It isn't in America either, although it's probably the best quality for cost.ThePlasmatizer said:Over here in England it's not even the cheapest blu ray player.
What? PS3 has trophies which are virtually identical to achievements.Bob_F_It said:Online gaming + friends and shit - Live and pointless achievements.
You have a pretty weird sense of humourCodgo said:I find the "HD gaming at its best" option hilarious.
For most, I'm not sure it's that cut and dry. The comfort of the controller is a big issue for me. The cost, the reliability, the extra features, and non-gaming capabilities are all big factors for others, as well.the rusk said:Concerning the question it just comes down to what game exclusives you prefer.
Huh? That's a problem with the game, not the console. It says right in the article that the 360 version did it, too. Why you threw the word lightweight in there too, is a little peculiar. This sort of reeks of fanboyism. Leaving out half of the facts and throwing in pointless flavor words.Eggo said:How exactly is the PS3 considered "HD gaming at its best" when it can't even run a lightweight game like Call of Duty 4 at even 720p (the lowest HD resolution)?
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/11/22/call-of-duty-4-not-hd-only-600p-claim-pixel-counters/
Haha.