Poll: Drugs and You.

[Artemis923]

I dislike them. I don't care what people do in their spare time, its not my business. My problem is where people get so addicted, they take up crime in an attempt to feed their addiction. Not particularly social. Then there's also the people who overdose-an unnecessary strain on our already overstretched healthcare system.

See Artemis? Someone with viable reasons.

Why I should have to explain my opinions to you is beyond me. Just accept the fact that I'm anti-drug and move on.

It's simple, your fight ageinst drugs is unfounded, some drugs diserve to be rid of, but not all of them.

Are you incapable of creating a logical arguement to support your theorys?

Your opinion means even less than his.

It's called spelling kids. Learn it.

By the gods, you guys are acting like I'm marching in the street protesting the end of all drugs. I honestly do not care what people do in their spare freaking time, so long as it doesn't infringe upon mine. Again, I was simply stating that I don't like drugs. Why is that so god damned hard to accept?!

I hate when someone who supports my point of view cannot spell. Really. It vexes me something awful. Also, "I don't like drugs" was not what you stated. What YOU said was, "Drugs are lame. The people who use drugs are lame." Now thats a personal slight against me and anyone else on this thread holding an opinion different to yours.

You see what's annoying there? You saying "Drugs are lame" is fine! It's your opinion and you have the right to such. But you called ME lame. You called anyone who uses drugs lame. And THAT is the problem.

That's like telling me it's a personal insult when I say I prefer PC gaming over console gaming. I'm sure the thousands of console players will not bat an eye or lose any sleep over the fact that I hold a different opinion than they do.

That was a very general statement I made.

And you have not helped in disproving it at all. The fact that you couldn't take it in stride, the fact that you felt the need to protest against some random guy's opinion, is lame.

Now I'm calling YOU, personally, LAME. I really want this argument to be over, but you won't freaking drop it. So keep it coming!

Also: If I say that drugs are lame, that usually implies that I don't like drugs.

 

[Blyyr]

I dislike them. I don't care what people do in their spare time, its not my business. My problem is where people get so addicted, they take up crime in an attempt to feed their addiction. Not particularly social. Then there's also the people who overdose-an unnecessary strain on our already overstretched healthcare system.

See Artemis? Someone with viable reasons.

Why I should have to explain my opinions to you is beyond me. Just accept the fact that I'm anti-drug and move on.

It's simple, your fight ageinst drugs is unfounded, some drugs diserve to be rid of, but not all of them.

Are you incapable of creating a logical arguement to support your theorys?

Your opinion means even less than his.

It's called spelling kids. Learn it.

By the gods, you guys are acting like I'm marching in the street protesting the end of all drugs. I honestly do not care what people do in their spare freaking time, so long as it doesn't infringe upon mine. Again, I was simply stating that I don't like drugs. Why is that so god damned hard to accept?!

I hate when someone who supports my point of view cannot spell. Really. It vexes me something awful. Also, "I don't like drugs" was not what you stated. What YOU said was, "Drugs are lame. The people who use drugs are lame." Now thats a personal slight against me and anyone else on this thread holding an opinion different to yours.

You see what's annoying there? You saying "Drugs are lame" is fine! It's your opinion and you have the right to such. But you called ME lame. You called anyone who uses drugs lame. And THAT is the problem.

One question my friend, are you going after me now because of my spelling?
Please, refrain from it. It's uncalled for, and there are many others worse then I am.

 

[whitelabel2k]

I dislike them. I don't care what people do in their spare time, its not my business. My problem is where people get so addicted, they take up crime in an attempt to feed their addiction. Not particularly social. Then there's also the people who overdose-an unnecessary strain on our already overstretched healthcare system.

See Artemis? Someone with viable reasons.

Why I should have to explain my opinions to you is beyond me. Just accept the fact that I'm anti-drug and move on.

It's simple, your fight ageinst drugs is unfounded, some drugs diserve to be rid of, but not all of them.

Are you incapable of creating a logical arguement to support your theorys?

Your opinion means even less than his.

