After seeing the huge about of controversy that minecraft has generated throughout the march mayhem, i think one of the main problems is that people vote differently.
You can either vote based on what the developer has created over all.. (i.e. voting for nintendo because of super mario on the nes etc.).
Or you can vote based on what the developer has released recently and the quality of that.
Now for me personally, because march mayhem happens annually, I vote on what was released in the last year, (otherwise the big names like Nintendo will always win, because no one can trump over 2 decades of game releases).
Now I think that this is what is causing all the controversy with minecraft, it's the people who vote based on what the developer has released overall against the people who have voted in the last year.
Now it's arguable that if you only concentrate on the last year, that Mojang would beat Nintendo based on popularity and just the way it took off. But you could also argue that Nintendo deserve the title due to the large quantity of games that they have released, and also that they deserve to win based on their large time in the industry.
So, how did you vote for the march mayhem, was it based on the last year or based on the developer as a whole, and what's your take on the whole minecraft fiasco?
(Note: I'm trying to keep this thread as biased free as possible, because i've seen a lot of threads either for or against minecraft and they seem to cause a lot of rage amongst the posters, so I'm trying to make this as neutral as possible).
You can either vote based on what the developer has created over all.. (i.e. voting for nintendo because of super mario on the nes etc.).
Or you can vote based on what the developer has released recently and the quality of that.
Now for me personally, because march mayhem happens annually, I vote on what was released in the last year, (otherwise the big names like Nintendo will always win, because no one can trump over 2 decades of game releases).
Now I think that this is what is causing all the controversy with minecraft, it's the people who vote based on what the developer has released overall against the people who have voted in the last year.
Now it's arguable that if you only concentrate on the last year, that Mojang would beat Nintendo based on popularity and just the way it took off. But you could also argue that Nintendo deserve the title due to the large quantity of games that they have released, and also that they deserve to win based on their large time in the industry.
So, how did you vote for the march mayhem, was it based on the last year or based on the developer as a whole, and what's your take on the whole minecraft fiasco?
(Note: I'm trying to keep this thread as biased free as possible, because i've seen a lot of threads either for or against minecraft and they seem to cause a lot of rage amongst the posters, so I'm trying to make this as neutral as possible).