Poll: Do you think that women being topless in public should be allowed and accepted?

[ShawnRiles]

No, because then half of the internet's bewb industry will be ruined. C'mon, are you willing to sacrifice a whole internet industry based around bewbs just to watch usually unattractive women flaunt their jigglies in public?

...There's an ACTUAL bewb industry?

DO THEY HAVE TOURS?!

 

[Brainbomb]

Um, because the reason men would want women topless in public is because they like to oggle the female body. They don't actually give a shit about being "equal". It's about them getting a free show. Duh.

Also, I have no desire to see another woman's breasts.

1. In regard to the first bit. Duh. There will likely always be that element, but should that stop social progress? (I'm being serious here)

2. That second bit matters as much as a man okaying this just for the sake of oggling some funbags.

 

[RatRace123]

It's a horrible double standard, if a guy wants to go shirtless it's usually more accepted. But if a women wants to display her perfect, ripe, round, lucious..... uh, whu?

Yeah, I'm for it.

 

[LewsTherin]

I say meh. I really couldn't care... except I'd probably snap my neck with a double take. That would be bad. And bloody awkward, but that's just me.

 

[Radelaide]

my response to this is "Yeah women should have to wear shirts." because there are certain rules for every situation. Girls can hit guys, but you're a super-dick if you hit a girl. Are double standards fair? No. Should we get rid of them all at once? No. Let's start with the little things and we'll work our way up.

If a guy hits on me, I don't think he's a jerk. I think he's got the guts to ask a girl out. I politely tell him that I've got a boyfriend and be on my merry.

Double standards are always going to exist. Boobs are for certain occasions. Sorry lads.

He was talking about physical hitting, like a punch.

Did I just have a blonde moment on the internet?

God damn it...

 

[Disaster Button]

What I don't understand is why men can be shown topless in nothing but pants, but women can't. It just boggles me, consider me boggled.

Because breasts are considered a much more erotic body part than men's chests by most people.

Which is weird when you think about it they're in the same place and aren't massively different. You'd also think this would be argued about in the interest of equality by feminisis and the like.

 

[Urgh76]

If only in the appropriate situations then yes

 

[Deleted]

I think women need a licences to go topless once the whole topless thing is passed. Nobody wants a fat person flaunting their stuff. /sarcasm

 

[Normalgamer]

my response to this is "Yeah women should have to wear shirts." because there are certain rules for every situation. Girls can hit guys, but you're a super-dick if you hit a girl. Are double standards fair? No. Should we get rid of them all at once? No. Let's start with the little things and we'll work our way up.

If a guy hits on me, I don't think he's a jerk. I think he's got the guts to ask a girl out. I politely tell him that I've got a boyfriend and be on my merry.

Double standards are always going to exist. Boobs are for certain occasions. Sorry lads.

He was talking about physical hitting, like a punch.

Did I just have a blonde moment on the internet?

God damn it...

Lol, I actually thought the exact same thing when I read the post and I was like "Wait what?" took me mah 3rd try anyway :/.
TL;DR Your not alone .

 

[ReincarnatedFTP]

I think women need a licences to go topless once the whole topless thing is passed. Nobody wants a fat person flaunting their stuff. /sarcasm

Even if you were serious, there'd be that one indifferent bureaucrat who'd let the fat woman have the license for the lulz.

 

[PacRatFilms]

Yes, definitely. I don't see why society has considered a topless woman offensive, but a topless man perfectly normal. It's discrimination.

 

[Deleted]

I think women need a licences to go topless once the whole topless thing is passed. Nobody wants a fat person flaunting their stuff. /sarcasm

Even if you were serious, there'd be that one indifferent bureaucrat who'd let the fat woman have the license for the lulz.

Eh take the good with the bad. If other countries adopt this new thing the first would be Japan. Which is also where I'll move the day after the bill is passed.

 

[Sightless Wisdom]

I'm honestly not sure if it is legal...either way it's fine with me. It's oddly pointless but whatever.

 

[MiracleOfSound]

What I don't understand is why men can be shown topless in nothing but pants, but women can't. It just boggles me, consider me boggled.

Because breasts are considered a much more erotic body part than men's chests by most people.

Which is weird when you think about it they're in the same place and aren't massively different. You'd also think this would be argued about in the interest of equality by feminisis and the like.

I guess it's just the way we've evolved, or maybe because boners are more difficult to hide than excited vaginas so it would be mighty embarrassing walking around town seeing boobs everywhere and having to bend forward as you walk...

 

[recoverytwo]

Why not ?

Altho i have a feeling if i see them every where it wouldn't be as awesome.

 

[Mushroomfreak111]

Just admit it guys, you'd be feeling damn uncomfortable with it I'm sure...

Actually, if you were raised in a society where women showed just as much skin as men, would breasts truly be treated as sexual objects? I thought the whole point about the attraction of bewbs was the fact that you can't just pop down your highstreet and see some with the snap of a finger.

...well. Unless you're willing to pay for a prostitute.

Very true, but the code word is IF^^. We weren't, so most would feel uncomfortable with it. Tho if everyone did go around topless every day do you have any idea how saggy our tits would be? I for one need the support...

 

[Assassin Xaero]

But if the women are fine with that, then sure

They would have to be considering it would be optional. If they weren't fine with it, then they could wear clothes.

OT: I don't really care much, but would prefer if they didn't. If it was legal, then ehh... then power to them, but then I know there would always be bitches who would go ape shit if people stared at them, even though they knew they would. And for all you pervs out there that like the idea, well, you know all those unattractive women that think they are the best looking things ever, or old/fat women who don't care, well, it applies to them too.

 

[era81]

Why,yes I do.

 

[StonkThis]

It shouldn't be a big deal. The only difference between man and women there is that one produces milk and is larger (sometimes). If we're talking visually, does that mean fat men with man boobs can't be topless... But it probably would end with a lot of random touching on the streets seeing as boobs have been put on a pedestal. Maybe it's because I'm a male teen, but I think it should be legal. I'm pretty sure it is in some of Canada already (although I don't see any of it -.-).

 

[brass munkey]

I'm sorry all i got is something about women and tits.

No, but seriously I think it should be a matter of choice for women to go topless.