SamuelT said:In all seriousness; nothing you listed really seemed like anything outside what a normal person would do. Using 'calculated phrases' and 'psychological reasoning' in conversation is what most people would attribute as social skills, not science.
Stammer said:I wouldn't even consider using "science" as a way of explaining it. To me it just sounds like common sense.
This, this, and this express my thoughts on the matter pretty well. It's not a science, it's social skills.Shpongled said:Sounds to me like you're making more of this than it actually is.
If it extends to more than social skills, it's called being manipulative. That's not really allowed, but, let's be honest, it happens all the time anyway.
That's what everyone does.Direwolf750 said:When you run through conversation possibilities and choose which words you think will result in the least amount of conflict, I don't consider it social skills. Social skills are knowing the right words to say at that moment. Science is working them out beforehand.
If you're expecting an argument, you run over ways it can play out in your head over and over again to try and find the right words to reduce conflict or win or get what you want.
I think you're just splitting hairs to make yourself sound clever. Nothing so far seems like the use of science, just application of empathy and a little consideration/manipulation.