EzraPound said:
It was released in '87 -- two years before I was born -- so yeah.
Z(ombie)fan said:
Nyrad01 said:
I went to vote Bioshock but I think I clicked Metroid by accident... I think Bioshock was the best of them, it was very inventive, and was one of the few games that have actually scared my before
I hate when BIoSHock is praised for "being inventive"
play system shock 2. came out 7-9 years earlier, is a better game, And features verything BIoshock has And More. Including story (the Frame of the story, anyway. and several enemies -splicers are SS2's hybrids. Big Daddies are SS2's maintnence bots, Security bots Are SS2's turrets only mobilized.
MY favorite? DOOM. especially the Various Ports of it, They added some nice Paranoia fuel to the mix.
ANyone remember the PS1 version? that had my eyes bugging out of my head, let me tell you... fricken darkness everywhere...
Agreed -- SS2 is a vastly superior game to BioShock; the latter reflecting how little the FPS genre has changed in the ensuing years.
Calling System Shock 2 "vastly superior" is most certainly a ridiculous exaggeration. Sure, Bioshock isn't exactly "inventive" in any aspect aside from the story, but it does well by improving upon the formula that made System Shock great. Yes, the RPG elements are dumbed down several degrees in Bioshock, but I think we can all agree that System Shock 2's combat system was certainly not the best, even for that time. Bioshock makes the combat much better, provides an excellent and compelling narrative, features an awe inspiring setting, and wraps it all up in a beautiful package.
Which one is better is obviously a matter of opinion, however, I do not believe either can be considered "vastly superior" of another one as they are essentially the same game, just with different things that they do well.