Poll: Brink Reviews

Recommended Videos

AlexNora

New member
Mar 7, 2011
207
0
0
de5gravity said:
R4V3NSFAN1976 said:
G4. 2/5. Read the review.
Everyone's entitled to their own opinion of course, but you do realize that the reviewer reviewed a multiplayer game before it came out, by saying the campaign isn't that great and playing online with bots. With. Bots. And then complaining that it's not really entertaining. Well duh!

Guys, rent it if you have to, but make your own opinion of the game.
I wonder how Yahtzee would review it then?
 

NathLines

New member
May 23, 2010
689
0
0
I didn't expect the game to get smashing reviews or anything(looks pretty meh to me), but 6? I can't believe it. Not a chance.

EDIT: Oh, right. The poll. No, I wasn't planning on getting it anyway.
 

Agayek

Ravenous Gormandizer
Oct 23, 2008
5,178
0
0
Been playing Brink for the last couple hours, and I have to say I quite like it.

The only real problem with it, IMO, is that it desperately needs a tutorial of some kind to cover all of the objectives, movement/parkour abilities and whatnot.
 

de5gravity

New member
Apr 18, 2011
295
0
0
D_987 said:
de5gravity said:
Guys, rent it if you have to, but make your own opinion of the game.
So again, why are you even posting here?

If they played the Multi-player game with bots, so did the reviewers who gave the game a high score. Or more likely they were given review copies and played the game on the developers version of Xbox Live / at LAN events. There's no way Splash Damage would let any outlet put a review out there without playing the multi-player extensively.
I'm not saying believe the good reviews and discard the bad reviews. I linked to good reviews to balance out the OP's post, acting like the game was critically panned, which is not what is happening for the moment. I'm saying make your own opinion of the game.

AlexNora said:
de5gravity said:
R4V3NSFAN1976 said:
G4. 2/5. Read the review.
Everyone's entitled to their own opinion of course, but you do realize that the reviewer reviewed a multiplayer game before it came out, by saying the campaign isn't that great and playing online with bots. With. Bots. And then complaining that it's not really entertaining. Well duh!

Guys, rent it if you have to, but make your own opinion of the game.
I wonder how Yahtzee would review it then?
Yahtzee is amazing, and I'm sad to say I'm a bit of a fanboy, but his videos are pure entertainment. If you listened to him, you would probably only play Silent Hill 2, Prince of Persia, and Saints Row 2
 

Grey_Focks

New member
Jan 12, 2010
1,969
0
0
Just spent the past 3 hours playing it, and I must say it's pretty good so far. The campaign is actually pretty interesting and the challenges are, appropriately enough, challenging. Also, thank the maker, a PC FPS with lean! my old friend, how I have missed you so.

I haven't actually played any MP yet, but I'm waiting till tomorrow (today...) when people are actually all on. So far, my only real complaints are that the classes really play just about identical to each other, and that it feels like the health boost you get from the "heavy" body is just plain pitiful when you consider how much speed you give up, even compared to the medium body. Other than that, the gameplay itself is tight, the customization is just as deep as it was promised to be, the art style is awesome....really, so far the good outweighs the bad by a mile. Can't wait to wake up tomorrow and play some more, hopefully with some of my steam friends.
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
de5gravity said:
I'm not saying believe the good reviews and discard the bad reviews. I linked to good reviews to balance out the OP's post, acting like the game was critically panned, which is not what is happening for the moment. I'm saying make your own opinion of the game.
No you're not; you're questioning [incorrectly], the validity of a review that gave the game a low score. And it's the second outlet you've done that to on this thread alone. And reviews exist to inform and allow people to judge, after looking at the spread of reviews, when compared to the rest of the shooter market people should be able to tell, pretty quickly, that Brink is a shooter devoid of content with a number of poor design decisions that is still a fun game.

I doubt anyone has the time or money to rent every game they might be interested in buying.
 

