Poll: Fahrenheit or Celsius?

Recommended Videos

WayOutThere

New member
Aug 1, 2009
1,030
0
0
The Kangaroo said:
Also the thing about Fahrenheit being based off of humans is all well and good until you realise that it's all relative to the person while Celsius is based off of a constant.
It?s relative to where you live which admittedly is a good argument. While the loosley defined variables(hottest and coldest it is likely to get) provieds flexibility so the Fahrenheit tempeture scale can be applied to different regions with relatively similar climates Fahrenheit too is based off a constant which is the altered boiling and freezing point of water. It is flexible in everyday usage while precise in scientific usage.

I think that argument makes sense.

SikOseph said:
Celsius makes more sense than Farenheit, and Kelvin is just Celsius adjusted to absolute 0. So kelvin makes most sense, and celsius is most convenient in every day parlance. Farenheit does not, as the OP claims, account for the highest and lowest temperature that one will experience between 0 and 100. Try thinking outside your hometown OP.
Yes different climates will make a diffrence of course. However, the variables of "hottest it is likely to get" and "coldest it is likely to get" are loosely defined providing for some flexibility.
 

Eric the Orange

Gone Gonzo
Apr 29, 2008
3,245
0
0
WayOutThere said:
Fahrenheit is more arbitrary being based on the freezing and boiling points of water after they have been altered but outside chemicals.
I learned that Fahrenheit was based off of weather. The story I was told was that a man in Germany had an unmarked tube of mercury and that he marked it every day. And at the end of the year he made the lowest mark 0 and the highest mark 100.
 

FactualSquirrel

New member
Dec 10, 2009
2,316
0
0
celsius for me. Last time I checked farenheit looked outdated and kinda random. I think that we should all convert to metric. But then again thats just my opinion, and i guess that none of them really make any difference anyway
 

SantoUno

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,583
0
0
Can't say, celcius is much simpler but since I was raised in the US I got used to farenheit so celcius confuses me.
 

wizzerd229

Man of many Ideas
May 22, 2009
652
0
0
Souplex said:
Temperatures should be measured in farenheit, people should drive on the right side of the road, and we should all abandon the metric system in favor of whatever America's system is called!
WOO, GO 'MURICA
OT:in reality i am rather scientific, so C in academics, F in real life, so basicly, outside school, F C
 

Steelfox

New member
Nov 17, 2009
21
0
0
As an American raised with inches, feet, miles... Fahrenheit I would rather the country switch over to metric.

Yay Celsius!
 

Bobbovski

New member
May 19, 2008
574
0
0
Celcius. Don't understand Farenheit and celcius seems more logical to use. It's easy to understand that it's very hot if water starts to boil (100 C) and it's easy to understand that it's pretty darn cold if water starts to freeze (0 C).


Also, the celcius system gets bonus points from me because the system's creator comes from my country.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Celsius
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,749
6
43
Country
USA
Wow, so much hate for Fahrenheit in the polls. I used to like Celsius more because it was based off of water, then I realized that Fahrenheit allows you to measure smaller changes with whole numbers. I don't need to know it's 22.5 degrees, just give me a straight full number like 70.
 

Pingieking

New member
Sep 19, 2009
1,362
0
0
Kelvin. A system where zero is impossible is automatically more awesome than the rest of them.
 

The Heik

King of the Nael
Oct 12, 2008
1,568
0
0
I prefer Celsius because it makes more sense to me. When the temp turns zero, we see the turning point between warm and cold. Fahrenheit just doesn't have any common applications in my life
 

Avaholic03

New member
May 11, 2009
1,520
0
0
The Kangaroo said:
Celsius as it it the scientific standard.

And Kelvin is based off Celsius

Edit: Also the thing about Fahrenheit being based off of humans is all well and good until you realise that it's all relative to the person while Celsius is based off of a constant.
Just realize a few things. First, Fahrenheit has an absolute scale as well. It's called Rankine. So both are equally viable to use scientifically.

