Sorry, maybe I didn't write it clearly then; I know my opinion is the bit about Australia, my point was that the opinion is solely formed on a false fact. To me, that signals a wrong opinion. However, I'm starting to think that "invalid" is a more appropriate word to use than "wrong".Bigeyez said:Yeah sorry I edited in which part I was referring to there after you quoted me. (The invading China part). As for the second part of your post the trick here is identifying what is really an opinion and what isn't. To use your China example it IS your opinion that you hate Australia. The opinion may be based one the false pretense that Australia invaded China but that doesn't make the opinion "wrong" it just makes it an ill-informed opinion, and thus valued less then someone with a well-informed opinion. Later if you find out the truth and saw that Australia did not invade China you can change your opinion and be just as correct! Thats the beauty of opinions.Woodsey said:You'll have to be more direct about what part of what I've said you're referring to (the bit in bold) before I can reply properly.
Also, if you'll not (I appreciate I didn't write it down clearly), I talked about there being 2 different types of opinion. One that is purely subjective and one that is based around a fact.
What you say makes sense, but to me it doesn't quite ring true.