It's called spelling kids. Learn it.

By the gods, you guys are acting like I'm marching in the street protesting the end of all drugs. I honestly do not care what people do in their spare freaking time, so long as it doesn't infringe upon mine. Again, I was simply stating that I don't like drugs. Why is that so god damned hard to accept?!

I hate when someone who supports my point of view cannot spell. Really. It vexes me something awful. Also, "I don't like drugs" was not what you stated. What YOU said was, "Drugs are lame. The people who use drugs are lame." Now thats a personal slight against me and anyone else on this thread holding an opinion different to yours.

You see what's annoying there? You saying "Drugs are lame" is fine! It's your opinion and you have the right to such. But you called ME lame. You called anyone who uses drugs lame. And THAT is the problem.

That's like telling me it's a personal insult when I say I prefer PC gaming over console gaming. I'm sure the thousands of console players will not bat an eye or lose any sleep over the fact that I hold a different opinion than they do.

That was a very general statement I made.

And you have not helped in disproving it at all. The fact that you couldn't take it in stride, the fact that you felt the need to protest against some random guy's opinion, is lame.

Now I'm calling YOU, personally, LAME. I really want this argument to be over, but you won't freaking drop it. So keep it coming!

Also: If I say that drugs are lame, that usually implies that I don't like drugs.

You have missed the point. Its not a personal insult if you say you prefer pc gaming to console gaming (you're correct there by the way). But if you say all people that use consoles are lame, that that IS a personal slight. As i stated earlier, you say drugs are lame, fine. You say everyone who does drugs is lame, not fine. Do you understand the point I'm making here. Its not for or against drugs, it's not for or against your opinion of drugs. Its against the manner in which you chose to express that, by declaring anyone who doesn't agree with you, lame.

Do you see?
Also, isn't arguing fun! And it is marvelous to see all these disgusting druggies are able to drag themselves to a keyboard and form cohesive arguments.

 

[Artemis923]

I dislike them. I don't care what people do in their spare time, its not my business. My problem is where people get so addicted, they take up crime in an attempt to feed their addiction. Not particularly social. Then there's also the people who overdose-an unnecessary strain on our already overstretched healthcare system.

See Artemis? Someone with viable reasons.

Why I should have to explain my opinions to you is beyond me. Just accept the fact that I'm anti-drug and move on.

It's simple, your fight ageinst drugs is unfounded, some drugs diserve to be rid of, but not all of them.

Are you incapable of creating a logical arguement to support your theorys?

Your opinion means even less than his.

It's called spelling kids. Learn it.

By the gods, you guys are acting like I'm marching in the street protesting the end of all drugs. I honestly do not care what people do in their spare freaking time, so long as it doesn't infringe upon mine. Again, I was simply stating that I don't like drugs. Why is that so god damned hard to accept?!

I hate when someone who supports my point of view cannot spell. Really. It vexes me something awful. Also, "I don't like drugs" was not what you stated. What YOU said was, "Drugs are lame. The people who use drugs are lame." Now thats a personal slight against me and anyone else on this thread holding an opinion different to yours.

You see what's annoying there? You saying "Drugs are lame" is fine! It's your opinion and you have the right to such. But you called ME lame. You called anyone who uses drugs lame. And THAT is the problem.

That's like telling me it's a personal insult when I say I prefer PC gaming over console gaming. I'm sure the thousands of console players will not bat an eye or lose any sleep over the fact that I hold a different opinion than they do.

That was a very general statement I made.

And you have not helped in disproving it at all. The fact that you couldn't take it in stride, the fact that you felt the need to protest against some random guy's opinion, is lame.

Now I'm calling YOU, personally, LAME. I really want this argument to be over, but you won't freaking drop it. So keep it coming!

Also: If I say that drugs are lame, that usually implies that I don't like drugs.

You have missed the point. Its not a personal insult if you say you prefer pc gaming to console gaming (you're correct there by the way). But if you say all people that use consoles are lame, that that IS a personal slight. As i stated earlier, you say drugs are lame, fine. You say everyone who does drugs is lame, not fine. Do you understand the point I'm making here. Its not for or against drugs, it's not for or against your opinion of drugs. Its against the manner in which you chose to express that, by declaring anyone who doesn't agree with you, lame.

