Poll: Can England be invaded

Recommended Videos

keyton777

New member
Aug 14, 2008
380
0
0
Bulletinmybrain said:
Zombie Badger said:
Thanatos34 said:
Zombie Badger said:
The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia, and when the US attacked Canada in the War of 1812, they lost and the Canadians burned down the White House.
Err, I think you got your facts mixed up there. It was the British that burned down the White House in the War of 1812.
Thankyou for correcting me. Now I can tell Americans, 'My country kicked your arse!'
That is like saying you beat an infant at running.

The U.S was what? 200 years old? If that? You're what? Nearly a thousand year old country?

dude we hit 200 a few years ago
that was like when america was like 10
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
Yes

If the entire world came against anyone nation, they would crumble. Nobody has the power to fight off the combined power of the rest of the globe.
 

keyton777

New member
Aug 14, 2008
380
0
0
UltimatheChosen said:
Zombie Badger said:
The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia
They made the mistake of invading in summer. If you want to take over russia, you do it in spring... as early as possible. Because once winter rolls around, you've lost.
teh USA is rather hard to invade, look how far away we are from europe, and i doubt the souther americas would pose a big threat (not that they dont). and is almost as big as russia
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
keyton777 said:
UltimatheChosen said:
Zombie Badger said:
The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia
They made the mistake of invading in summer. If you want to take over russia, you do it in spring... as early as possible. Because once winter rolls around, you've lost.
teh USA is rather hard to invade, look how far away we are from europe, and i doubt the souther americas would pose a big threat (not that they dont). and is almost as big as russia
Any country would be hard to invade provided that they have a strong military force.

However Russia would most likely be the hardest due to them having decent military technology and large forces. Combine that with previously mentioned weather conditions, and it can make a for a long and tedious assault.
 

keyton777

New member
Aug 14, 2008
380
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
keyton777 said:
UltimatheChosen said:
Zombie Badger said:
The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia
They made the mistake of invading in summer. If you want to take over russia, you do it in spring... as early as possible. Because once winter rolls around, you've lost.
teh USA is rather hard to invade, look how far away we are from europe, and i doubt the souther americas would pose a big threat (not that they dont). and is almost as big as russia
Any country would be hard to invade provided that they have a strong military force.

However Russia would most likely be the hardest due to them having decent military technology and large forces. Combine that with previously mentioned weather conditions, and it can make a for a long and tedious assault.
same goes for the US
your going to fight 50 indvidual armies, knock your self out

(EDIT:semi individual, they dont all fight alone, still it would be hard as hell, and for very little gain)
 

CNKFan

New member
Aug 20, 2008
1,034
0
0
The vikings and the Romans invaded England the Nazis couldn't because they were fuck-tards and there really isn't any real strategic value of England anymore. Sorry to all of my English friends on the Escapist.
 

UltimatheChosen

New member
Mar 6, 2009
1,007
0
0
Zombie Badger said:
UltimatheChosen said:
Zombie Badger said:
UltimatheChosen said:
Zombie Badger said:
The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia
They made the mistake of invading in summer. If you want to take over russia, you do it in spring... as early as possible. Because once winter rolls around, you've lost.
There is no way that you could take over all 17,075,400 sq km of Russia in less than a year.
You don't have to. You just have to destroy the central government.
Then you have the problem of a resistance movement (An in a country that size, it will be impossible to destroy), probably leading to uprisings and a full scale revolution (They've dont it before). Also, given the mafia's current position in the country, you would likely be fighting them as well.
Once you get entrenched in Russia, you can just wait out the winter. The problem is launching assaults during in that godawful lethal cold. If you eliminate the government and take it over, then the resistance has to attack YOU. And once winter is over, you can go on the full offensive again.

Fighting the mafia... well, I'm not convinced that would be such a big problem. The primary fear that the mafia instills that they'll go after your family (from what I understand). It's pretty damn hard to kill a soldier's family when they're on another continent. The mafia isn't suited to open warfare.
 

xChevelle24

New member
Mar 10, 2009
730
0
0
Blitzkrieg8 said:
my bother thinks that England is invunrable to any attack even if the entire world formed a joint task to take down England. don't get in to why the world is invading England.

No Nukes!

[edit] could england defend it's self against each country one on one. Also new opinion in poll
Although there are 9+ pages, I will offer my full-thought into this.

England is an island (or maybe not, but I thought it was?), therefore it would be very hard for them to get supplies in and out. All that it's enemy would have to do would be to surround them, cut off their supplies and prepare for an amphibious assault while doing bombing raids, etc. etc.

Think of it as a modern invasion of Normandy, only we're attacking England. I think that it would be very possible for England to fall if invaded. World War II, again, is a prime example of this, because the world feared that as soon as Hitler had conquered France, he would conquer England. Now, if England was as invincible as you presume, we would have all sat back and ate popcorn and drank tea while we watched Hitler try to attack England and fail. The simple answer, it is very possible, and I don't see why it would be very hard, there are so many ways you could do it.
 

Zombie Badger

New member
Dec 4, 2007
784
0
0
UltimatheChosen said:
Zombie Badger said:
UltimatheChosen said:
Zombie Badger said:
UltimatheChosen said:
Zombie Badger said:
The only uninvadeable countries are Russia and Canada. Napoleon and Hitler got the shit kicked out of them trying to invade Russia
They made the mistake of invading in summer. If you want to take over russia, you do it in spring... as early as possible. Because once winter rolls around, you've lost.
There is no way that you could take over all 17,075,400 sq km of Russia in less than a year.
You don't have to. You just have to destroy the central government.
Then you have the problem of a resistance movement (An in a country that size, it will be impossible to destroy), probably leading to uprisings and a full scale revolution (They've dont it before). Also, given the mafia's current position in the country, you would likely be fighting them as well.
Once you get entrenched in Russia, you can just wait out the winter. The problem is launching assaults during in that godawful lethal cold. If you eliminate the government and take it over, then the resistance has to attack YOU. And once winter is over, you can go on the full offensive again.