Gigathrash

New member
Apr 28, 2010
77
0
0
ShadowAurora said:
Gigathrash said:
I wasn't planning on picking it up anyway right away, probably will bargain bin it later. I would wait for the review here or by Blistered Thumbs before I formulate an opinion.
your going to formulate your opinion after reading someone elses opinion

are you really that dense
Well, it's either that or blindly purchase a game because there isn't a demo. I trust the opinion of Angry Joe and Zeitgeist Reviews because my opinion has coincided with them for the large majority of games that I have gotten that they have reviewed. If there was a demo I would play that and form my own, but there isn't, and there are no plans. I'm not going to throw anything more then $10 at it in a couple of years if I have no idea what I'm purchasing.
 

KnowYourOnion

New member
Jul 6, 2009
425
0
0
ShadowAurora said:
Gigathrash said:
I wasn't planning on picking it up anyway right away, probably will bargain bin it later. I would wait for the review here or by Blistered Thumbs before I formulate an opinion.
your going to formulate your opinion after reading someone elses opinion

are you really that dense
Coming from the man who can't use punctuation or use the correct version of YOU'RE, supreme irony..........Don't be unpleasant on these forums please

OT: it looks like a pretty cool game, it'd be a shame if it wasn't up to scratch.
 

RedEyesBlackGamer

The Killjoy Detective returns!
Jan 23, 2011
4,701
0
0
D_987 said:
A 6 out of 10 is above average.
You'd have to be very naive to beleive that.
It is. People have convinced themselves that anything below a 8 is terrible. I regularly purchase games with lukewarm reviews (Hyper Dimension Neptunia, Record of Agarest War) and enjoy the heck out of them.
 

Yoh3333

New member
Feb 7, 2011
159
0
0
RedEyesBlackGamer said:
D_987 said:
A 6 out of 10 is above average.
You'd have to be very naive to beleive that.
It is. People have convinced themselves that anything below a 8 is terrible. I regularly purchase games with lukewarm reviews (Hyper Dimension Neptunia, Record of Agarest War) and enjoy the heck out of them.
I kinda agree with him.
Point was not that anything below 8 is bad, it's just that so many other games are getting reviews of 8.5 or higher and therefore, all "good" games are over 8.5 while all "average games" are below that. That's atleast how i feel about review scores.
 

Zing

New member
Oct 22, 2009
2,069
0
0
Well I was never going to buy it anyway, nothing about it looked overly impressive. But now I probably won't bother renting it. I'll save my money for The Witcher 2
 

sheogoraththemad

New member
Feb 6, 2010
921
0
0
it still looks fun, I trust Bethesda and I don't trust IGN, only for their guides.
I think I still give it a shot, an FPS that let's me do more movements than jump and crouch looks fun
 

teebeeohh

New member
Jun 17, 2009
2,896
0
0
i won't cancel my preorder. a lot of negative points were about the lack of on-hit kills from sniper/shotguns and grenades and this is working as intended. The only thing i could get behind is that the game maxes out to soon(level-wise) but this can easily be corrected with DLC/mappacks.

the only downside this game has for me is that the European release is 4 days before the witcher 2
 

Netrigan

New member
Sep 29, 2010
1,924
0
0
D_987 said:
It's amusing that if IGN give a game a high score they're classed as "payed off", whilst if they go against the norm and give a lower score they're classed as not handing out a high score because they weren't payed off; and if they give a game, a now middling score, of 7 or 8 they're being "safe".

They can't win...

I do get the impression from a number of posts on this thread, however, that you don't really want a fair score. You want a high score to justify your hype for the game, that's why you're desperately clinging onto the reviews over 7.5 whilst insulting those outlets [at least in the case of IGN] that gave the game a score below that.
Popular franchises tend to get really good reviews because reviewers who are fans of the franchise are the ones reviewing it 99 times out of a 100. They're honest within that context (although they're always willing to gloss over faults that dominate user reviews), but their reaction is pretty much guaranteed to be positive unless the franchise takes a dramatic left turn.

New franchise is always going to score lower for that reason. No one knows exactly what to expect from the game, so critics are going in with no real expectation of enjoying the game.

And peaking at the reviews so far, it sounds like my impression is more or less correct. The solo campaign (the entire reason I play these things) isn't really that interesting. Since I don't care overly much for MP, I think I can safely give this one a miss... but I hope that SMART system makes its way into other games.
 

BlueSinbad

New member
Oct 18, 2010
319
0
0
Reviews are all subjective, I never buy a game based on reviews, If I really want the game, like I do Brink, I'll get it.