No you see... I knew Tom & Jerry were created by those two artists since I was a child. Everyone in my country did at my age (my country is Italy, by the way). So it kind of baffles me that so many people didn't know it in the USA. Well, perhaps i'm just being naive.Jadak said:And as a film critic, that's fine. But in regards to your first post of the thread, you may want to adjust your expectations of what has any significance to the common person who aren't involved in a field that directly rates to such knowledge.Madhog said:Well, I'm a film critic with an immense love for animation (both western and Japanese, mind you), so for me it's kind of a big deal.Jadak said:Plenty familiar with Tom and Jerry as part of my childhood, but certainly didn't have the slightest idea who was involved with the creation of any iteration of it, and honestly couldn't care less, as is the case with most shows.
William Hanna.Terminate421 said:Fred Hannah and joseph barbera
The older Tom and Jerry is a classic, anything past sucks.
that's part of why people regard it highly, it goes back to a more fearless time in animation, or at least, a more irreverent time (although personally I don't think it's all that much)Daystar Clarion said:They don't make 'em like that anymore.The_root_of_all_evil said:I was far more appalled when they gave them voices.
And then when they removed Tom's cigars.
I've said it before: NO modern (1960-) cartoon can contend to this:
Looney Tunes, Tom & Jerry, these guys were doing what MLP is lauded for freakin' decades ago.
Why would 40 year olds care? they were born 30 years too late too y'know. Tom and Jerry was at its best in the 40's and 50's.Ordinaryundone said:A better question would be "Does anyone under the age of 40 give a crap about Tom and Jerry?"
Seriously, those cartoons were old before most of the people on this site were even born.
I would say that you are, such knowledge isn't even the sort of thing that's even come close to the sort of knowledge I'd have become aware of at any point, let alone be common. For me (age 23, fyi), Tom and Jerry has absolutely no more significance than any other animated series I had growing up, be it any Looney Toons show, Batman, whatever. I couldn't even begin to guess who made those, and Tom and Jerry is no different. Just another cartoon that one would watch because it happened to be on, and the interest and involvement stopped there. Pretty much no cultural integration beyond that.Madhog said:No you see... I knew Tom & Jerry were created by those two artists since I was a child. Everyone in my country did at my age (my country is Italy, by the way). So it kind of baffles me that so many people didn't know it in the USA. Well, perhaps i'm just being naive.
And that's why I love it even more. Psychopath toons are the best.Fooz said:I always thought it was Fred Quimby as that was the name I always saw before the episode, but obviously I am wrong
But what I do know is that I used to fucking love that show when I was younger, when I watch it now though, I just feel sorry for Tom and realised how much of a psychopathic asshole Jerry is
Hanna-Barbara sort of has two different identities--they made many animated TV cartoons in the 40s and 50s the conventional way, but then in the 60s they started using the cheap/quick method we know them for today. Moviebob did a Big Picture on this method, [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/the-big-picture/3854-The-Collar] actually. They basically invented the "flash" method of animating characters in parts rather than redrawing the entire character for every frame. Except back in the 60s they did it with pencils, not Flash ;-) It is obviously and notoriously a much cheaper and, quite frankly, uglier way to animate, but you can't deny the success of their franchises. And there's really no way they could have cranked out the shows like they did had it not been for that method.gigastrike said:Tom and Jerry was made by Hanna-Barbara? The people who made Scooby-Doo and Jabber-Jaw? I always thought it was made by Warner Bros.
That's the kind of guts-wrecking rage I feel whenever I think of the 1994 "Tom & Jerry" movie... as a child, that was the very first animated movie that pissed me off to no end. Good times.Robert Ewing said:The period directly after Chuck Jones took over was the END of the good Tom and Jerry shows. Even Chuck Jones was pushing it, with his new take on the characters, and his daring new, very art deco style, yet it was notably worse than the previous series. Tom and Jerry pre 60's was probably up there among the best cartoons ever made, it was timelessly funny, magnificently written, lovingly simple, charming, wonderfully and shamelessly violent, and had brilliant music.
I remember watching the modern Tom and Jerry shows, must of came out some time in the 00's. It was complete utter shit, even the children watching it knew how shit it was. I was disgusted with everything in it. The fucking voices, why have voices!? The animation techniques, why change it!? The music, don't even get me started... The new characters? What the fuck are you trying to do!? And each episode had a plot with a moral at the end, telling you to be good, share, don't be violent, make friends, not enemies... fuck that... If you want to preach about that sort of thing, don't use Tom and Jerry as a bloody vessel! They don't need it! There is no equal to the magnificence of the old Tom and Jerry.
Sadly, because of political correctness, and the 'protecting our youth whether we like it or not and if you don't comply we will call you racist, sexist and a freedom hating hippie act', no show will rise to take up Tom and Jerry's mantle... I can say that with complete honesty...
Yes, yes they are.Fijiman said:I had never actually known who the original creators were (although I had a hunch that it would be Hanna-Barbera), so this was quite informative. Hell, all I've really known about Tom & Jerry is that they've been around for years, the older shows are awesome, and most of the newer stuff is crap. Most of the movies that have been made within the last six or seven years or so are really bad in my opinion.
As someone studying animation, you just blew my mind. Holy crap that was awesome. I weep for the cartoons of today, I can only cringe that thought of what something pitched like that would look like today made in Flash. It wouldn't have near as much life in the movement. And they'd never get away with something like snapping at fingers with scissors.The_root_of_all_evil said:I was far more appalled when they gave them voices.
And then when they removed Tom's cigars.
I've said it before: NO modern (1960-) cartoon can contend to this:
Is that why it had 2 correct answers? To be honest if the poll isn't adding any value, then why add it at all?Madhog said:Also, the presence of a poll was meant as ironic.
Makes me glad I got the Looney Tunes Golden Collection Box set for Christmas.Daystar Clarion said:They don't make 'em like that anymore.The_root_of_all_evil said:I was far more appalled when they gave them voices.
And then when they removed Tom's cigars.
I've said it before: NO modern (1960-) cartoon can contend to this:
Looney Tunes, Tom & Jerry, these guys were doing what MLP is lauded for freakin' decades ago.
Yeah, this comes from the days where the layers were hand drawn, I think.Sporky111 said:As someone studying animation, you just blew my mind. Holy crap that was awesome. I weep for the cartoons of today, I can only cringe that thought of what something pitched like that would look like today made in Flash. It wouldn't have near as much life in the movement. And they'd never get away with something like snapping at fingers with scissors.The_root_of_all_evil said:I was far more appalled when they gave them voices.
And then when they removed Tom's cigars.
I've said it before: NO modern (1960-) cartoon can contend to this: