As long as none of Robin's lines involve him yelling: "Holy (insert random word here) Batman!" I'm okay with him being around.
I. Do not. Want. Robin. Here.AccursedTheory said:Actually, batman is certifiably insane, and many of the comic writers of recent years have stressed this. Its also part of his relationship with the Joker: the Joker is really just Batman with a different focus (Batman is focused on absolute Justice, while the Joker is... well, Joker).Wizzie said:Batman isanything but crazy, to be honest.
But hey, why can't Robin work?
He doesn't have to be the goofy boy wonder, look at how Batman has evolved across the ages.
And WHICH Robin would you recommend, OP? There's been several, all with different personalities.
She's like 14 and there's implications that they fucked in Batman Beyond! Batman does not need the Commissioner Gordon's jailbait running around!Treblaine said:fuck, I'm the only one who voted batgirl... at the time I voted.
No, Batman needs bat-girl because everyone is sex crazed nowadays, if batman has a dog as his new sidekick people will ask "are they fucking?" (not really, but you know they would with Robin) so it might as well be an adult female human as a sidekick for now and get rid of the awkwardness.
I have a feeling you and I could become good friends (nice avatar, by the way)chozo_hybrid said:If Robin is done right, then hell yes!
Question to OP, have you ever read the comics much? Because he's certainly not there to make things family friendly.
Plus Dick became one of my favorite DC heroes, Nightwing. So if it led to eventual movie potential for Nightwing, then HELl to the YEAH!
Don't worry, the Joker will fix that!Blindswordmaster said:She's like 14 and there's implications that they fucked in Batman Beyond! Batman does not need the Commissioner Gordon's jailbait running around!Treblaine said:fuck, I'm the only one who voted batgirl... at the time I voted.
No, Batman needs bat-girl because everyone is sex crazed nowadays, if batman has a dog as his new sidekick people will ask "are they fucking?" (not really, but you know they would with Robin) so it might as well be an adult female human as a sidekick for now and get rid of the awkwardness.
Shocker. Not Electro, Shocker.AccursedTheory said:Don't worry, the Joker will fix that!Blindswordmaster said:She's like 14 and there's implications that they fucked in Batman Beyond! Batman does not need the Commissioner Gordon's jailbait running around!Treblaine said:fuck, I'm the only one who voted batgirl... at the time I voted.
No, Batman needs bat-girl because everyone is sex crazed nowadays, if batman has a dog as his new sidekick people will ask "are they fucking?" (not really, but you know they would with Robin) so it might as well be an adult female human as a sidekick for now and get rid of the awkwardness.
Oh wait, no more Joker... shit. Who's going to paralyze her?
Why does he need Robin?Blindswordmaster said:Movie Bob said something during his review of The Losers that made me cringe: he actually proposed that the current Batman movie series should have Robin. I don't think that Batman needs Robin. Robin makes him less dark and brooding. Robin makes Batman family friendly. Batman is crazy, determined, and kinda sadistic. Robin waters him down, makes him less awesome. Do you want Batman to have Robin? Would you still watch the current Batman movies if they introduced Robin? No flaming, no trolling, just polite debate. Go.
I feel your anger. Let it flow through you. Strike me down with your hate. Join the Bat side Tim, and together we will fight crime as father and adopted son! None shall stand against us!MelasZepheos said:irishdelinquent said:I'm going to be the only one who probably throws out his vote in favour of Robin.
Robin, as seen by many, is nothing but a hindrance; he's ass in a fight, he's useless as a detective, and he often is the bait for many a Bat-trap.I agree with AT on this one. Batman is a nutjob. Alan Moore stated about Rorsarch that he wrote the character like he was Batman but in the real world, in other words, Looney Tunes.AccursedTheory said:Actually, batman is certifiably insane, and many of the comic writers of recent years have stressed this. Its also part of his relationship with the Joker: the Joker is really just Batman with a different focus (Batman is focused on absolute Justice, while the Joker is... well, Joker).Wizzie said:Batman isanything but crazy, to be honest.
But hey, why can't Robin work?
He doesn't have to be the goofy boy wonder, look at how Batman has evolved across the ages.
And WHICH Robin would you recommend, OP? There's been several, all with different personalities.
Also, I'm going to nominate Tim Drake as the best Robin, because in the comic continuity anyway, it's stated by Batman himself that while Dick Grayson was in it for the fun, and Jason Todd was in it for the release of his anger, Tim Drake wants to be the world's greatest detective, and Batman thinks he really could be. Imagine that sort of Robin, not useless in a fight, not a constant bad guy bait, and actually good at deduction.
srsly? that's hilarious...AccursedTheory said:Christan Bale and Christopher Nolan both REFUSE to participate in the Batman movies if Robin comes in. So it a mute point.Blindswordmaster said:Movie Bob said something during his review of The Losers that made me cringe: he actually proposed that the current Batman movie series should have Robin. I don't think that Batman needs Robin. Robin makes him less dark and brooding. Robin makes Batman family friendly. Batman is crazy, determined, and kinda sadistic. Robin waters him down, makes him less awesome. Do you want Batman to have Robin? Would you still watch the current Batman movies if they introduced Robin? No flaming, no trolling, just polite debate. Go.