There's an absence of a "no" option.
Look, one of the few religious figures we know is real is Mohammad.
Jesus is dubious. There is NO proof he existed. The timeline of his life is problematic. For the most important man on Earth, all the information about him is rather sketchy. It's not a "no duh". What solid evidence is there to back up his existence? There is none. All "records" of him came decades after the fact. See the problem with that? I don't think he was a real person; just as real as Zeus or Loki.
Look, one of the few religious figures we know is real is Mohammad.
Jesus is dubious. There is NO proof he existed. The timeline of his life is problematic. For the most important man on Earth, all the information about him is rather sketchy. It's not a "no duh". What solid evidence is there to back up his existence? There is none. All "records" of him came decades after the fact. See the problem with that? I don't think he was a real person; just as real as Zeus or Loki.