Do you see?
Also, isn't arguing fun! And it is marvelous to see all these disgusting druggies are able to drag themselves to a keyboard and form cohesive arguments.

"This is what happens when an unstoppable force hits an unmovable obstacle..."

I never said ALL people. I merely said people. You ASSUME I mean ALL people who use drugs. I could've meant a very specific group of people, such as "People (in my town) who do drugs are lame." Or, "People who (rob, murder, and) do drugs are lame." You getting my point here? It was a very general statement, and I wrote it like that for a reason. And again, my opinion, and how I state said opinion, is mine to give. If you've been offended, then shake it off and move on.

And you're still taking this like I'm some Christ-driven fanatic who won't rest until the scourge of drugs is erased from the planet's surface!!! /sarcasm

I said nothing about "druggies" being disgusting. Nor did I call them (or you, I should say) druggies in the first place. I do applaud the fact that you haven't degenerated into the typical, "Well ur juzt a *random expletive*" that plagues the internet forums.

A worthy opponent indeed, and I tip my hat to you.

If I had a hat to tip.

 

[whitelabel2k]

I dislike them. I don't care what people do in their spare time, its not my business. My problem is where people get so addicted, they take up crime in an attempt to feed their addiction. Not particularly social. Then there's also the people who overdose-an unnecessary strain on our already overstretched healthcare system.

See Artemis? Someone with viable reasons.

Why I should have to explain my opinions to you is beyond me. Just accept the fact that I'm anti-drug and move on.

It's simple, your fight ageinst drugs is unfounded, some drugs diserve to be rid of, but not all of them.

Are you incapable of creating a logical arguement to support your theorys?

Your opinion means even less than his.

It's called spelling kids. Learn it.

By the gods, you guys are acting like I'm marching in the street protesting the end of all drugs. I honestly do not care what people do in their spare freaking time, so long as it doesn't infringe upon mine. Again, I was simply stating that I don't like drugs. Why is that so god damned hard to accept?!

I hate when someone who supports my point of view cannot spell. Really. It vexes me something awful. Also, "I don't like drugs" was not what you stated. What YOU said was, "Drugs are lame. The people who use drugs are lame." Now thats a personal slight against me and anyone else on this thread holding an opinion different to yours.

You see what's annoying there? You saying "Drugs are lame" is fine! It's your opinion and you have the right to such. But you called ME lame. You called anyone who uses drugs lame. And THAT is the problem.

That's like telling me it's a personal insult when I say I prefer PC gaming over console gaming. I'm sure the thousands of console players will not bat an eye or lose any sleep over the fact that I hold a different opinion than they do.

That was a very general statement I made.

And you have not helped in disproving it at all. The fact that you couldn't take it in stride, the fact that you felt the need to protest against some random guy's opinion, is lame.

Now I'm calling YOU, personally, LAME. I really want this argument to be over, but you won't freaking drop it. So keep it coming!

Also: If I say that drugs are lame, that usually implies that I don't like drugs.

You have missed the point. Its not a personal insult if you say you prefer pc gaming to console gaming (you're correct there by the way). But if you say all people that use consoles are lame, that that IS a personal slight. As i stated earlier, you say drugs are lame, fine. You say everyone who does drugs is lame, not fine. Do you understand the point I'm making here. Its not for or against drugs, it's not for or against your opinion of drugs. Its against the manner in which you chose to express that, by declaring anyone who doesn't agree with you, lame.

Do you see?
Also, isn't arguing fun! And it is marvelous to see all these disgusting druggies are able to drag themselves to a keyboard and form cohesive arguments.

"This is what happens when an unstoppable force hits an unmovable obstacle..."

