Poll: Game Overthinker After Mass and after thoughts

Recommended Videos

370999

New member
May 17, 2010
1,107
0
0
Devoneaux said:
malestrithe said:
Fappy said:
Watergate was the 70's fyi.
Meant to say Whitewater. But you knew that and wanted to troll me.
You can only troll someone who makes it possible, and that's assuming he is trolling.

Now in all seriousness, I really hope that for his sake alone, The last ten minutes of The Avengers...SUCKS. Just so I can believe in the existence of karma.
It has to suck but then it turns out the original didn't suck. And they then offer to sell it for dedicated fans.

I would piss myself laughing.
 

RQshadowe

New member
May 22, 2010
18
0
0
He is a movie reviewer, I watch moviebob and I occasionally watch the big picture. I like the guy and it seems he knows of lot of interesting stuff (especially core nerd fandom related stuff, which i'll be honest has never really interested me, but bob manages to make interesting and he actually got my psyched about seeing the avengers movie) BUT his opinion on games means jack, and he can come across as being extremely ignorant about certain topics and I think he is a little to much *comic book guy* to be ever taken perfectly seriously.
 

Nargleblarg

New member
Jun 24, 2008
1,583
0
0
Fappy said:
MovieBob's been falling out of favor with me for several months now. His resent whine-fest regarding ME3 was the final nail in the coffin as far as I am concerned.
Agreed, most of his shows have really slowed down to the point I've stopped even watching, and the ME3 jab sealed the deal. It was an unprofessional move and the audacity of it was just shocking. It was basically him mocking his audience like some kind of nostalgic elitist.

He seems to have completely forgotten his audience and the themes of his shows have drastically deviated course. He doesn't understand that the main appeal of his shows were that they were informative and while he may have mentioned his own opinion it was never to the point it was never the point that it was a problem. Sure I disagreed with some of his opinion before but he would argue his thinking in a logically structured manner causing me to at least see into his way of thinking. (most of the time)

Now it's just a trite pandering few minutes on why he thinks ______ is bad for _______. All usually ending that it's modern day ignorant games/gamers fault. (note: this is his main audience)
 

Mylinkay Asdara

Waiting watcher
Nov 28, 2010
934
0
0
370999 said:
Mylinkay Asdara said:
It's harder than it sounds, but every time I go to click his stuff here I just remember how much I dislike being called a whiny baby *****. Usually does the trick.
I think quite a few of them have never actually been on the side he has argued against so they didn't notice just how blatant his straw-manning and ignorance was. If you agree with Bob, and sometimes you will, it is easy to overlook his excesses as you justify them as being right in spirit or all in good fun.

However once you actually examine what he's talking about his whole argument falls to pieces.

Or maybe I'm one of those evil 90s jocks who because of my dislike of say sucker-punch and Scott Pilgrim (I actually like that movie) and we should be glad that Bob was bullied by my hands so that he could rise to glory and spread his benevolent "wisdom" to the good children of the internet.

Or maybe he is an arrogant, ignorant, pretentious douche-bag who squanders his intellect by never challenging his assumption or actually doing any research. Which is a shame.

I'll let you decide!
I wrote him a message (which I knew then he probably wouldn't read) just asking him to look into what he was talking about a bit more and make an attempt at seeing the other side of the argument. I see his side - minus the name calling and the hyperbole, there's a point to be made about what it could set as precedent for a company to make such a change based on this type of reaction and there's a widely embraced philosophy that what we get is what we have to live with. I don't agree, but I see the logic and I understand the concern. I just wanted him to take a look at the same thing on the other side. He hasn't. He won't. I'm not interested in people who can't be bothered to be open to different perspectives. It's a bummer too, because I followed Big Picture and his movie reviews - looked forward to them. I just won't play them anymore though - my click is the only voice I get with someone who's going to ignore all comments, so I'm using it.
 

Freechoice

New member
Dec 6, 2010
1,019
0
0
malestrithe said:
Boy Bands
Clinton Sex scandals
FoxNews becoming a political force
Right Wing Punditry in general
Dawson's Creek
7th Heaven
MTV becoming less Diverse, more willing to listen to corporate interests
First Gulf War
Waco Texas
You want me to go through that and point out what's bad and what's hilarious? Half of it is hilarious.

'sides, even if I did the fair thing and compared the best of the 90's to the best of 80's... 90's win.

By far.


FABULOUS SECRET POWERS
 

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
malestrithe said:
Freechoice said:
But we can objectively say a lot of things were shitty about the 80's.

