I put it in the same group as Harry Potter. "Someone else better idea with enough stupid to give it mass appeal". (Anyone who ever read Neil Gaiman's The books of magic knows what I mean.)
Good 'my age' book then...Mookie_Magnus said:It's not even a children's book. If you've noticed, there's a lot of descriptive gore, and plenty of mention of sex.Jedamethis said:Well, I never noticed it was a ripoff of anything, so it's a good childrens book...
Personally, I like the series. Sure, you can argue that it follows a similar formula as the original Star Wars trilogy. Then again, so did Final Fantasy XII, and many other stories. That formula is very old and will continue to be used in the future.
The Inheritance series is a well-written piece of good storytelling. Sure, it may have taken from other books before it, but it does a good job for what it is. Besides, nothing you say will have any impact on how many copies the fourth book sells.
Yes and no -- you're talking about two different things, here.Time Warp said:Oh, my previous post is fat enough as it is...
Please do not talk about ripping off when it comes to fantasy.
Really. You're not looking smart, if you don't like it - just say you don't. Because if we're going to talk about ripping off, that's what the whole genre is about. Creatures from traditional mythology, very often ripped off and re-used unaltered? Check! Traditional themes? Check! The whole template with dwarves/ elves? Check! And a lot, a LOT of other things.
and that doesn't necessarily make it a bad thing. There are only this many patterns to stories. I believe that there was a big research project some time ago, when they found out that there are only a few hundred plots, overall, shared by every damn story out there with minor alterations.
So I wouldn't worry about that.
But personally, I'm not a big fan of traditional heroic pattern sort of thing, and not a big fan of these series either.
thisWasder said:I liked the book. Although the story is pretty ripped-off, there are a lot of interesting ideas in the book and he has a good style. The film though, was shite.
Film? You think the film was the original Dante's Inferno?Hubilub said:Read the book, and it was indeed a rip-off.
And Dante's Inferno looks like the most original game ever compared to the film.
For Le Guin's sake, her other books had better be better than Wizard of Earthsea. It was more telling than showing, the events fly by way too fast for anything to develop from them, and the second half of the book insulted my intelligence - it consists almost entirely of Ged running around moaning about how he'll never conquer the shadow without knowing its name, yet I knew what its name was since the meeting with the dragon, as should any reader with an IQ higher than their shoe size because it's oh-so obvious and cliched, yet Ged didn't figure it out until the third to last page.Time Warp said:Edit: Ohhh, and Ursula Le Guin, too. Her fantasy books are amazing.