I never said ALL people. I merely said people. You ASSUME I mean ALL people who use drugs. I could've meant a very specific group of people, such as "People (in my town) who do drugs are lame." Or, "People who (rob, murder, and) do drugs are lame." You getting my point here? It was a very general statement, and I wrote it like that for a reason. And again, my opinion, and how I state said opinion, is mine to give. If you've been offended, then shake it off and move on.

And you're still taking this like I'm some Christ-driven fanatic who won't rest until the scourge of drugs is erased from the planet's surface!!! /sarcasm

I said nothing about "druggies" being disgusting. Nor did I call them (or you, I should say) druggies in the first place. I do applaud the fact that you haven't degenerated into the typical, "Well ur juzt a *random expletive*" that plagues the internet forums.

A worthy opponent indeed, and I tip my hat to you.

If I had a hat to tip.

"The unstoppable force stops, the immovable object moves..."

So, your original statement, whilst open to interpretation in that manner, was not an in tentional slight against all drug users, merely the "bad" ones you are referencing now? Well if you hadn't been so ambiguous in the first place... But i jest, and also, a tip a hat to you. It IS nice when discussions online don't degrade into slanging matches.

 

[Artemis923]

I dislike them. I don't care what people do in their spare time, its not my business. My problem is where people get so addicted, they take up crime in an attempt to feed their addiction. Not particularly social. Then there's also the people who overdose-an unnecessary strain on our already overstretched healthcare system.

See Artemis? Someone with viable reasons.

Why I should have to explain my opinions to you is beyond me. Just accept the fact that I'm anti-drug and move on.

It's simple, your fight ageinst drugs is unfounded, some drugs diserve to be rid of, but not all of them.

Are you incapable of creating a logical arguement to support your theorys?

Your opinion means even less than his.

It's called spelling kids. Learn it.

By the gods, you guys are acting like I'm marching in the street protesting the end of all drugs. I honestly do not care what people do in their spare freaking time, so long as it doesn't infringe upon mine. Again, I was simply stating that I don't like drugs. Why is that so god damned hard to accept?!

I hate when someone who supports my point of view cannot spell. Really. It vexes me something awful. Also, "I don't like drugs" was not what you stated. What YOU said was, "Drugs are lame. The people who use drugs are lame." Now thats a personal slight against me and anyone else on this thread holding an opinion different to yours.

You see what's annoying there? You saying "Drugs are lame" is fine! It's your opinion and you have the right to such. But you called ME lame. You called anyone who uses drugs lame. And THAT is the problem.

That's like telling me it's a personal insult when I say I prefer PC gaming over console gaming. I'm sure the thousands of console players will not bat an eye or lose any sleep over the fact that I hold a different opinion than they do.

That was a very general statement I made.

And you have not helped in disproving it at all. The fact that you couldn't take it in stride, the fact that you felt the need to protest against some random guy's opinion, is lame.

Now I'm calling YOU, personally, LAME. I really want this argument to be over, but you won't freaking drop it. So keep it coming!

Also: If I say that drugs are lame, that usually implies that I don't like drugs.

You have missed the point. Its not a personal insult if you say you prefer pc gaming to console gaming (you're correct there by the way). But if you say all people that use consoles are lame, that that IS a personal slight. As i stated earlier, you say drugs are lame, fine. You say everyone who does drugs is lame, not fine. Do you understand the point I'm making here. Its not for or against drugs, it's not for or against your opinion of drugs. Its against the manner in which you chose to express that, by declaring anyone who doesn't agree with you, lame.

Do you see?
Also, isn't arguing fun! And it is marvelous to see all these disgusting druggies are able to drag themselves to a keyboard and form cohesive arguments.

"This is what happens when an unstoppable force hits an unmovable obstacle..."

I never said ALL people. I merely said people. You ASSUME I mean ALL people who use drugs. I could've meant a very specific group of people, such as "People (in my town) who do drugs are lame." Or, "People who (rob, murder, and) do drugs are lame." You getting my point here? It was a very general statement, and I wrote it like that for a reason. And again, my opinion, and how I state said opinion, is mine to give. If you've been offended, then shake it off and move on.

