Poll: Halo:Reach Or Fallout:New Vegas?

[Jezzascmezza]

I'm hoping to get both, but I'll get Halo Reach first, because it looks awesome and it's got multiplayer and firefight, as well as 4 player co-op for the campaign.
New Vegas looks fun, but it's a game I'll really need to watch/read reviews for, as even though I really liked Fallout 3, this one's not being done Bethesda, so I'm a little unsure of whether I'll like it or not.

 

[carpathic]

Fallout New Vegas. I suspect things about the game will frustrate me immensly - ie. the new weight of ammo being taken into consideration on some play levels etc...but I just love a good post-apocalyptia

Halo-Reach...meh. Just not into it.

 

[Blights]

Halo: Reach looks amazing, not too much of a Fallout fan myself, it's just really strange, it's an FPS just with a skill attached that helps you shoot better.

 

[carpathic]

New Vegas by far.

It actually has a plot. Not only that but quite a good one. On top of all that it doesn't have stupid DRM and is said to be highly moddable by the dev team themselves.

Fallout New Vegas. I suspect things about the game will frustrate me immensly - ie. the new weight of ammo being taken into consideration on some play levels etc...but I just love a good post-apocalyptia

Halo-Reach...meh. Just not into it.

Ammo/medical supplies/whatever only has weight if you enable hardcore mode. IF you don't play on Hardcore ammo/meds/drugs don't take up weight just as they did in FO3.

Yep, which is why I said "On certain play levels".

I am pretty excited about FO-NV...Just don't think I'll bother with hardcore mode. I don't want a game to be "real" just fun!

 

[Nomanslander]

There's 50 other shooters coming out this year with regenerating health and limited weapons capacity.

One Fallout.

 

[EboMan7x]

Get vegas. Also "prequel" is only used to describe something that takes place chronologically before, but was made after... I think.

 

[SNIPERFOX ft. Harry P.Ness]

if you want a good ammount of variety, new vegas.

if you want a doi hoi hoi whizz bang shooty fun SPEISS MEHRINEZ game, go for halo

 

[Doom moose]

never been a fan of the halo series played almost all of them at friends houses but not that great so obviously having thought fallout 3 was brilliant i have to vote for new vagas

 

[Bluesclues]

Halo: Reach looks amazing, not too much of a Fallout fan myself, it's just really strange, it's an FPS just with a skill attached that helps you shoot better.

Actually that's the RPG element of the game. Which is why it's considered an RPG.




OT: I'll have to go with FO:NV, but I think because Bethesda isn't making it, researching it first might be a good idea. In your case I think I'll have to agree with the idea of getting Reach first and watching New Vegas.

 

[PunkRex]

Guy, your basically asking two of the biggest fan bases in gaming to state which side their on, which can lead to alot of hating. Still its nice to see this page is not just people ripping on each other, gives me hope for the gaming community.

I would say New Vegas as I have only played Fallout 3 but it blew me away. Halo's fine but all it does is remind me how much more of a grim place the world is without TimeSplitters. Still, 4 to look forward to hopefully, please God.

Just get both, you would obviously enjoy them and their different enough to not get repetitive, just mug an old lady for her purse if you need extra money.

 

[tlozoot]

I'd get Reach over NV, though that's just me. I was a long time player of Halo 3s multiplayer, and Reach looks like the definitive Halo game.

I didn't love Fallout 3 like alot of other people. I loved Oblivion, but for some reason I didn't enjoy Fallout as much. I still liked it, and I'll still play New Vegas.

 

[Flippincrazy]

Funnily enough, I found Halo's campaign and offline multiplayer much more satisfying than the actual online matchmaking tihngs mawozzit.

OT: I really don't know what it was about Fallout 3, but I found it pretty interesting for the first four hours...and after that meh. It got really boring and repetitive, at least I found Halo 3 exciting all the way through, even if it has a shorter campaign. But yeah, I'm definitely going to get Reach over Las Vegas, purely because playing co-op on those games always is ridiculous fun. Haven't played a good co-op game since L4D2.

 

[The Righteous One]

Fallout New Vegas for sure. Never got into multi-player shooters and never Halo. Fallout 3 was okay and if New Vegas does it the same way maybe a better main story line it would be great.

 

[Buizel91]

Both

Halo cause then i will have all the Halo games and play on probably one of the best multiplayer games to come out this year.

Fallout New Vegas because i liked fallout 3 and this just fallout 3 with better game play mechanics, new weapons, upgraded graphics, and a brand new world to explore =D.

 

[Xyliss]

I've never liked the Halo series, and don't think it deserves the praise it got. But being a lover of Fallout 3 and quite excited about New Vega I'm going to have to choose that

 

[tehbeard]

Really should have put a both option in the poll.

I would go for reach, on the basis that the beta was pretty fun, and I have yet to upgrade my PC to handle games like F:NV.

 

[Redratson]

Both, I can't really make a decision between the 2. I love the fallout series, but after playing the Reach beta I somewhat enjoyed it a little more than usually.