He can, typically if it's a game I really wanted ahead of time I will have bought it before his take on things comes up. If it's a title I'm taking a "wait and see" on, then when you look past his style he can be right on the money on a lot of things. The big questions are "does what he's saying bother me" and of course knowing what kinds of things he tends to value in games and what he doesn't like on principle, I know to take certain rants with a grain of salt.cairocat said:You know, the man who makes a show out of rants. His metaphor-filled warp-speed reviews (if you can call them that) roast through nearly every game they reach. From big-budget overhyped shooters to long-running and weird JRPGs the online-hating player has injured the pride of many a developer. But people take him seriously, and that is a surprising and sort of unnerving thing. In the comment threads (one you get past all of the thinly-masked first posts) there are basically three types of comments. There are those who, overtaken by fanboyism, either 'agree with his reasoning' or try to show him how he's wrong about their most loved/hated series. There are also those who merely enjoy the comedy, and waste good pixels quoting dialogue because they think it will be funnier the second time and typed out. But the last kind, and the one most startling, are those that go something like this:
"Wow, I'm glad I watched I was almost going to buy the game lalz"
This got me thinking. I love Zero Punctuation as much as the next guy does, but I would never have thought that his 'opinions' are taken seriously! People buying with his list must have pretty small libraries...
So, what about you guys? Does this influence your opinions?
He's not one of the major influancing forces, but what he decides to say DOES interest me.