You didn't learn to drive a manual car during driving lessons?Tiger Sora said:Automatic. Simply because at the time the one car we had that was manuel was off limits. No driving zeh expensive car for me. So I never learned.
...until it breaks. CVTs are horrendously fragile, and normal automatic transmissions are easier to break than they should be. There's a damn good reason big trucks still use manual shifters for both gearboxes and differentials. They need them to last more than a couple hundred thousand miles.The Lugz said:I'm an engineer, i find any device that needs constant attention such as gear changing to be a lazy design
the reason you change gear is due to the combustion engine having a limited power band
that's fine, but forcing the driver to fix the problem just feels like a workaround to me
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variomatic
that will explain the issue, it's simply a matter of engineering it is possible to have an infinitely adjustable gear system that is in the best ratio all the time
I will use automatics when those systems become commonplace in every car because they are better than you, no-matter how hard you try
You'd be amazed at how simple, non-technical and all-around useless driving lessons are in North America.Numachuka said:You didn't learn to drive a manual car during driving lessons?Tiger Sora said:Automatic. Simply because at the time the one car we had that was manuel was off limits. No driving zeh expensive car for me. So I never learned.
i agree, for now manual but when the technology is fixed automatics will be superior and then i'll use themloc978 said:...until it breaks. CVTs are horrendously fragile, and normal automatic transmissions are easier to break than they should be. There's a damn good reason big trucks still use manual shifters for both gearboxes and differentials. They need them to last more than a couple hundred thousand miles.The Lugz said:I'm an engineer, i find any device that needs constant attention such as gear changing to be a lazy design
the reason you change gear is due to the combustion engine having a limited power band
that's fine, but forcing the driver to fix the problem just feels like a workaround to me
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variomatic
that will explain the issue, it's simply a matter of engineering it is possible to have an infinitely adjustable gear system that is in the best ratio all the time
I will use automatics when those systems become commonplace in every car because they are better than you, no-matter how hard you try
As a technician, I prefer manual.
Don't count on it with internal combustion engines. Electrics are pretty much the wave of the future, be they powered by hydrogen or batteries... and a well-designed electric doesn't need variable gears at all. A 1:1 where more RPMs=more speed is more than sufficient in most cases.The Lugz said:i agree, for now manual but when the technology is fixed automatics will be superior and then i'll use themloc978 said:...until it breaks. CVTs are horrendously fragile, and normal automatic transmissions are easier to break than they should be. There's a damn good reason big trucks still use manual shifters for both gearboxes and differentials. They need them to last more than a couple hundred thousand miles.The Lugz said:I'm an engineer, i find any device that needs constant attention such as gear changing to be a lazy design
the reason you change gear is due to the combustion engine having a limited power band
that's fine, but forcing the driver to fix the problem just feels like a workaround to me
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variomatic
that will explain the issue, it's simply a matter of engineering it is possible to have an infinitely adjustable gear system that is in the best ratio all the time
I will use automatics when those systems become commonplace in every car because they are better than you, no-matter how hard you try
As a technician, I prefer manual.