Also, water freezing and boiling aren't constants necessarily. I live in Denver, Colorado. Water boils at about 95°C here, and likewise the freezing temp isn't exactly 0°F. Almost nobody lives at standard atmospheric conditions (used to determine Celsius), so it's relative as well.

That being said, I don't care which scale we use. Ideally, I wish everyone could all agree to speak English and use the Metric system...a fair compromise IMO, and would vastly improve communication and collaboration.
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,749
6
43
Country
USA
Eric the Orange said:
WayOutThere said:
Fahrenheit is more arbitrary being based on the freezing and boiling points of water after they have been altered but outside chemicals.
I learned that Fahrenheit was based off of weather. The story I was told was that a man in Germany had an unmarked tube of mercury and that he marked it every day. And at the end of the year he made the lowest mark 0 and the highest mark 100.
From Wiki:
wiki said:
According to a journal article Fahrenheit wrote in 1724,[3] he based his scale on three reference points of temperature. The zero point is determined by placing the thermometer in brine: he used a mixture of ice, water, and ammonium chloride, a salt. This is a type of frigorific mixture. The mixture automatically stabilizes its temperature at 0 °F. He then put a thermometer into the mixture and let the liquid in the thermometer descend to its lowest point. The second point is the 32 degree found by putting the thermometer in still water as ice is just forming on the surface.[4] The third point, the 96 degree, was the level of the liquid in the thermometer when held in the mouth or under the armpit. Fahrenheit noted that, using this scale, mercury boils at around 600 degrees.

Later, work by other scientists observed that water boils about 180 degrees higher than the freezing point and decided to redefine the degree slightly to make it exactly 180 degrees higher.[3] It is for this reason that normal body temperature is 98 on the revised scale (whereas it was 96 on Fahrenheit's original scale).[5]

According to a letter Fahrenheit wrote to his friend Herman Boerhaave,[6] his scale built on the work of Ole Rømer, whom he had met earlier. In Rømer?s scale, the two fixed reference points are that brine also freezes at 0 degrees and water boils at 60 degrees. He observed that, on this scale, water freezes at 7.5 degrees. Fahrenheit multiplied each value by four in order to eliminate fractions and increase the granularity of the scale (resulting in 30 and 240 degrees, respectively). He then re-calibrated his scale between the freezing point of water and normal human body temperature (which he observed to be 96 degrees); he adjusted the scale so that the melting point of ice would be 32 degrees, so that 64 intervals would separate the two, allowing him to mark degree lines on his instruments by simply bisecting the interval six times (since 64 is 2 to the sixth power).[7]
TOTALLY fucking random measurement system, but like I said in my other post, it allows us to measure smaller adjustments in temperature, so I'm cool with it. I don't see why it should be used in anything outside of weather or climate though.
 

Thedutchjelle

New member
Mar 31, 2009
784
0
0
Avaholic03 said:
The Kangaroo said:
Celsius as it it the scientific standard.

And Kelvin is based off Celsius

Edit: Also the thing about Fahrenheit being based off of humans is all well and good until you realise that it's all relative to the person while Celsius is based off of a constant.
Just realize a few things. First, Fahrenheit has an absolute scale as well. It's called Rankine. So both are equally viable to use scientifically.

Also, water freezing and boiling aren't constants necessarily. I live in Denver, Colorado. Water boils at about 95°C here, and likewise the freezing temp isn't exactly 0°F. Almost nobody lives at standard atmospheric conditions (used to determine Celsius), so it's relative as well.
Kelvin is a SI unit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI) - it's a standard, that all the scientific community uses. Only a tiny minority of countries are not using those. I'm only doing highschool, but during our physics classes i'm seeing loads of formulas that work neatly with Celsius/Kelvin and the metric system.

A good thermometer is build to catch that difference in athmosphere, i think. So that when it says 100 celsius, it is in fact 100 celsius as by the standard definition.

Anyway, born and raised in Europe, so I'm all Celsius! woot!
 

matumba

New member
Nov 1, 2007
61
0
0
If we Americans go Celsius we might as well go metric. If we go metric we might as well beg England to take us back as a colony and apologize to Europeans for centuries of annoyance. Fuck that noise.