The Reagan administration
The Smurfs
Retarded action movies
My Little Pony (it wasn't FIM)
Lennon was killed
AIDS pandemic began

Now look at the 90's
Nickelodeon had great programming.
Cartoon Network had great programming.
The internet was becoming mainstream.
N64, Dreamcast, PS1
Star Trek: TNG started being good in the 90's
Simpsons was at its height in the 90's.
The Matrix

That's just a few things.

Look at all of this stuff.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990s

It's fucking amazing.

Also, That 80's Show failed hard.
That 80's show failed not because the 80s sucked, but it was a terrible idea.

You are making the same mistake that Moviebob and other nostalgia people are doing. You are stacking the deck trying to make the argument more one sided better than it actually is. You are taking one decade's highlights and comparing them to another's lowlights.

Or as someone so elegantly put it. "Yes, I know there were bad things from those decades. I just choose not think about them."

No decade is perfect. It only seems perfect when you look at them through the lens of nostalgia.

Also, if you think about it. here are some bad things about the 90s

Boy Bands
Clinton Sex scandals
FoxNews becoming a political force
Right Wing Punditry in general
Dawson's Creek
7th Heaven
MTV becoming less Diverse, more willing to listen to corporate interests
First Gulf War
Waco Texas
Freechoice said:
But we can objectively say a lot of things were shitty about the 80's.

The Reagan administration
The Smurfs
Retarded action movies
My Little Pony (it wasn't FIM)
Lennon was killed
AIDS pandemic began

Now look at the 90's
Nickelodeon had great programming.
Cartoon Network had great programming.
The internet was becoming mainstream.
N64, Dreamcast, PS1
Star Trek: TNG started being good in the 90's
Simpsons was at its height in the 90's.
The Matrix

That's just a few things.

Look at all of this stuff.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990s

It's fucking amazing.

Also, That 80's Show failed hard.
Ah, I was thinking along similar lines

Remember, while the 90's excelled in many things they also popularized those stupid saggy pants fashion trend, The Phantom Menace was brought into existance, the popularity of boy bands exploded and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act was created.

Also for kids who were in a house with one tv, many days were spent watching things like the OJ trial and news about Clinton's humping partner instead of the Simpsons that usually aired around that timeslot.

Oh yeah, remember the fear of Y2K bug. All digital clocks would go from 99 to 00 which would somehow cause the world's supply of nukes to autofire(targeting every major city, naturally) and destroy us all. Still a better story than the 2012 Mayan apocalypse though.

There was a lot of great things that came out of the 90s but there was a lot of shite too.

There was also Jackass Thompson using the Colombine shooting to further his political views.
 

370999

New member
May 17, 2010
1,107
0
0
Mylinkay Asdara said:
I wrote him a message (which I knew then he probably wouldn't read) just asking him to look into what he was talking about a bit more and make an attempt at seeing the other side of the argument. I see his side - minus the name calling and the hyperbole, there's a point to be made about what it could set as precedent for a company to make such a change based on this type of reaction and there's a widely embraced philosophy that what we get is what we have to live with. I don't agree, but I see the logic and I understand the concern. I just wanted him to take a look at the same thing on the other side. He hasn't. He won't. I'm not interested in people who can't be bothered to be open to different perspectives. It's a bummer too, because I followed Big Picture and his movie reviews - looked forward to them. I just won't play them anymore though - my click is the only voice I get with someone who's going to ignore all comments, so I'm using it.
Oh I get you. I think people on his side don't realize just how noxious what he's saying is to their argument. I remember debating with someone on this forum about retake ME and he brought up how there was a failure to deal with the crazy elements in the group, and he was right in saying that but I could instantly bring up Bob as a response.

Because no matte how easy Bob finds it to knock down a strawman, it is even easier for move to point to his video and say "People like this don't get it".

And I feel that does rob that side of the argument, and I do think this is an discussion that should happen, of rationality. And I think this applies to anything Bob touches, even the stuff I agree with him on, you do have to divorce yourself from him, say "This guy agrees with me but he's just the extreme fringe" and in a way that's quite the tragic position for bob to let himself fall into.

Look I'm pretty similar to you, his Mass Effect video was where I said no more. I then looked at the comments to the Raid review and apparently he went on a huge tangent about American Pie: Reunion and how high school sucks, so I didn't feel that I lost too much.

I think fundamentally it comes down to an unwillingness or a lack of ability to divorce Bob the person from the reviews/arguments/etc he outputs beyond which is normally acceptable. Which always tarnishes them by making them of limited utility to anyone not MovieBob.

