Thats quite a difficult thing to put into precedent. Guilty or not guilty.Angron post=18.72690.769471 said:BUT, i think it should only be in very serious cases where they are certain they did it.
He who fights monsters should take care not to become one
well they do get it wrong dont they...scumofsociety post=18.72690.769496 said:Thats quite a difficult thing to put into precedent. Guilty or not guilty.Angron post=18.72690.769471 said:BUT, i think it should only be in very serious cases where they are certain they did it.
If they aren't certain they did it then they shouldn't be found guilty at all. Not, 'well, we reckon he's probably guilty, but we just not quite sure enough to have him killed in case we got it wrong'.
Exactly my point.Angron post=18.72690.769540 said:well they do get it wrong dont they...
i would hate to sentence someone to death to found out he was actually innocent :S
Some possible mechanisms;snowplow post=18.72690.769473 said:Hmm, care to elaborate? Theoretically speaking, using prisoners as a labor force is an excellent idea. I can't think of reasons why it would fail. Do you have some specific info available on why exactly they didn't work out?
I would have said I wasn't sure, but Steve here pretty much wrapped up what I think.Anton P. Nym post=18.72690.769404 said:I would support the death sentence more if we didn't keep finding people on death row being exonerated later... it's kinda hard to make restitution for miscarriage of justice to a corpse.
There are some criminals whom I think are just too dangerous to keep alive; the serial killers and hardened gang leaders and multiple-repeat violent offenders, whose tolls over time show that there's no way they can coexist with others without inflicting horrors. But you can't just kill "the ones that need killin'" because that's not really a justice system anymore, it's lynching... so the lesser evil is to institute a real "life" sentence (akin to the Canadian "dangerous offender" status, so the guy ain't never leaving jail without divine intervention in triplicate) and hope for the best.
-- Steve
So that justifies killing them?TheNecroswanson post=18.72690.769599 said:Because there is no misery in prison. They're not in chains the rest of their lives. They actually live quite comfortably, with nice rooms, warm beds, three square meals a day, and free cable, on your dime.
Have you ever seen the series on prison life a few years back? In maximum security prisons, it's a living hell.TheNecroswanson post=18.72690.769599 said:Because there is no misery in prison. They're not in chains the rest of their lives. They actually live quite comfortably, with nice rooms, warm beds, three square meals a day, and free cable, on your dime.
Go back to victorian prisons.TheNecroswanson post=18.72690.769599 said:Because there is no misery in prison. They're not in chains the rest of their lives. They actually live quite comfortably, with nice rooms, warm beds, three square meals a day, and free cable, on your dime.