My take on this is that an opinion can't be 'wrong' as such. It can be unfounded, however.Woodsey said:This is something I often think about - especially when I'm on these forums - as it often results in debates becoming arguments. And I'm guessing that most people's gut reaction to the question will be, "no, of course they can't."
"Well that's just my opinion," seems to have become a get-out-of-jail-free-card for anyone from racists to the mythical beings that say they don't like Mafia (it's OK my friends, they're not real). In some cases that's a perfectly valid response when talking about an opinion on something subjective (a film/game/book, etc.) but in other instances that doesn't work.
If I said I hate Australia because they invaded China, then my opinion is wrong; that never happened (at least, I don't think it did...) and so my opinion is based on a false fact which in turn makes my opinion wrong.
So to me, an opinion can easily be wrong - of course, that's just my opinion.
Does anyone agree or disagree?
You're going for irony with this, yes? Tell me this is irony...Edzor said:My opinion is never wrong, because I tend to be heavily informed on any subject I write or talk about.
Unlike some idiots that just talk out of their ass and honestly think they know what they are talking about.
I replied, saying that opinions can't be wrong, only unfounded - and here you folks go and beat me to it, complete with in-depth discussion.Hurr Durr Derp said:That's more a matter of interpretation, but I'd say that if you're basing an opinion on flawed arguments, then that opinion is perfectly valid given the arguments you're using. It's the arguments themselves that are wrong.irishstormtrooper said:Yes, but if they are based on incorrect arguments, doesn't that make the opinion wrong as well?Hurr Durr Derp said:Opinions themselves cannot be wrong.
They can however be based on incorrect arguments, misunderstandings, false assumptions, prejudice, hearsay, etc.
Also, many people use opinions in a wrong way, either by disguising misconceptions as opinions or stating opinions as facts. Which, coincidentally, is what a lot of people are doing in this thread.
A simple example:
If I assume A=1 and B=2, then there's nothing wrong with saying A+B=3. If A was actually 3 and I made a mistake in assuming it was 1 then obviously A+B=3 is based on wrong information, but my train of thought is still correct in that 1+2 is indeed 3. The mistake at the beginning might invalidate my outcome, but it doesn't make the basic addition behind it wrong.
If I would say "I hate America because their president is Adolf Hitler" then my hate for America might still be very real, it's just based on nonsense.
No, no. See, that's exactly the kind of misuse I'm talking about. "Object X is Y miles away" is not an opinion. Physical distance is a measurable fact, not an opinion. If you say your house is six miles away when it's actually four miles away, you're not having a 'wrong opinion', you're just getting your facts wrong. Just because you're stupidly trying to present a misconception as an opinion doesn't make it an actual opinion.JEBWrench said:Sure they can. If someone holds a view that there is evidence that aliens exist, their opinion is wrong. If someone decides that an object in the distance must be X miles away, and it's not, that opinion is wrong.Hurr Durr Derp said:Opinions themselves cannot be wrong.
Nail head you hit the on.DTWolfwood said:nope. all opinions are correct to those that have them. whether they are fact or not is the question![]()
This. It all boils down to this.Wombaat said:In my opinion, any opinion that isn't my opinion is wrong.
Couldn't have said it better myself. So I won't. But I'm with HDD.Hurr Durr Derp said:That's more a matter of interpretation, but I'd say that if you're basing an opinion on flawed arguments, then that opinion is perfectly valid given the arguments you're using. It's the arguments themselves that are wrong.irishstormtrooper said:Yes, but if they are based on incorrect arguments, doesn't that make the opinion wrong as well?Hurr Durr Derp said:Opinions themselves cannot be wrong.
They can however be based on incorrect arguments, misunderstandings, false assumptions, prejudice, hearsay, etc.
Also, many people use opinions in a wrong way, either by disguising misconceptions as opinions or stating opinions as facts. Which, coincidentally, is what a lot of people are doing in this thread.
A simple example:
If I assume A=1 and B=2, then there's nothing wrong with saying A+B=3. If A was actually 3 and I made a mistake in assuming it was 1 then obviously A+B=3 is based on wrong information, but my train of thought is still correct in that 1+2 is indeed 3. The mistake at the beginning might invalidate my outcome, but it doesn't make the basic addition behind it wrong.
If I would say "I hate America because their president is Adolf Hitler" then my hate for America might still be very real, it's just based on nonsense.
No, no. See, that's exactly the kind of misuse I'm talking about. "Object X is Y miles away" is not an opinion. Physical distance is a measurable fact, not an opinion. If you say your house is six miles away when it's actually four miles away, you're not having a 'wrong opinion', you're just getting your facts wrong. Just because you're stupidly trying to present a misconception as an opinion doesn't make it an actual opinion.JEBWrench said:Sure they can. If someone holds a view that there is evidence that aliens exist, their opinion is wrong. If someone decides that an object in the distance must be X miles away, and it's not, that opinion is wrong.Hurr Durr Derp said:Opinions themselves cannot be wrong.
I think you're right in that "wrong" isn't the right word exactly; perhaps "invalid" would be better.Shinigami214 said:My take on this is that an opinion can't be 'wrong' as such. It can be unfounded, however.Woodsey said:This is something I often think about - especially when I'm on these forums - as it often results in debates becoming arguments. And I'm guessing that most people's gut reaction to the question will be, "no, of course they can't."
"Well that's just my opinion," seems to have become a get-out-of-jail-free-card for anyone from racists to the mythical beings that say they don't like Mafia (it's OK my friends, they're not real). In some cases that's a perfectly valid response when talking about an opinion on something subjective (a film/game/book, etc.) but in other instances that doesn't work.
If I said I hate Australia because they invaded China, then my opinion is wrong; that never happened (at least, I don't think it did...) and so my opinion is based on a false fact which in turn makes my opinion wrong.
So to me, an opinion can easily be wrong - of course, that's just my opinion.
Does anyone agree or disagree?
An unfounded opinion (i.e. an opinion based on either flawed reasoning or facts) is illogical, making it baseless as it is rooted in unstable 'thinking'.
Your opinion about hating Australia still can't be wrong. The reasons for your hatred may be wrong and you may need to reevaluate your hatred, but your opinion still can't be wrong. You can still hate Australia for no reason. You will however be viewed as bigoted but that is a different matter entirely.Woodsey said:If I said I hate Australia because they invaded China, then my opinion is wrong; that never happened (at least, I don't think it did...) and so my opinion is based on a false fact which in turn makes my opinion wrong.