And you're still taking this like I'm some Christ-driven fanatic who won't rest until the scourge of drugs is erased from the planet's surface!!! /sarcasm

I said nothing about "druggies" being disgusting. Nor did I call them (or you, I should say) druggies in the first place. I do applaud the fact that you haven't degenerated into the typical, "Well ur juzt a *random expletive*" that plagues the internet forums.

A worthy opponent indeed, and I tip my hat to you.

If I had a hat to tip.

"The unstoppable force stops, the immovable object moves..."

So, your original statement, whilst open to interpretation in that manner, was not an in tentional slight against all drug users, merely the "bad" ones you are referencing now? Well if you hadn't been so ambiguous in the first place... But i jest, and also, a tip a hat to you. It IS nice when discussions online don't degrade into slanging matches.

Aye, indeed it is.

A truce, then. The battle ends in a draw. XD

 

[whitelabel2k]

i dont see any real reason to take drugs unless you are a hopeless addict

Ye Gods! I though forums were fpor discussion and debate! Not for blustering in, shouting an opinion with no back up whatsoever and generally being close minded.

Waaaait a minute. Sorry i forgot this was the internet.

Do you see no reason to drink unless you are a hopeless alcoholic?[/quote

first of all, sacristic butt-face, achohol was not mentioned in the threads creators original post. second of all, i dont drink. but waaaait, i forgot. you're a ******

1) Speeling.

Anyway, the fact that alcohol isn't mentioned in the original post doesn't detract from the hole it exposes in your logic.

And ******? I thought the internet was an accepting place. You drag down the rest of us ya damned bigot.

life isnt accepting. get used to it

So people should get used to bigotry? And the kind of idiocy a goon like you spouts?

You're not even funny with it. And you're on probation for being offensive in another thread, I think you're just a dick, mate. I mean, let's analyse your initial response... I like the subversive twist you used, what with the word "******". Employing such language really helps get your point across AND tells people you should be respected as a great thinker.

and isnt a bigot somebody who is intolerant of someone elses opinion? my opinion was that people have no reason to take drugs unless they are a hopeless addict. you decided to mock me with sarcasm. and so you called me closed minded and bigot without even taking my right to an opinion into consideration.
hypocrisy is thy name. thy name is yours

Now, as previously discussed in this thread the problem is not with your opinion on drugs, it's to do with your opinion of all drug users, including myself and others on this thread.

I decided to mock you with sarcasm because you called me a ******. I THINK that once you call the person your arguing with a "******" you lose any right to the moral high ground.

Almost all the other posters on this thread managed to have sensible discussions without resorting to the kind of childish name calling you have. You give the internet a bad name, you damned fool. And you DO have the right to an opinion, but when it classifies a huge swathe of society as "hopeless addicts" you should expect someone to call you up on it.

 

[Blyyr]

Alcohol should be the only legal drug because it is the only one that when drunk in the right quantities has no harm to the body and is actually healthy. in the right amounts. n o other drug has a "right amount".

Very Untrue, there are more Alcohol related deaths this year in the U.S then deaths based on consumption on light drugs, like Marijuana.

Like I've said to previous posters, don;t make assumptions unless you have done them yourself, and if you didn't like it, well, there are people that do, and neither, you, nor the government can do anything to stop it completely.

all alcohol related deaths have occurred because people went dangerously over the limit. the body can handle a certain amount of alcohol (the liver can anyway) before the alcohol goes into the bloodstream to wait for an empty liver. other drugs just attack the body. so like i said; Alcohol, in the right amounts is safe.

I never said there wasen't a "Right Amount" Of alcohol, I just said that your statement saying that there was "No other drug has a "Right amount""
Was false, there is the "Right amount" of... Well... Anything!

 

[whitelabel2k]

i dont see any real reason to take drugs unless you are a hopeless addict

Ye Gods! I though forums were fpor discussion and debate! Not for blustering in, shouting an opinion with no back up whatsoever and generally being close minded.

Waaaait a minute. Sorry i forgot this was the internet.