Bob isn't a stupid man. Nowhere near as clever as he thinks but not stupid. But he is so lazy and holds his viewers in such contempt to not even bother to attempt research is well, insulting.

Clearly he get's views though so in the end I'll avoid him and I will suggest to the Escapist community at large to just keep in mind that if Bob won't even do you the courtesy of providing a well researched argument then why should you do the courtesy of watching it?
 

Mylinkay Asdara

Waiting watcher
Nov 28, 2010
934
0
0
370999 said:
Oh I get you. I think people on his side don't realize just how noxious what he's saying is to their argument. I remember debating with someone on this forum about retake ME and he brought up how there was a failure to deal with the crazy elements in the group, and he was right in saying that but I could instantly bring up Bob as a response.

Because no matte how easy Bob finds it to knock down a strawman, it is even easier for move to point to his video and say "People like this don't get it".

And I feel that does rob that side of the argument, and I do think this is an discussion that should happen, of rationality. And I think this applies to anything Bob touches, even the stuff I agree with him on, you do have to divorce yourself from him, say "This guy agrees with me but he's just the extreme fringe" and in a way that's quite the tragic position for bob to let himself fall into.

Look I'm pretty similar to you, his Mass Effect video was where I said no more. I then looked at the comments to the Raid review and apparently he went on a huge tangent about American Pie: Reunion and how high school sucks, so I didn't feel that I lost too much.

I think fundamentally it comes down to an unwillingness or a lack of ability to divorce Bob the person from the reviews/arguments/etc he outputs beyond which is normally acceptable. Which always tarnishes them by making them of limited utility to anyone not MovieBob.

Bob isn't a stupid man. Nowhere near as clever as he thinks but not stupid. But he is so lazy and holds his viewers in such contempt to not even bother to attempt research is well, insulting.

Clearly he get's views though so in the end I'll avoid him and I will suggest to the Escapist community at large to just keep in mind that if Bob won't even do you the courtesy of providing a well researched argument then why should you do the courtesy of watching it?
Agreed. It's a shame though, always, when people who could be more choose not to be.
 

00slash00

New member
Dec 29, 2009
2,321
0
0
words i never want to hear again, "mass effect 3 ending." i dont care if you liked it or hated it, i am just so fucking sick of hearing about it. let it go, it really doesnt matter that much.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
I like Bob. I don't agree with his tastes in movies, and I generally avoid Escape as a result but I like the bigger Picture and sometimes check out his other stuff (Game OverThinker, as this thread covers).

However, he's acting like a child and calling other people childish. I'm not sure if he's just doing this as a gimmick for hits or has no sense of irony, but consider he does a lot of things he complains about RME doing, it's still rather ridiculous.

Mydogisblue said:
Consumer Rights.
Don't worry. Thanks to complacent consumers, we won't have any soon.
 

RaikuFA

New member
Jun 12, 2009
4,370
0
0
SirBryghtside said:
So you're arguing with his opinion. Congratulations, you got the point.

Just to clear the waters before I dive in, I'm not saying that Bob's a troll here. At all.

But he's made a video, of his opinion, for the viewer to agree or disagree with. You disagree. Other people agree. There's no be all end all view on this - there's no be all end all view on anything. He's presenting his opinion in the way he sees fit. If you feel it's insulting towards you personally - you know, I don't even have to explain this part, he explained it himself in crystal clear terms three minutes into the video, unless Navi's voice is a couple Hertz above your hearing range.

But by all means, think that you're in some way superior to him by resorting to personal attacks. Ever heard the one about the pot and the kettle?

[sub]Note: not all of this is directed at the OP, or indeed you, dear reader. It's just an outlash against the general trend.[/sub]
This. So much this. I'm sick of the bashing on him. I don't mind if you disagree, but EVERYTHING he brings up thats not ME3 related there's someone whos gotta insult him over it.

And his GO thing is worse. His ep on companies needing to open their back catalog? People were bashing him for thinking that. How bout when he mentions how Japanese companies need to get off their high horse and release more games in the states because its hurting the American fans? Well to his "fans" he was the spawn of Satan because Japan is the worst country to people these days.
 

Murmillos

Silly Deerthing
Feb 13, 2011
359
0
0
The biggest thing I think Bob is missing about the ending, is not that its "bad" or its "not the ending we want" but that it openly volatiles the medium of story telling as we know it.

