Poll: Death Penalty

Recommended Videos

mipegg

New member
Aug 26, 2008
111
0
0
No, but life in prison should mean your there until you die. Your possessions should be stripped from you and sold or used as council houses etc to help pay for the prison. Labor should also be mandatory.
 

DarkHyth

New member
Apr 10, 2008
63
0
0
I am for the death penalty, and believe it would be a good idea for us in the UK to have it. It would act as a big deterrent to would-be criminals. Some people who carry out horrific things just don't deserve to live.
 

Zykon TheLich

Extra Heretical!
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
3,506
850
118
Country
UK
Angron post=18.72690.769471 said:
BUT, i think it should only be in very serious cases where they are certain they did it.
Thats quite a difficult thing to put into precedent. Guilty or not guilty.
If they aren't certain they did it then they shouldn't be found guilty at all. Not, 'well, we reckon he's probably guilty, but we just not quite sure enough to have him killed in case we got it wrong'.
 

Limos

New member
Jun 15, 2008
789
0
0
I think the death penalty should be used in place of the Life sentence. Why strain the prison system with inmates who will never get out?

Really I think if your total sentence adds up to more than a lifetime they should just execute you immediately.

And really I don't see why it's needs to be especially humane. I think they should just put you in solitary confinement and fill your cell with carbon monoxide while you're sleeping. Better than strapping them to a table and putting a needle in their arm.
 

Death Magnetic

New member
Aug 10, 2008
506
0
0
In short, no.

In slightly longer, no because I reckon that prison is worse for a convict since they have to consemplate what they've done.

-Ricky
 

JakubK666

New member
Jan 1, 2008
781
0
0
I used to be very pro when I was young, but no just no.

The reason why they're banned in first place is because they've killed innocent people far to many times.

It also bring the philosophical point.We're all humans.Who gives one person the right to kill another killer? To quote Nietzsche:

He who fights monsters should take care not to become one
 

fedpayne

New member
Sep 4, 2008
904
0
0
No, of course not.

People who put yes if this and this, how can you judge? We can't, simple as that. I'm not saying God can, but there are ways we can make sure people can't go out and do more terrible things.

People who have unequivocal yesses, go watch the Green Mile.
 

Angron

New member
Jul 15, 2008
386
0
0
scumofsociety post=18.72690.769496 said:
Angron post=18.72690.769471 said:
BUT, i think it should only be in very serious cases where they are certain they did it.
Thats quite a difficult thing to put into precedent. Guilty or not guilty.
If they aren't certain they did it then they shouldn't be found guilty at all. Not, 'well, we reckon he's probably guilty, but we just not quite sure enough to have him killed in case we got it wrong'.
well they do get it wrong dont they...
i would hate to sentence someone to death to found out he was actually innocent :S
 

Zykon TheLich

Extra Heretical!
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
3,506
850
118
Country
UK
Angron post=18.72690.769540 said:
well they do get it wrong dont they...
i would hate to sentence someone to death to found out he was actually innocent :S
Exactly my point.
 

Hawgh

New member
Dec 24, 2007
910
0
0
If someone is mentally deranged to the degree that they will never be able to regret or repent their crimes(1), nor refrain from committing them again.
It becomes questionable whether forcing them to spend their crimes locked up in a cage, is the humane choice.

(1)Naturally, the crimes would have to be of a certain severity.
 

Anton P. Nym

New member
Sep 18, 2007
2,611
0
0
snowplow post=18.72690.769473 said:
Hmm, care to elaborate? Theoretically speaking, using prisoners as a labor force is an excellent idea. I can't think of reasons why it would fail. Do you have some specific info available on why exactly they didn't work out?
Some possible mechanisms;

- Prison labour isn't driven by the profit motive, and so can be provided at unprofitable rates. This depresses the labour market in the area, and the prices of any goods manufactured at a work camp.

- As a source of cheap labour, it becomes a political plum used to extract favours or support allies... leading to greater corruption.