Do you see no reason to drink unless you are a hopeless alcoholic?[/quote

first of all, sacristic butt-face, achohol was not mentioned in the threads creators original post. second of all, i dont drink. but waaaait, i forgot. you're a ******

1) Speeling.

Anyway, the fact that alcohol isn't mentioned in the original post doesn't detract from the hole it exposes in your logic.

And ******? I thought the internet was an accepting place. You drag down the rest of us ya damned bigot.

life isnt accepting. get used to it

So people should get used to bigotry? And the kind of idiocy a goon like you spouts?

You're not even funny with it. And you're on probation for being offensive in another thread, I think you're just a dick, mate. I mean, let's analyse your initial response... I like the subversive twist you used, what with the word "******". Employing such language really helps get your point across AND tells people you should be respected as a great thinker.

and isnt a bigot somebody who is intolerant of someone elses opinion? my opinion was that people have no reason to take drugs unless they are a hopeless addict. you decided to mock me with sarcasm. and so you called me closed minded and bigot without even taking my right to an opinion into consideration.
hypocrisy is thy name. thy name is yours

Now, as previously discussed in this thread the problem is not with your opinion on drugs, it's to do with your opinion of all drug users, including myself and others on this thread.

I decided to mock you with sarcasm because you called me a ******. I THINK that once you call the person your arguing with a "******" you lose any right to the moral high ground.

Almost all the other posters on this thread managed to have sensible discussions without resorting to the kind of childish name calling you have. You give the internet a bad name, you damned fool. And you DO have the right to an opinion, but when it classifies a huge swathe of society as "hopeless addicts" you should expect someone to call you up on it.

nooooo. you used sarcasm first before i call you a ******. thats why i called you a ******

i dont see any real reason to take drugs unless you are a hopeless addict

Ye Gods! I though forums were fpor discussion and debate! Not for blustering in, shouting an opinion with no back up whatsoever and generally being close minded.

Waaaait a minute. Sorry i forgot this was the internet.

Do you see no reason to drink unless you are a hopeless alcoholic?[/quote

first of all, sacristic butt-face, achohol was not mentioned in the threads creators original post. second of all, i dont drink. but waaaait, i forgot. you're a ******

1) Speeling.

Anyway, the fact that alcohol isn't mentioned in the original post doesn't detract from the hole it exposes in your logic.

And ******? I thought the internet was an accepting place. You drag down the rest of us ya damned bigot.

life isnt accepting. get used to it

So people should get used to bigotry? And the kind of idiocy a goon like you spouts?

You're not even funny with it. And you're on probation for being offensive in another thread, I think you're just a dick, mate. I mean, let's analyse your initial response... I like the subversive twist you used, what with the word "******". Employing such language really helps get your point across AND tells people you should be respected as a great thinker.

and isnt a bigot somebody who is intolerant of someone elses opinion? my opinion was that people have no reason to take drugs unless they are a hopeless addict. you decided to mock me with sarcasm. and so you called me closed minded and bigot without even taking my right to an opinion into consideration.
hypocrisy is thy name. thy name is yours

Now, as previously discussed in this thread the problem is not with your opinion on drugs, it's to do with your opinion of all drug users, including myself and others on this thread.

I decided to mock you with sarcasm because you called me a ******. I THINK that once you call the person your arguing with a "******" you lose any right to the moral high ground.

Almost all the other posters on this thread managed to have sensible discussions without resorting to the kind of childish name calling you have. You give the internet a bad name, you damned fool. And you DO have the right to an opinion, but when it classifies a huge swathe of society as "hopeless addicts" you should expect someone to call you up on it.

nooooo. you used sarcasm first before i call you a ******. thats why i called you a ******

Because a jot of sarcasm justifies hate-speech? In any case, you're incorrect. Go check. In any case, my initial statement in response to you was pointing out the irony of demanding a fair debate online.

And my case for you being a dick since the utterance of the word "******" still stands you petty, close minded, reactionary..... but no, I'll stop. Because I am capable of a conversation online whilst you seem to prefer tossing vocal feces.