If you could would you choose to stop having emotions and just always be calm and reasonable rather than getting sad, happy, jealous?
-isn't a sign of emotionlessness, it's a sign of self-control.Benn_Walden said:always being calm and reasonable rather than getting sad, happy, or jealous
Damn, beaten to the punch.JUMBO PALACE said:SNIP
How do you figure? The emotion of greed is the engine of capitalism. The emotions of displeasure with inefficency is what drives invention. Do i even need to mention what would happen to the arts?will1182 said:The human race would be much more efficient and there would be a lot less problems in the world, but it would make life as we know it boring and uninteresting. I wouldn't be willing to make that sacrifice.
That makes no fucking sense. Removal of emotions would also remove a fundamental part of reason. Yes i know humans have some weirdo concept of emotions (just another one of their many dichotomies that are based on..... nothingness) - they even consider them isolated from reason/logic - still doesn't mean i need to follow this baseless bullshit.If you could would you choose to stop having emotions and just always be calm and reasonable rather than getting sad, happy, jealous?
YES, IT DOES! It's called "signal" there. Have fun programming without signal-style return values (hint: Its impossible, because even the most basic logical decisions will become undoable). Does that mean that a computer "feels" stuff? Not necessarily, because so far computers are not aware.Does a computer need emotion to do its work?