It?s relative to where you live which admittedly is a good argument. While the loosley defined variables(hottest and coldest it is likely to get) provieds flexibility so the Fahrenheit tempeture scale can be applied to different regions with relatively similar climates Fahrenheit too is based off a constant which is the altered boiling and freezing point of water. It is flexible in everyday usage while precise in scientific usage.The Kangaroo said:Also the thing about Fahrenheit being based off of humans is all well and good until you realise that it's all relative to the person while Celsius is based off of a constant.
I think that argument makes sense.
Yes different climates will make a diffrence of course. However, the variables of "hottest it is likely to get" and "coldest it is likely to get" are loosely defined providing for some flexibility.SikOseph said:Celsius makes more sense than Farenheit, and Kelvin is just Celsius adjusted to absolute 0. So kelvin makes most sense, and celsius is most convenient in every day parlance. Farenheit does not, as the OP claims, account for the highest and lowest temperature that one will experience between 0 and 100. Try thinking outside your hometown OP.