Fighting the mafia... well, I'm not convinced that would be such a big problem. The primary fear that the mafia instills that they'll go after your family (from what I understand). It's pretty damn hard to kill a soldier's family when they're on another continent. The mafia isn't suited to open warfare.
You'd still have the problem the US faced in Vietnam, where you couldn't tell who was on your side. A civilian may walk up to you in the street and shoot you in the ribs, or blow himself and your squad up. Also, like any country, the locals know the terrain better than you, which is part of the reason why the US was defeated in Vietnam. As for the mafia, they may not be good at open warfare, but they are good at urban assassination. After a few months you'd probably have to replace your entire installed government (especially anyone who'd try to stop them) and they may take a leaf out of the Vietmihn's (The proper name for the Vietcong) book and set up a massive drugs trade selling to your soldiers, to make them too stoned to fight.
 

Nmil-ek

New member
Dec 16, 2008
2,597
0
0
BBQ Platypus said:
About the Battle of Britain:

The British, outnumbered as they were, still held pretty much every significant strategic advantage. They had a larger and more powerful navy. The German fighters lacked the range to cover the whole of the island (especially since they didn't have any aircraft carriers). The British had air defenses and a populace ready to fight for their country. The Germans didn't even have proper landing craft (and even if they did, the Royal Navy would have blown them out of the water).

That being said, none of those advantages would have meant shit if it weren't for those pilots. Britain could very well have sued for peace had she lost the air battle. However, with all those factors (including excellent pilots) in its favor, the Germans would have required the intervention of alien space bats to actually conquer Britain.


As for right now...I think the U.S. could do it (especially if the stealth fighters were sent in first). However, I don't think they could hold it for very long. I don't think any one nation could hold off an insurgency of 50 million pissed-off civilians. To conquer is easy - to rule is hard.
Pretty much, and if you think the British civilians would sit and accept a foreign rule they would be sorley dissapointed, not the murder capital of europe for nothing.
 

Agema

Overhead a rainbow appears... in black and white
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,917
7,080
118
This is a non-question. Invading England (although I presume the OP means Great Britain) could be accomplished by - at minimum - the USA and Russia tomorrow, if they had the forces in position.

All you'd need to invade Great Britain is air superiority, a decent fleet and sufficiently large army. Air superiority would prevent the Royal Navy from deploying, that would allow ground troops to land, and again air superiority would give a vast advantage when they got there.
 

BlueSharkBoy

New member
May 22, 2009
132
0
0
Chris B Chikin said:
Blitzkrieg8 said:
my bother thinks that England is invunrable to any attack even if the entire world formed a joint task to take down England. don't get in to why the world is invading England.

No Nukes!

[edit] could england defend it's self against each country one on one. Also new opinion in poll
Em, first up, why are we talking about England here? Shouldn't we be talking about Great Britain? You know, with those other two countries who share your island? Just please try to remember that England =/= Great Britain. It pisses people off no end when you make that mistake.

Anyway, no Britain is not invulnerable. The Romans conquered us in the past and then the Vikings and the William the Conqueror. An invasion of Britain wouldn't be impossible; just difficult. Personally, I would launch the invasion from Scandinavia and push South through Scotland. In the past everyone (Hitler, Napoleon, etc.) has tried to attack us from the south and they've failed miserably.
You know who the Romans couldn't invade? The Georgians. The country Georgia (country NOT state) is located south of Russia and North-East of Turkey. Great weather there.
 

Darathy

New member
May 28, 2009
29
0
0
I find it slightly bizarre that I'm posting in this thread at all, let alone sobre, but...

Wouldukindly said:
Not since 1066 A.D. it can't.
Not heard of the "Glorious Revolution" of 1688? Because if that wasn't an invasion, I'm Barbara Cartland. Unless, that is, William of Orange-Nassau was somehow magically English.

On-topic, we survived by the skin of our teeth last time, and we were much stronger and had far more allies and resources to pull on then. Even so, it was massively in our favour that Germany was fighting by that point on at least two fronts. The point is that any country can be invaded. There is nothing invulnerable about the UK, any more than there is anything invulnerable about Luxembourg.

But let's take a hypothetical invasion right now, and consider some salient points.

Consider, for example, that our foreign policy has been effectively totally spineless since the Suez Crisis.

Consider that we accepted the Marshall Plan, and are therefore tied to doing what America wants, regardless.

Consider that most of our armed forces are thousands of miles away.

Consider that after nearly seventy years of peace, the majority of the UK is slouched in front of the TV or the computer (yes, that includes you), and is effectively about as much use for repelling an invasion as a 30cm ruler.

Consider that we are drowning in debt.

Consider that our government is in its death throes, and our politics confounded.

Consider that our "nuclear deterrent" is twenty years out of date and far surpassed by those countries which have upgraded since then. And if you honestly think we'd launch... you need to watch more Yes, Prime Minister (link [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX_d_vMKswE]), and wake up and smell the delusion and tattered, long-dead glory.

Consider that our culture and our identity are stagnant and dying (and before anyone mentions anything foolish, I'd like to say I mean the likes of Tracy Emin and Stuckism).

And you honestly think we'd survive? We don't stand a snowball's chance in hell against France, let alone a major power such as the US.

Now, let's look at a different scenario, a UK in far better condition. Like that of, say, 1940. Oh, wait...

We're a fading has-been of a nation. The joke about Milwall and Liverpool fans earlier in the thread is telling in itself.