AndyFromMonday said:
No. I'm saying that violence will lead only to more violence.
Blatantly and provably untrue.
That violence is never the answer and that if you're unable to face the hardships of raising a child without the use of violence then you should ask yourself why you became a parent in the first place.
Most parents ask themselves that every time something goes wrong.
"What could we have done better?"
What they don't do is pick on one insignificant part of the upbringing and blame it squarely on that.
That's what the tabloids do. Because if your "violence creates violence" spiel exists, how come that even Dr Benjamin Spock said that spanking is
usually not the case?
You are basing your entire philosophy on what your family did, and then putting it across as the only way to live. The level of egotism there is extraordinary, and strictly offensive to any of us that have had parents who have spanked us in the past.
As I'm sure you can ascertain, in the past, children were treated more poorly. Had your spiel been truthful we would have grown more violent as a species. We have provably grown less violent and more caring, and how? I won't say spanking is the cause, but there's a strong correlation that it could be beneficial or neutral - if used in moderation.
Quick test for you: As you turn around, your child is pulling at a towel. On top of the bench, on this towel, is a cup of boiling water that you put down a minute ago.
You have literally seconds to act. Do you:
A) Spring across, pull the child/cup away and admonish a sharp shock so that he knows it's dangerous (even though he wasn't truly in the wrong)
B) Spring across, pull the child/cup away (scaring the child) and then lie to say that it's Daddies fault.
C) Pause to consider your options and then take the child to hospital with third degree burns.
Quick Poll Check: Yes leads all other options combined.