When I got spanked when I was younger... 9/10 times I deserved it. A lot of kids need it, just to instill some discipline.
for the most part you are right, but you are wrong in this little bitMarter said:you'll instil good values in them, and they won't misbehave because they know it's wrong.
If you did that, then why would you need to spank them?Madara XIII said:No, Spanking isn't wrong if done properly. The best way to do it is explain to them WHY they are getting spanked and what they did wrong then spank them.
Society's definition of child abuse is blown completely out of proportion and I don't advocate the real meaning of abuse. Secondly for some kids it works, but as Edward Thorndike proved before, negative reinforcers prevent the repetition of an unapproved action. Secondly you say that as if a parent savagely beats their kid and scars them mentally forever just because they got spanked on the butt.DanielDeFig said:If you did that, then why would you need to spank them?Madara XIII said:No, Spanking isn't wrong if done properly. The best way to do it is explain to them WHY they are getting spanked and what they did wrong then spank them.
No. Spanking, Smacking, or hitting a child in any form is child abuse. It is a physical and mental abuse of a person who is underage and unable and unwilling to defend themselves against figures of authority (especially true if done by parents, who then tell the child they love them).
Child abuse is wrong, and a violation of human rights. It is therefore illegal in most developed countries.
don't hit your kids, talk to them. And kids who are being hurt, contact higher authorities (Civil service, Police). And yes, you are still a kid if your'e 15. If hitting an adult is Assault (illegal, and you can be sent to jail for it), then under what logic would it be different for kids?
Finally a guy here that knows it right! WOOT!imnotparanoid said:Here here!Digikid said:No it is not wrong. Today's kids are selfish and spoiled and just overall idiotic. They were never taught the value or morals or anything and they were let away with it.
Spanking should still be allowed and in my family it IS allowed. When I have children and they misbehave I too will swat them if it is deserved.
If they would just behave than they wouldnt get hit!
I'm all for smacking, but I know plenty of people who have never had to smack at all.Zeeky_Santos said:well it depends if the child responds emotionally to harsh words and shouting, most do, but not the the degree of 'it won't happen again' as a spanking.MelziGurl said:Not always the case and an annoying assumption. Just because some people choose not to smack, does not mean they are spoiling their child. Verbal punishments can work just as well as physical depending on the child and how they react.Home-Skillet said:I don't see how anyone could raise a kid properly without spanking them.
Unless you're the type that spoils them into annoying brats.
Once again, all for smacking but verbal works just as well in just as many cases. I copped both ends of the scale and both are as scary as each other if not used in the right manner. Either one can be abused.Madara XIII said:*Sigh* don't start with verbal punishmentMelziGurl said:Not always the case and an annoying assumption. Just because some people choose not to smack, does not mean they are spoiling their child. Verbal punishments can work just as well as physical depending on the child and how they react.Home-Skillet said:I don't see how anyone could raise a kid properly without spanking them.
Unless you're the type that spoils them into annoying brats.
That SHIT scars you a hell of alot more than anything, mainly because it's your parents telling you stuff like that. Now that's not to say I'm against lecturing