It changes the underlying theme (plot motivation) of the story, nullifies the antagonist and replaces the protagonist. It "attempts" to do all of that in 14 lines of dialog with no fore shadowing, all while violating the universes own set up rules and logic.
If you just "watch" the ending then sure, the ending just appears to "just look bad". But that is like picking up some random book, reading the last 3 pages and then making a statement that anybody who dislikes that ending is "entitled" or what ever flippant remark makes him feel superior.

To understand the hatred of the ending of ME3 relies on understanding the players previous invested game play. If you are not willing to the take time to understand the theme of the story, who is the protagonist, who is the antagonist, then you can't lay judgment against those who do.

Since Bob use Godfather as an example - to counter his example; the ending is not in the sad submission that he still ends up being what he tired so hard NOT to become, but that in the final 5 minutes of the movie, all of his closest friends around him are shot to death by the rival gang, and then suddenly an angel shows up and tells him he has to make a choice between coming a clown, a taxi driver or a nun. On making a said random choice, we watch all of the worlds highways being blown up and two people who we where shown just got shot to death are now shown stepping of a boat, now marooned on a island in the middle nowhere, with nary a bullet hole on them.


We can't take ME3 ending serious, because it doesn't take its players serious. How can we respect the medium, when its the medium has shown it doesn't wish to be taken with respect. I guess you could say that gamers should have taken the highroad on the matter, but then again, we never expected BioWare to crash so lowly.
 

Innocent Bystander

New member
Jan 29, 2012
59
0
0
DVS BSTrD said:
Lovely Mixture said:
It's important to note that he has had much flack in the past for things not limited to but including: defending Other M, calling the Halo series racist, and (this is one is probably the worst offender) liking Spider-Man 3.
How could he!?! HOW could he call Halo racist?
Pretty easily I guess. If you go hunting for witches, you're going to find a witch. Go hunting for racism...
Basically he brought up some factors that, if gathered together largely without context and viewed through the correct lens, might point towards there being some racist undertones. The thing is that if I look hard enough at any franchise, I could start pulling out things that are potentially racist (for example, Endermen in Minecraft are black, attack if stared at and steal your blocks. Therefore Minecraft is racist). The games aren't really racist, and playing them doesn't make you some sort of white supremacist. It just means that certain people are going to start gathering pitchforks and torches based on their own delusions.
 

Metalix Knightmare

New member
Sep 27, 2007
831
0
0
MacNille said:
Don't forget,this have set gaming back a whole TEN YEARS (yes, Moviebob said that on his twets). His points are fucking stupid. That he doesn't "get it" that we don't like it for being a downer ending. It's because it makes no fucking sense!
Then please explain "it". I had to ask one of the guys who formed the calm and coherent portion of the retake movement to go into detail, and we had to take it into the PM section in order to do so.

You want people to "get it"? Then stop with the hipster bull and actually go into detail! It's not that frigging hard!
 

Metalix Knightmare

New member
Sep 27, 2007
831
0
0
00slash00 said:
words i never want to hear again, "mass effect 3 ending." i dont care if you liked it or hated it, i am just so fucking sick of hearing about it. let it go, it really doesnt matter that much.
I have never wanted to hug someone over an internet comment before. I feel sad that I can't.
 

RaikuFA

New member
Jun 12, 2009
4,370
0
0
Metalix Knightmare said:
MacNille said:
Don't forget,this have set gaming back a whole TEN YEARS (yes, Moviebob said that on his twets). His points are fucking stupid. That he doesn't "get it" that we don't like it for being a downer ending. It's because it makes no fucking sense!
Then please explain "it". I had to ask one of the guys who formed the calm and coherent portion of the retake movement to go into detail, and we had to take it into the PM section in order to do so.

You want people to "get it"? Then stop with the hipster bull and actually go into detail! It's not that frigging hard!
It was apparently over them lying that there would be 16 endings. I believe he even mentions that it was wrong and people are still upset he didn't "get it".
 

Freechoice

New member
Dec 6, 2010
1,019
0
0
-Dragmire- said:
Oh yeah, remember the fear of Y2K bug. All digital clocks would go from 99 to 00 which would somehow cause the world's supply of nukes to autofire(targeting every major city, naturally) and destroy us all. Still a better story than the 2012 Mayan apocalypse though.
Y2K was fucking exciting. We had a party and we all rushed to check and see if our computers exploded.

Oh... I miss my desktop.
 

loa

New member
Jan 28, 2012
1,716
0
0
How can you take anything that has a 2 minute intro of pure nonsense and that gets interrupted by an annoying fairy with a squeaky voice which he utilizes for explaining himself in third person needlessly lengthy every 5 minutes seriously?
He should first make his mind up whether he wants to tell us something or wants to bang his toys together.