Poll: If games cost $69.99 next gen?

[Ken_J]

Yes. I would say no and many people will say no and mean it but when push come to shove we will buy games for 70 bucks.

 

[afroebob]

I barely buy anything not on a Steam Sale so sure, at 75% off thats not a huge difference, especially considering the price probably already dropped to $40 before hand.

 

[SonOfVoorhees]

Only if it was a game i really, and i mean really wanted. An even then it would depend on how long it would take to complete. At the moment about 90% of the games i get are rented via lovefilm. If sony/ms stopped places rented there next gen games then i just wouldnt buy a next gen console. It wouldnt be worth the money for me.

 

[Rasor]

It's been said many times, but another Aussie here would be stoked to get $70 release day games.
This 80% mark up for the same product is silly, it feels like I'm buying Apple products.

 

[Doom972]

I'll just wait for a Steam sale. There's no way I'll buy a new PC game for more than $50 (Which I would only do if I'm really excited about that game), unless I want the collector's edition of that game (Which has only happened twice in my life).

I really wish more people would do this, so that we can get our games at a fair price on release day.

 

[drzoidbergmd]

The game better be damn good for me to spend enough for 2-10 other games with, all I'm sayin.

 

[Jamous]

Then games would start selling even worse than they currently do.

 

[prowll]

Of course. Same as everyone else on this board, despite protestations. The problem is, you're asking the wrong question. The real question is, how MANY games. I expect that I'll drop 1-2 of my yearly limit. Instead of 6 awesome games, I'll get 4.

 

[Adrian Neyland]

I don't usually buy games right off the bat, I usually wait a bit, and the price tends to dwindle, I'm not really compelled to constantly be up to date with the latest and greatest

 

[Candidus]

I wouldn't buy as many, and I wouldn't buy-on-release unless I really cared about the studio, but I'd still buy games at a higher price point. I'll never buy used, so it'd hit me quite hard, but I wouldn't complain about the injustice of it all.

I buy DVDs for £12,99 that entertain me for two hours.
Most games entertain me for 24 hours minimum.

Even at £40,00 it's not a bad deal comparatively.

 

[theultimateend]

It would barely affect me at all.

Games drop in price so quickly now and there are SO many of them to chose from that unless I MUST HAVE IT NOWZ! (maybe once a year), I don't ever buy at full price. So they can do what they want with the price for I will just continue waiting to buy the game until it gets to a price that I find reasonable.

So I suppose "Other" would be my choice since I wouldn't say Yes or No because I don't care. I also don't buy used games all that often so that wouldn't matter and I don't think we need to overthrow the gaming government because the prices of our games have gone up

Exactly how I feel. I almost never buy anything for maximum price.

I get it when I want it and usually by then its 20-30 bucks tops.

 

[loa]

I don't even buy games for the 60$ price.

 

[CyanideSandwich]

Yeah, but Australians also earn about 40% more in their jobs than their American counterparts.

It's not just games that cost more here, it's pretty much everything. Electronics and media just get the spotlight because it has the highest margin. I'm not saying it balances out, but the price difference shouldn't be as much as it is, even considering the wage differences.

OT: I'm assuming you mean "What if prices go up?". In that case, unless quality goes up (not talking about graphics), then I'm switching to PC or just doing the 5-year lag option.

 

[lechat]

Yeah, but Australians also earn about 40% more in their jobs than their American counterparts.

It's not just games that cost more here, it's pretty much everything. Electronics and media just get the spotlight because it has the highest margin. I'm not saying it balances out, but the price difference shouldn't be as much as it is, even considering the wage differences.

OT: I'm assuming you mean "What if prices go up?". In that case, unless quality goes up (not talking about graphics), then I'm switching to PC or just doing the 5-year lag option.

it's a throw back to the days when it took 3 months to ship something here via boat and apparently internet data works like boats (not pipes)

so how bad is it?
http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/downloads-its-cheaper-to-pay-a-wage-fly-to-the-us-and-back-twice-20120718-229in.html

"In Australia you pay, on average, 52 per cent more than an American consumer will for the same 50 top iTunes songs," says Choice head of campaigns, Matt Levey.

"A selection of 44 popular home and business software products were, on average, 34 per cent more expensive in Australia than the US."

but more importantly

Mr Levey said in its research Choice discovered one Microsoft software development product that was more than $8500 cheaper in the US.

"It would be cheaper to pay someone's wage and fly them to the US and back twice, getting them to buy the software while they're there,? he said.

same goes for some high end adobe software. it would literally be cheaper for me to fly to the U.S than to buy it in a store here, NVM the fact that i could instead fly to indonesia for a shit load less and buy a pirated version... or you know just download one.
seriously hard to hold an anti piracy view when every time you whip out your credit card you are getting screwed

 

[idarkphoenixi]

They'll probably try pulling this off. I mean, if you can charge more as a standard and get away with it why wouldn't you. They do it now with certain AAA games for Christs sake (Pretty much every CoD game for instance is £5 more than normal at launch. why? Just because)

Hopefully gamers will actually show that there are certain lines you can't cross, who knows. There's no way this could happen with PC that's for sure.

 

[Al-Bundy-da-G]

Oh noes not ten more dollars, how will we ever be able to afford the massive increase in the price of a triple A game?

 

[DoctorImpossible]

I'll keep buying the majority of games used*, and pick up new ones from trusted companies as my funds allow.

*from reputable eBay sellers and local shops, but not Gamestop. Never Gamestop.

 

[AVeryClassyCat]

I haven't bought a new AAA game in 5 years, and a shift up in price will just mean that trend will continue. I appreciate that prices aren't as outrageous here as elsewhere, and that maybe they are low compared to other times but I can't bet $60 on hoping that a new game isn't a complete pile of ass when that could easily go toward multiple used titles or multiple indie titles. I guess as a PC gamer for the most part I just don't want to part with that much money at once on something I'm guaranteed to be unable to return barring some really limited circumstances. As for console, I don't plan on buying any of the new ones so the price jump there isn't an issue for me.

I can wait for prices to go down, and if the industry makes moves to make that not a viable option then I can definitely just refocus to continue supporting indie titles.

 

[J Tyran]

Remember to add DLC and microtransactions to that $70.

No need to add that at all, not unless you choose to add it. Why bother paying for it if you dont want too? Most of the time a good game is still a perfectly decent experience without it, there are exceptions of course but most of the time you miss almost nothing. Its only a problem when people have some kind of 100% collection impulse and feel they need all the pokemons or something.

You claim its a scam, sure it could be considered so and just like most scams it only works when people willingly step into it.

 

[Nazulu]

It would have to be a really good game. That's all I have to say.