The problem isn't GOG losing customers. The problem is Australia's inability to fix their broken shitty system to allow for competition with local distributors.CpT_x_Killsteal said:Though I suspect GoG just lost most of it's Australian customers.
The problem isn't GOG losing customers. The problem is Australia's inability to fix their broken shitty system to allow for competition with local distributors.CpT_x_Killsteal said:Though I suspect GoG just lost most of it's Australian customers.
No need for the condescension. I don't appreciate the connotation that I would reply to something without knowing the details either.lacktheknack said:The entire point, if you would bother to read itArakasi said:GG GOG. What happened to putting your foot down? Are you going to start letting in DRM games just to satisfy big publishers too?
What I was trying to say there is less of a slippery slope and more pointing out how they've blatantly violated one of their major tenements, fairness to customers. I know they're trying to bring in some new publishers, but they had a policy of not bending for bullshit, and that's what made them great, now they're showing a lot more flexibility than I, and a lot of other people, would like.lacktheknack said:...is that they're trying to entice SOME publishers to release their products DRM-free. So no, your little slippery-slope fallacy is ridiculous and unfounded.
Ever stop to think that it isn't necessarily knee-jerk but actually thought out? No? I guess its easier to characterise people you disagree with as people who haven't thought out their viewpoint properly.lacktheknack said:OT: The amount of knee-jerk hostility here is both astounding and utterly predictable at the same time.
Pot, kettle.lacktheknack said:...I just despise this kind of "I Refuse To Attempt To See Things From Perspectives I Don't Wish To Acknowledge" "I'm Secretly Worst Than Creationists" reaction in general.
Nonsense. I've acknowledged this rigid "I Cannot Support You Anymore" sudden switch shit for years, and it only gets more ridiculous over time. They announce disheveled pricing for literally one set of games and now we have people wanting all the money they ever spent back, as if gog.com is now the new evil. You know, as if they're still not better in this regard than literally every other major distributor.Arakasi said:No need for the condescension. I don't appreciate the connotation that I would reply to something without knowing the details either.lacktheknack said:The entire point, if you would bother to read itArakasi said:GG GOG. What happened to putting your foot down? Are you going to start letting in DRM games just to satisfy big publishers too?
What I was trying to say there is less of a slippery slope and more pointing out how they've blatantly violated one of their major tenements, fairness to customers. I know they're trying to bring in some new publishers, but they had a policy of not bending for bullshit, and that's what made them great, now they're showing a lot more flexibility than I, and a lot of other people, would like.lacktheknack said:...is that they're trying to entice SOME publishers to release their products DRM-free. So no, your little slippery-slope fallacy is ridiculous and unfounded.
Ever stop to think that it isn't necessarily knee-jerk but actually thought out? No? I guess its easier to characterise people you disagree with as people who haven't thought out their viewpoint properly.lacktheknack said:OT: The amount of knee-jerk hostility here is both astounding and utterly predictable at the same time.
Pot, kettle.lacktheknack said:...I just despise this kind of "I Refuse To Attempt To See Things From Perspectives I Don't Wish To Acknowledge" "I'm Secretly Worst Than Creationists" reaction in general.
Actually it sort of is. GOG is becoming big, and selling out. The original point of GOG was for them to go through the trouble of modifying/emulating old titles so they would run on newer systems and could then be re-released. They were filling a niche which was one occupied by Abandonware sites, but was coming under increased fire, as well as hitting the barrier than when you got beyond a certain point the games were just too big to allow an Abandonware site to put them up for free. GOG getting permission and going "legit" allowed them to charge a small amount of money for their work and justify the cost of hosting those games.Tanis said:It's not really GOG's fault, is it?
I mean, they've bitched about having to do this before.
Their hands being tied thanks to the assholes who actually own the IPs.
Holy shit, I could preorder Thief for $32 on Kinguin, looking back at steam who are asking $45, I know who I am going with in the future. Thank you dear poster, you have saved me good money, I hope karma comes back to reward you.CpT_x_Killsteal said:I can just buy everything on Kinguin for a cheaper price anyway. Though I suspect GoG just lost most of it's Australian customers.
Considering the last 6 years has been the systematic fucking of Australia by all of it's political parties, that's unlikely.Stabinbac said:The problem isn't GOG losing customers. The problem is Australia's inability to fix their broken shitty system to allow for competition with local distributors.CpT_x_Killsteal said:Though I suspect GoG just lost most of it's Australian customers.
Wrong, the problem in Australia is all the publishers bending Aussie over a barrel. This has been going on for a while now and its not just games companys that do this, most of the major software companys do as well (Microsoft, Adobe etc.)Stabinbac said:The problem isn't GOG losing customers. The problem is Australia's inability to fix their broken shitty system to allow for competition with local distributors.CpT_x_Killsteal said:Though I suspect GoG just lost most of it's Australian customers.
its depressing just thinking about it... but the honest truth is that its not just us (Australians) in this situation , new Zealand has it even worse and Greece has it prety bad to. Though that said maybe we all just have terrible people running our nations.CpT_x_Killsteal said:Considering the last 6 years has been the systematic fucking of Australia by all of it's political parties, that's unlikely.Stabinbac said:The problem isn't GOG losing customers. The problem is Australia's inability to fix their broken shitty system to allow for competition with local distributors.CpT_x_Killsteal said:Though I suspect GoG just lost most of it's Australian customers.