- The labour provided by convicts isn't of the best quality, necessarily, which leads to a Gresham's Law problem of cruddy-but-cheap products driving out decent-but-expensive ones.

- Access to labour tools means more potential for improvised weaponry in prisons, which makes guarding prisoners more dangerous and therefor more expensive.

That's just what I can remember off the top of my head; I honestly don't know how much each contributes to the problem.

-- Steve
 

Beowulf DW

New member
Jul 12, 2008
656
0
0
I support life in prison over the death penalty. No matter how small the margin for error is, execution is not worth the risk of being wrong.

Besides, here in the U.S. it's actually less expensive to put some one in jail for the rest of their lives than it is to have them executed.

Add to that the fact that I'd want a murdering bastard to spent the rest of his/her life in chains like an animal, suffering everyday for the rest of their natural lives. Why would you want to put a serial murder out of his misery?
 

SecretTacoNinja

New member
Jul 8, 2008
2,256
0
0
Anton P. Nym post=18.72690.769404 said:
I would support the death sentence more if we didn't keep finding people on death row being exonerated later... it's kinda hard to make restitution for miscarriage of justice to a corpse.

There are some criminals whom I think are just too dangerous to keep alive; the serial killers and hardened gang leaders and multiple-repeat violent offenders, whose tolls over time show that there's no way they can coexist with others without inflicting horrors. But you can't just kill "the ones that need killin'" because that's not really a justice system anymore, it's lynching... so the lesser evil is to institute a real "life" sentence (akin to the Canadian "dangerous offender" status, so the guy ain't never leaving jail without divine intervention in triplicate) and hope for the best.

-- Steve
I would have said I wasn't sure, but Steve here pretty much wrapped up what I think.

Another alternative would be (say in the case of a rapist or killer or both) to make them experience the pain and fear that their victim(s) felt and let them live in jail for the rest of their lives knowing how their victim(s) felt, buuut since we don't have the technology to simulate it and I don't approve of torturing killers (except in a few cases such as the moors murderers) I don't see it happening.
 

Anarchemitis

New member
Dec 23, 2007
9,102
0
0
Being strongly Christian and knowing that it is not our worldly place to judge, Capital Punishment is a travesty of human endeavor in the name of "justice".
 

ThePlasmatizer

New member
Sep 2, 2008
1,261
0
0
TheNecroswanson post=18.72690.769599 said:
Because there is no misery in prison. They're not in chains the rest of their lives. They actually live quite comfortably, with nice rooms, warm beds, three square meals a day, and free cable, on your dime.
So that justifies killing them?

I agree punishment today is too lenient, there needs to be longer prison sentences with more emphasis on prison being a punishment, but still a focus on rehabilition, at the moment prison fails at both of these points.
 

Beowulf DW

New member
Jul 12, 2008
656
0
0
TheNecroswanson post=18.72690.769599 said:
Because there is no misery in prison. They're not in chains the rest of their lives. They actually live quite comfortably, with nice rooms, warm beds, three square meals a day, and free cable, on your dime.
Have you ever seen the series on prison life a few years back? In maximum security prisons, it's a living hell.

How can you honestly believe that there's no misery in prison? Do you think that convicts get up every morning with a bright smile on their collective faces?
 

Clairaudient

New member
Aug 12, 2008
614
0
0
"You thought we could be decent men in an indecent time. But you were wrong. The world is cruel, and the only morality in a cruel world is chance. Unbiased. Unprejudiced. Fair."
 

Zykon TheLich

Extra Heretical!
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
3,506
850
118
Country
UK
TheNecroswanson post=18.72690.769599 said:
Because there is no misery in prison. They're not in chains the rest of their lives. They actually live quite comfortably, with nice rooms, warm beds, three square meals a day, and free cable, on your dime.
Go back to victorian prisons.

Wake up at 5 am, out into the work room and start turning the wheel. Continue until bedtime. What does this wheel do? Nothing. It just turns. It serves no useful purpose other than to piss you off.

Or shoveling rocks. Take the rock pile from one side of the yard to the other. Then back again. Ad infinitum.