First a note here. Something tells me you're not a Latin geek, so I'll just clarify it. Medium is singular form, Media is plural.wootsman said:I just found out media and genre mean the same thing and we have been using them wrong the whole time. Well anyways what I'm trying to nothing about japanese animation that forces it too do those kinda of stories in fact those are only a small part everything out though i have notice thats all adult swim airs. As for the second part while some mediums rely on real life people to play characters, Though in mediums such as animation, comics, and video games that only need voices for characters or just to draw them, characters tend to be exaggerated.Kargathia said:I'm not entirely sure whether in your opinion anime is a medium, or a genre. The last time I checked it wasn't the sole user of illustrated books and animation, so I'm going to go with it being a genre.wootsman said:media =/= genre and honestly almost every media does that.Kargathia said:Somehow I never found myself able to appreciate something that deals in excessively emotional responses and thinly concealed sexual repression.
You're pretty right in that other genres also show some of the same characteristics. Anything involving angsty teenagers is a sure hit on the excessive emotional response thingie. It's not really a coincidence either I'm no fan of twilight and sitcoms.
I'm not entirely sure though what other genre displays the same excessive amounts of repressed sexuality as anime. Mostly it's just the good ol' oversexed approach, which features just as many DD cup sizes, but far fewer schoolgirls wielding said cups.
AHH HIPSTER KILL HIM! KILL HIM WITH FIRE AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA! *ahem* I mean yeah I get you. I really don't like either of those terms either even though I honestly just looked them up 5 minutes ago if someone called me that I'd kinda be pissed off. It's not like I don't do other things and even though I like Japanese culture I'm far from being in love with it and obsessing over it.Tesral said:Manga series are too darned expensive for me, Doujin FTW. As for anime, i never get time to watch any long series so I usually just pass them up.
(Now to try and say this without sounding like a hipster) I always try to avoid anything too mainstream, or anything too simple. I prefer something classy, and avoid the 'Otaku' or 'Weeaboo' tags like the plauge.
You're not familiar of Sturgeon's Law, are you?darkless said:Sure I'm not a hard core fan but there are some anime and manga out there I like, a LOT of it is just fan service and crap though.
This, I have a collection of about 500 manga and watch a few animes (I feel that they often aren't great, with a few notable exceptions) but I wouldn't call myself an otaku.Uszi said:Heh, polls a bit misleading. I would never consider myself Otaku [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otaku].
Agreed. Point closed.wootsman said:I meant how scifi is a genre to the medium movies tv books etc.According to my dictionary the distinction between a medium and a genre is that a medium is solely the method of delivery, and a genre also includes things as style. BBC News, and your local top40 station both share the medium of radio, but they're pretty different genres of broadcasting.
Both characters transforming in a childlike version of themselves when they're throwing a mini-tantrum, and the addition of characters with no obvious value except them being fluffy and cute is pretty widespread I'd say. At least: I found it hard to find any anime not guilty of this.Its getting hard to tell what you watchedBut too much is too much, and literal childlike tantrums and "isn't he cuuuuuuutttttteeeee?!
They don't have to be talking the entire time. My point is that you can establish a character purely on what they say, without any kind of exaggeration.some serious shows do ,do this though one might argue why are you going to waste so much time and money if the characters are just talkingCharacters never have to be exaggerated, as they can be established by nothing more than dialogue. Books have been doing this for quite a while, so I fail to see why animation can't.
Yea, that'd be it.wootsman said:Are you talking about when a character makes a weird noise like EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHKargathia said:Agreed. Point closed.wootsman said:I meant how scifi is a genre to the medium movies tv books etc.According to my dictionary the distinction between a medium and a genre is that a medium is solely the method of delivery, and a genre also includes things as style. BBC News, and your local top40 station both share the medium of radio, but they're pretty different genres of broadcasting.
Both characters transforming in a childlike version of themselves when they're throwing a mini-tantrum, and the addition of characters with no obvious value except them being fluffy and cute is pretty widespread I'd say. At least: I found it hard to find any anime not guilty of this.Its getting hard to tell what you watchedBut too much is too much, and literal childlike tantrums and "isn't he cuuuuuuutttttteeeee?!
They don't have to be talking the entire time. My point is that you can establish a character purely on what they say, without any kind of exaggeration.some serious shows do ,do this though one might argue why are you going to waste so much time and money if the characters are just talkingCharacters never have to be exaggerated, as they can be established by nothing more than dialogue. Books have been doing this for quite a while, so I fail to see why animation can't.
or something like this
[http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/651/1302654228623s.jpg/]![]()
I am now!SageRuffin said:You're not familiar of Sturgeon's Law, are you?darkless said:Sure I'm not a hard core fan but there are some anime and manga out there I like, a LOT of it is just fan service and crap though.
To answer the original question, I'm a fan, but I wouldn't call myself "hardcore". Sure I practice the art style and go to as many convention as I can and such, but I'm very picky when it comes to the subject matter of shows and manga.