runtheplacered said:
chronobreak said:
And would people stop using the term "homophobic". Nobody is scared of gay people, nobody is scared that they are secretly gay. It is a bullshit term meant to make people who aren't into the gay culture look like bigots. Why don't we start saying "straightophobe" too?
You're not an English major, are you? Homophobic is the official word in the English language for somebody who fears
or discriminates against gay people. You don't have to use the word, that's fine. But you're going to be hard pressed to have Mirriam-Webster stop publishing it.
I don't use the word to make straight people who "aren't into the gay culture" look like bigots. I use the word to make bigots look like bigots.
I know there's too many of these topics when I have to repeat myself every couple weeks.
No, I'm not an English major, not that I ever claimed to be anyways. What if someone doesn't fear gay people, and doesn't discriminate against them? For example, somebody who just doesn't agree with it, but has no problem dealing with gays on a regular basis, and can be quite nice to them, because we are all people. Would that person be a homophobe, or is it alright to disagree with the lifestyle while at the same time being respectful of their individual rights? Is that person a bigot because they can repectfully disagree, or can they just have the right to an opinion like everyone else?
I am against abortion, and would take part in protests or whatever, but I would never go up to a woman who has had an abortion and scream in her face. See what I'm saying?