Gog is hardly the new evil, but it inches closer with every shitty practice they accept for the sake of adding more games.lacktheknack said:Nonsense. I've acknowledged this rigid "I Cannot Support You Anymore" sudden switch shit for years, and it only gets more ridiculous over time. They announce disheveled pricing for literally one set of games and now we have people wanting all the money they ever spent back, as if gog.com is now the new evil. You know, as if they're still not better in this regard than literally every other major distributor.Arakasi said:No need for the condescension. I don't appreciate the connotation that I would reply to something without knowing the details either.lacktheknack said:The entire point, if you would bother to read itArakasi said:GG GOG. What happened to putting your foot down? Are you going to start letting in DRM games just to satisfy big publishers too?
What I was trying to say there is less of a slippery slope and more pointing out how they've blatantly violated one of their major tenements, fairness to customers. I know they're trying to bring in some new publishers, but they had a policy of not bending for bullshit, and that's what made them great, now they're showing a lot more flexibility than I, and a lot of other people, would like.lacktheknack said:...is that they're trying to entice SOME publishers to release their products DRM-free. So no, your little slippery-slope fallacy is ridiculous and unfounded.
Ever stop to think that it isn't necessarily knee-jerk but actually thought out? No? I guess its easier to characterise people you disagree with as people who haven't thought out their viewpoint properly.lacktheknack said:OT: The amount of knee-jerk hostility here is both astounding and utterly predictable at the same time.
Pot, kettle.lacktheknack said:...I just despise this kind of "I Refuse To Attempt To See Things From Perspectives I Don't Wish To Acknowledge" "I'm Secretly Worst Than Creationists" reaction in general.
Never cared about that.lacktheknack said:Years have passed and I've had it up to here with this fuckery. It never changes. Good Old Games changes to gog.com, the world ends.
Never cared about that.lacktheknack said:...gog.com allows for more prices than $5.99 and $3.99 to allow a greater range of upper-end games into the store, and the world ends.
Do care about that.lacktheknack said:They allow a couple publishers with regional pricing in, and the fucking world ends. Again.
I've never been angry at GOG before now.lacktheknack said:Fuck it. I cannot agree that anyone reacting this way has "thought out" their response, or they wouldn't have come crawling back again after their last temper-tantrums from the last set of changes.
'We' aren't, and never will be, a collective. How about you try treating the people who have valid points separately from those who will tantrum over something that doesn't hurt the consumer.lacktheknack said:The internet denizens can only sit in a puddle of their own tears so many times like petulant children before I stop believing they ever have a valid point behind it. They've neutered themselves and all the weight they had to throw.
Once again, not a collective.lacktheknack said:If you want me to believe that this isn't just ANOTHER "hell-why-not" temper tantrum with no weight beyond being annoying, then people can actually have some balls and STICK with their threats and actually abandon Steam, gog.com, and other distribution services if they're actually doing things you don't like.
They never will, because they never have.
I'm addressing the internet at large, which DID have collective meltdowns over the previous changes. So, by extension that you're just a dude on the internet, it's pretty easy to group you in and take none of it seriously.Arakasi said:snip
yeah gotta say I've never heard this being part of the core beliefs at GoG, just something they've been able to have as a luxury thus far. DRM free has always been their main focus.lacktheknack said:I never recall the "One Price Worldwide" thing ever being a core principle, just one they preferred to keep going if they could.
I gotta say, it'll be utterly baffling if it was EA, seeing how they already have a bunch of stuff on there.gmaverick019 said:yeah gotta say I've never heard this being part of the core beliefs at GoG, just something they've been able to have as a luxury thus far. DRM free has always been their main focus.lacktheknack said:I never recall the "One Price Worldwide" thing ever being a core principle, just one they preferred to keep going if they could.
However, I don't see why you stop using their service all together rather than simply NOT buying those few games from them and buying the non region priced/drm free ones instead.
I'll be interested to see what games they are that are coming and which publisher signed off on it.
A reason given on the GoG Forum:Carsus Tyrell said:Sooo it's for a handful of newer titles and not the entire library? What's the issue then? Just by those games elsewhere. As long as they remain DRM free I'm struggling to care at all.
I'd ask if the tantrum is really necessary, but then I'm addressing "gamers" on the internet, it's like asking if water is wet.
It's anybody's guess at the moment, but why not for EA based on that? The stuff they do have is old, wouldn't put it past EA to insist on region locks for NEW titles. On the other hand, EA dropping DRM? I doubt it.lacktheknack said:I gotta say, it'll be utterly baffling if it was EA, seeing how they already have a bunch of stuff on there.
My money is on 2K, actually.
yeah I just can't see EA putting the new stuff on there, origin is already having a tough enough time as it is, that'd be one hell of a nail in the origin coffin.lacktheknack said:I gotta say, it'll be utterly baffling if it was EA, seeing how they already have a bunch of stuff on there.gmaverick019 said:yeah gotta say I've never heard this being part of the core beliefs at GoG, just something they've been able to have as a luxury thus far. DRM free has always been their main focus.lacktheknack said:I never recall the "One Price Worldwide" thing ever being a core principle, just one they preferred to keep going if they could.
However, I don't see why you stop using their service all together rather than simply NOT buying those few games from them and buying the non region priced/drm free ones instead.
I'll be interested to see what games they are that are coming and which publisher signed off on it.
My money is on 2K, actually.