So apparently in New Zealnd they're cracking down on crazy names for babies.
Certainly I wouldn't call my kid it, but New Zealand is a secular nation right? So religion shouldn't play any part in this. It's largely different from say calling your kid "Adolf Hitler" whose deeds are real and horrific, as (not trying to start a religious debate but) to many in the world it would be basically a fictional name. Even to me and I'm a christian, but lucifer and the concept of the devil are very minimal in the bible itself.
As for being mocked? How is it worse than Francis or Reginald? No offense meant to the Franks and Reggies in the house. But I knew guys with those names who got mocked constantly. Now Lucifer Jones, that's a badass name, it says the kid rides bikes without a helmet and plays by nobody's rules.
Honestly if it comes to the choice between Lucifer and J'Dynne (Jaden), I want to ban the later (yeah I know Reductio ad absurdum).
What do you guys think? Should it be banned? Should any names be banned?
Source:
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/120757/new-zealand-bans-naming-children-lucifer/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/22/lucifer-banned-baby-name-new-zealand_n_906171.html
All of that kind of makes sense. But apparently "Lucifer" is also banned. Which I find odd. It's a "real" name and an old name, got a good meaning "Light-bringer", "Morning-star" and can be shorted to "Luc". It's also a name for Venus.The Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages seems to be trying to curb a lifetime of inevitable taunting for the children of parents who wanted to rather than give them names, give them punctuation symbols like:
. (Full Stop), * (Asterisk) and / (presumably "Slash")
In the past two years there have been 102 rejected names, including Baron, Bishop, Duke, General, Judge, Justice, King, Knight and Mr, all deemed too similar to titles. Messiah also got the thumbs down. The number 89, and the letters, C, D, I and T saw the same fate
Certainly I wouldn't call my kid it, but New Zealand is a secular nation right? So religion shouldn't play any part in this. It's largely different from say calling your kid "Adolf Hitler" whose deeds are real and horrific, as (not trying to start a religious debate but) to many in the world it would be basically a fictional name. Even to me and I'm a christian, but lucifer and the concept of the devil are very minimal in the bible itself.
As for being mocked? How is it worse than Francis or Reginald? No offense meant to the Franks and Reggies in the house. But I knew guys with those names who got mocked constantly. Now Lucifer Jones, that's a badass name, it says the kid rides bikes without a helmet and plays by nobody's rules.
Honestly if it comes to the choice between Lucifer and J'Dynne (Jaden), I want to ban the later (yeah I know Reductio ad absurdum).
What do you guys think? Should it be banned? Should any names be banned?
Source:
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/120757/new-zealand-bans-naming-children-lucifer/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/22/lucifer-banned-baby-name-new-zealand_n_906171.html