Poll: but, I KNOW the earth is flat!

Recommended Videos

Quiet Stranger

New member
Feb 4, 2006
4,409
0
0
Erana said:
You've phrased this well, but people just get all angry with me for going, "prove to me that the Earth is round.
The science you're using is just evidence suggesting something. I have plenty of evidence about its flatness all around!"
with the conversation going on and on.

Reality is all in our heads; I don't know if any of it is real or not, but I just roll with it.
This is where existentialism comes in.
theres plenty of evidence that the earth is round, also I wouldnt think too much about it, like the second poster *head asplodes*
 

Treefingers

New member
Aug 1, 2008
1,071
0
0
OmegaXzors said:
There is one question with an undeniable answer: religion is false when it comes to Science.
...?

Irrelevant statement. Do not want flamewar kthnxbai!!
 

PurePareidolia

New member
Nov 26, 2008
354
0
0
Short answer: Literally speaking we can't have perfect knowledge. Practically speaking we can.

Long answer: All knowledge should be amendable to future evidence, but that doesn't mean there aren't things that we can say we know for sure - mathematics for one. There are things that have been established to such a high degree it would take such massive evidence to change them that it's a pretty safe bet they won't change any time soon and it's an even safer bet that if they do, it won't involve completely throwing out the old theory - Newton's laws are horribly outdated, but they still work well enough so we don't throw them out.

Even if Hydrogen was two functionally identical atoms that couldn't be discerned using any method we know, the periodic table makes detailed, useful predictions, all of which are fulfilled 100% of the time. That means it's either the truth and we know about how elements behave, or it's a perfectly predictive model of how elements behave, indistinguishable from the truth. At that point, any difference is so insignificant, we can't distinguish between the two so for all intents and purposes, we can just say the model and the truth are one in the same. Hence for practical purposes, we can know things.

To put it mathematically, what's the difference between 1 and 0.999...recurring?
The answer: none, they're mathematically identical. Similar principle.
 

The Thief

New member
Apr 24, 2008
315
0
0
I know what I know is what I know because I choose to accept it as such. What I know could be wrong, but I don't bother reevaluating what I know unless it is called into question by contradiction.

I know the earth is round. If tomorrow I step off the edge, I might change my mind.
 

Berethond

New member
Nov 8, 2008
6,474
0
0
I don't really know.
Really, how do I know that I exist?
What if I'm dreaming?
What if I'm in someone else's dream?
If I'm in someone else's dream, what happens when they wake up?

You know, sometimes I pretend like you internet people are all figments of my imagination. It's great fun.
 

Klarinette

New member
May 21, 2009
1,173
0
0
Things I know, I know them in the sense that it is my general understanding of them, and what I accept them to be. Knowing is the interpretation of the individual... or something.
 

major28

New member
Feb 25, 2010
459
0
0
a wise man once said there two ways to know to be confident in everything you know "to beleive everything or to beleive nothing both lead to maddness" i like the deep forum
 

Lonan

New member
Dec 27, 2008
1,243
0
0
Ameatypie said:
Being an epistemology (a branch of philosophy) student, I naturally ask questions. The main question, the main focus of the course is around "how do we KNOW what we know?". Here is a little background knowledge to help you out when it comes to answering this...

Plato, an ancient philosopher, defined knowledge as a "justified true belief." This is the definition of knowledge that is commonly accepted as THE definition of knowledge by almost all philosophers today. You must recognize knowledge as something that is a) specific to individuals, and b) attached to emotion. Back in the day, people KNEW that the earth was flat because it was justified (they could see!), true to individuals, and people believed it. They KNEW, this was their knowledge. The reason there cannot be knowledge without emotion is because believing something requires emotion as a backing force.

Anyways, the question! Do we REALLY know what we know? How can you be certain that, say, you are reading this? What is telling you that you are reading this? How do you know your computer is the color that it is? How do you know who your mother is? How do you know that you look as you do? How do you know the earth is round?

I have formulated my own answer to this and will update here soon, so keep checking back!
All of this is true except the earth being flat. While everyone has their own way of viewing the earth being round, this remains a fact. Also, most people thought the world was round for over two thousand years. The idea that it isn't was brought up by an American in the 19th century. He was largely dismissed then as his organisation is now (the Flat Earth Society)
 

Godavari

New member
Aug 6, 2009
842
0
0
Well, I got as far as "I think, therefore I am," but after that I really have no idea how to prove/disprove that something is true. I just give my knowledge the benefit of the doubt.
 

smudgey

New member
May 8, 2008
347
0
0
Ameatypie said:
Do we REALLY know what we know?
Of course we know what we know. How else would we know it? Shouldn't the question be "Is what we know actually true?" In which case, yes it is. At least until we're proven wrong.
 

Yokai

New member
Oct 31, 2008
1,982
0
0
It's a good point. Reminds me of one of those wonderfully bizarre Daniel Pinkwater books, in which the main character is told by his uncle Los Angeles doesn't exist. "Ridiculous," he says. "Everyone knows about Los Angeles. Hell, I know people who have been to LA." His uncle responds, "Have you ever been there yourself?" The protagonist admits he hasn't and his uncle replies "Exactly. They made it up."

The way I see it, there is always the slight probability that anything is true, no matter how small. One might as well stick to scientific beliefs, because that's the closest to the truth we'll ever get. Hell, think of it this way: the idea of an LCD screen would seem ludicrous and impossible to someone from 1492, or even 1892. The idea of magic seems impossible to us now. I predict that in 300 years we'll all be wizards. Our view of the world is dictated by our knowledge, and that knowledge is constantly changing.
 

Goremocker

Lost in Time
May 20, 2009
1,902
4
43
Our minds predict what we see...for all i know i could be sitting in the loony bin cutting myself screaming THE WORLD IS NOT AS I SEE!!! And thus created a fake reality,but that's just one option.
 

Tdc2182

New member
May 21, 2009
3,623
0
0
Ameatypie said:
This is the kind of stuff that goes through my head every day.

I have a theory. What if every time you go to sleep, the entire world changes along with your memory? You forget what you learned that day, and it is immediatley replaced with entirely new events.

For instance, Today my name is name would be something like Eric, but tommorrow I wake up and it is Steven. Everybody proceeds to call me Steven, and every memory I have of people using the name Eric is gone to be replaced with Steven.

Or, what if I wake up tommorow and look at this thread to find that I have posted a picture of breasts. And it turns out that all I do is go from site to site posting pictures of boobs. I have a complete memory of doing this and have no regrets at all, because I am a common troll
 

SilentVirus

New member
Jul 23, 2009
355
0
0
Can't confirm everything my friend, That would take too much time and who is to say someone else will doubt you? Just look at the moon landing, Some people says it happened others says it didn't. Just go with what "The Man" feeds us and live on.