Seanchaidh said:
Getting shot when running at someone with a gun therefore falls into the category of possible (as well as probable) because it can fail to happen that you would be shot.
Well hey, if you want to take that kind of chance because there's a vanishingly small probability that it might work, you go right ahead.
Oh, I love playing games of "let's repeat ourselves verbatim!" Ok, here I go: The only reasonable course of action is to treat the example as it is stated and infer nothing from the options because their success is not guaranteed.
It is easy to infer that the gunman must be in front of you, since disarming is presented as an option.
It doesn't matter where he is, you can still try to disarm him. It just isn't very clever if he isn't right in front of you.
You can't disarm him, he is not within range. Or do you have rubber arms?
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Let me say this more plainly: I'm
not going to take ownership of your failed logic. It's your problem, and you're the one who's going to have to deal with it. So cowboy the fuck up and take some responsibility for your nonsense.