity for fighting games to feature weapons. If you remember, not even Mortal Kombat had much of the arsenal it uses today. Most characters just fought bare-fisted, because that's the way fighting games were. Soul Calibur changed that, as well as fixed the misconception that fighters could only be played on a 2D plane. That belongs on the list.

Tekken's first game was in 1994, and though it didn't do much in the ways of innovation, it's a series that's held in high esteem by most gamers, not just fighting enthusiasts. It's probably the third most popular name in fighters, just below Street Fighter and Mortal Kombat. And, if I remember correctly, it was the first fighting game to be completely loyal to actual martial arts (that is, every move the characters use is something possible in real life. No hadoukens, no flaming breath). I don't know if it's still that way today, as I haven't played very much Tekken lately, but its historical significance still stands. That belongs on the list.

I'm not downgrading Guilty Gear's importance. I'm just saying that it's not quite in the league that these legendary fighters are in. Again, I would have listed more, but there are only 8 slots. And yes, I *did* feel that the "all fighting games suck" choice was necessary.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Odysseous2 said:
Well, your candor on the matter is appreciated. Having been a poll-meister myself plenty of times, I don't blame you, so thank you for the 'Other' column. As for me...

Street Fighter is nice, but I feel not much has changed since I played Street Fighter II (the reason being I can just pick up SF4 and play just as well as I did long ago). Can anyone tell my why Bison's been inflated with a bicycle pump?

I'm an old player of Mortal Kombat. HOWEVER...it's taken years on end for them to get back to MKIIs level, and I say that because MK9 compares well with it, straight down to bullshitty Shao Kahn, which all of us older players are use to.

M. VS C. ummm... *Shrugs* Haven't played it and don't read enough comics. Deadpool was a nice touch.

Super Smash? Fun and funny, but better for tournaments.

Soul Calibur... Thing is, I bought 3 because it was more than just a fighting game and had character creation too. Then, years later, after some cajoling, I bought SC4 for 20 bucks and...meh. It's JUST a fighting game again.

Tekken? Never played it.

So, I'm throwing in my Other vote for Blazblue.
 
Jun 11, 2008
5,331
0
0
Odysseous2 said:
Yeah, a lot of the time, fighting games come down to a contest of who can mash buttons the fastest. But there's nothing quite like a well-balanced fighting game where a skilled player can feed a novice their own ass before they know what's what. So, what franchise is best?

I'd have to go for Mortal Kombat myself. I know, it's not very deep, and it's mostly about the spectacle... But I love it all the same.

EDIT: I'm well aware that Guilty Gear and BlazBlue have been left off the list. If it's *that* important to you, see my response to Dreiko on page 3 to know why.
Just curious as you obviously know it exist why not call Soul Calibur its proper name the Soul Series as it does contain Soul Edge/Blade.

OT: I am between DoA, Soul series and BlazBlue as they all bring something different to the table.