Yes, I believe we landed there because I have an IQ over 20.....
Still I think all these conspiracy nuts are all making a ruckus over nothing.
Still I think all these conspiracy nuts are all making a ruckus over nothing.
Poll: Do you believe we landed on the moon?
- Thread starter Calatar
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I think I'm going to go with the Buzz Aldrin argument and punch any ridiculous bastard who thinks we faked them in the face.
Someone actually asked me why,if we already landed on the moon,we didn't go back recently.
I made him think about what he said very carefully by pointing out the uselessness of actually BEING of the moon and the gargantuous cost of building over there and resupplying it.
Needless to say that was the last time we debated about that subject.
Someone actually asked me why,if we already landed on the moon,we didn't go back recently.
I made him think about what he said very carefully by pointing out the uselessness of actually BEING of the moon and the gargantuous cost of building over there and resupplying it.
Needless to say that was the last time we debated about that subject.
The fact that the Russians themselves admitted that the US did, in fact, land on the Moon before they did supersedes any and all conspiracy theories that people might have about the "issue".
Oh, and the reams and reams of scientific data and evidence and whatnot.
However, as Winston Churchill is a carrot, refraction of light through water is the government adding scary chemicals into the supply, and the world's going to end in 2012, what do I know?
Oh, and the reams and reams of scientific data and evidence and whatnot.
However, as Winston Churchill is a carrot, refraction of light through water is the government adding scary chemicals into the supply, and the world's going to end in 2012, what do I know?
I have no idea. We've been there once, that's for certain, but I've been told that the second trip there was an obvious fake because the flag was waving. I would have to watch the videos of the expeditions to find out for sure but I'm waaaay too lazy and uninterested to do that. I, like many other people, just don't give a rat's ass about our planet's moon; and I'm only slightly more interested about water on Mars. In fact, I really won't get interested in space unless (until?) the Earth can no longer sustain human life and we as a species have to be evacuated and move to space stations or another planet or something.
/thread. I'm sorry, this was what, the 6th post in? And people are still talking after this post? Gah... -_*'Puzzles said:
I think more modern statistics place the figure closer to a third of Americans but don't quote me on that.Calatar said:
Anyway, I can see why people think it might be a hoax for the same reason people can believe in creationism. On the surface it can sound good but if you scratch beneath that you see it's bullshit. For example one of the things the conspiracy theorists like to point out is that the Van Allen radiation belt around the earth will kill you. That's true, but you'd have to stay there for a while for it to do any harm to a human and it can also be shielded against.
It's also becoming harder and harder to deny it, with some recent photos of the remainder of the Apollo landing crafts on the moon being released. Though if you wanted to you could just assume they were faked too.
yea it would have to be i dont think the goverment would spend millons trying to fake it. also not only is it a waste of money its a waste of time then they would have to keep the people from the clip quite "how would you do this" money an even bigger waste of money so i think it was real
im sorry but whenever there is a story about a ufo there are far too many holes like if aliens could travel far and anywhere and storys talk about abduction if the do get abducted why is there no evidence when they get back except their word but enough about aleins back to the MOONAnoctris said:
There's another definite proof that the moon-landings weren't fake. That proof lies in history. The only ones just as obsessed as the Americans when it came to watching the moon-landing directly was the other super-power at that time: The Soviet Union. To those of you who don't know, this is why it was called a space-race: it was a show-off of power between the USA and the Soviet Union. You can imagine what would've happened if the Soviet Union thought there wasn't a crew on-board the ship the Americans sent.
I've heard different arguments from Conspiracy Theorists, none of them have made sense to me.
As to the flag which everyone are complaining about. You don't need atmosphere to make a flag move by itself. It is enough that you move the bloody thing and the material-part of the flag will lag behind as it isn't a solid object.
I've heard different arguments from Conspiracy Theorists, none of them have made sense to me.
As to the flag which everyone are complaining about. You don't need atmosphere to make a flag move by itself. It is enough that you move the bloody thing and the material-part of the flag will lag behind as it isn't a solid object.
I believe that the USA put a man on the moon. Even if I wasn't alive to experience it.
Also, this should prove amusing to other forum-goers on this topic:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOo6aHSY8hU
Also, this should prove amusing to other forum-goers on this topic:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOo6aHSY8hU
Yes I belive that the american spaceprogram sucsefully placed people on the moon during the cold war. I am suprised on how some pwople react towards the conspiracy-theorists, proclaiming that they are stupid and crazy and such. The conspiracytheory developed during the cold war on rational acusations. The USA had motivation for lying about it if it was a lie. And some things are a little 'off' on the moonlanding-video. these turned out to be propagandaedited adjustments after the actuall landing, but the landing was real.
