Poll: Indefinite survival during a zombie apocalypse: Logical?

Recommended Videos

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
Even assuming the numbers in your nightmare scenario are correct, there are a few key things that stand in the way of the zombie overlords. First, in spite of what every zombie movie in the universe has told you, a zombie cannot be any more diffult to kill than the host was in life. In order to survive, in order to function at any level the human body requires a beating heart, a supply of blood, a working immune system (of some kind), and a fairly regular intake of fuel. Since zombies appear to lack anything really resembling intelligence, and they are cursed with the same physical frailties of the human frame, it can be safely assumed that most zombies simply wouldn't live for very long once the most readily accessible food supplies run out. Unfortunately for the survivors, the average person (American at least) no longer possesses any real survival skills and probably won't fare much better. Long term survival chances without power rapidly dwindle as readily accessible food and water sources expire.

Of course, if the breed of zombies you face happen to be of the kind seen in movies (immune to all trauma/disease/lack of food but oddly vulnerable to an icepick through the eye) then all known laws and rules of biology have been thrown out the window anyway. However, under this scenario it's just as likely that any survivors would be granted some sort of superhuman powers as well.
 

TwistedEllipses

New member
Nov 18, 2008
2,041
0
0
Flying-Emu said:
Even escaping to a deserted island or building some sort of super fortress wouldn't succeed (see Land of the Dead), because the zombies would eventually overrun it. Either that, or supplies would run out, and the survivors would die from hunger or disease. There's also the question of reproduction.
Can we not include land of the dead? They were using tools - that's cheating! also you can't walk on the sea floor with out an anti-floatation device (heavy weight) and zombies would be more likely to thrash about than actually be able to swim, so an island still seems the best bet.
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
Flying-Emu said:
Before this gets started, let me say this is a purely hypothetical question.

In the event of a zombie invasion, would it be possible to survive indefinitely against such odds?

To explain, let's say there are roughly 6 billion people in the world. 75% are turned by airborne, 24% turned by bite or devoured. 1% survives immune to both contact and airborne strain.

Even escaping to a deserted island or building some sort of super fortress wouldn't succeed (see Land of the Dead), because the zombies would eventually overrun it. Either that, or supplies would run out, and the survivors would die from hunger or disease. There's also the question of reproduction.

What I'm saying is that, logically, it would be impossible to "ride out" a zombie apocalypse. You'd either turn or be eaten, or die of starvation and disease.
(You got your math right! =D)
Get outta my head! I was gonna make a thread about, "Living with Zeds."

If Half-Life teaches us anything, then we can. As for living indefinitely, I have to say, "Kashwak No Fo."
The zombies would eventually starve, freeze, or just plain die.
 

Flying-Emu

New member
Oct 30, 2008
5,367
0
0
carnkhan4 said:
Flying-Emu said:
Even escaping to a deserted island or building some sort of super fortress wouldn't succeed (see Land of the Dead), because the zombies would eventually overrun it. Either that, or supplies would run out, and the survivors would die from hunger or disease. There's also the question of reproduction.
Can we not include land of the dead? They were using tools - that's cheating! also you can't walk on the sea floor with out an anti-floatation device (heavy weight) and zombies would be more likely to thrash about than actually be able to swim, so an island still seems the best bet.
Note the lack of edible material that would be found on a 'deserted island', especially since said survivors would LIKELY not be trained in agriculture, or possibly even fishing.
 

ThePlasmatizer

New member
Sep 2, 2008
1,261
0
0
Erana said:
The zombies would eventually starve, freeze, or just plain die.
I would have used the word deteriorate but same thing.

I think somewhere static like a fortress, island or building wouldn't work,
maybe a bunker though if it was entirely sealed.

I think the best plan of action would be something like a battleship or submarine, something that can keep moving.

Granted you would need to stop off every so often to gather supplies and resources but while you are travelling you are relatively safe.
Another advantage is that sections of the ship can be sealed off so in the event of the outbreak you could regroup and kill off the infected.
 

TwistedEllipses

New member
Nov 18, 2008
2,041
0
0
Flying-Emu said:
carnkhan4 said:
Flying-Emu said:
Even escaping to a deserted island or building some sort of super fortress wouldn't succeed (see Land of the Dead), because the zombies would eventually overrun it. Either that, or supplies would run out, and the survivors would die from hunger or disease. There's also the question of reproduction.
Can we not include land of the dead? They were using tools - that's cheating! also you can't walk on the sea floor with out an anti-floatation device (heavy weight) and zombies would be more likely to thrash about than actually be able to swim, so an island still seems the best bet.
Note the lack of edible material that would be found on a 'deserted island', especially since said survivors would LIKELY not be trained in agriculture, or possibly even fishing.
Tropical islands actually tend to have an abundance of life, just as long as you pick one large enough and with fresh water. Some islands already have small communities that are so isolated they wouldn't be affected, that may already have the skills needed. Also if you don't know how to fish and farm, there's trial and error and the chance to start learning now!
 

Pirce

New member
Nov 5, 2008
152
0
0
Make an outpost in the Arctic, zombies have no body heat and so would freeze in the low temperatures thus rendering them harmless.
 

Soulreaverm

New member
Jan 15, 2009
123
0
0
I think survival would definitely be possible with some sort of island fortress. The hard part is getting to the island fortress. Realistically, the kind of zombie holocaust which is most likely to occur is the 28 Days Later rage virus type. A virus that makes living people act like zombies makes far more sense than a virus/cosmic radiation/voodoo magic/brain parasite that reanimates dead flesh. On the one hand, that makes them far easier to kill, as it wouldn't be necessary to target the head. On the other hand, if they aren't dead, they can move fast, which means they attack fast and spread fast. Survival against a horde of insane fast zombies for longer than a few days would be extremely difficult. If you manage to last a few weeks, by which point you should have found weapons, food and water, a defensible position and other people, then you can probably keep going until the zombies die off.

If you are already living on an island fortress, with a handy freshwater spring and established agriculture, you'll probably be fine. Although if zombie movies teach us anything, it's that eventually someone is going to do something stupid and get everyone eaten.
 

bioVOLTAGE

New member
Dec 28, 2008
60
0
0
Zeeky_Santos said:
bioVOLTAGE said:
I bought a guide for this situation a few years ago, and it gives a few tips. I totaly think that it would be possible if you plan it right. Besides, you don't have to wait forever. The zombies are dead and decomposing, albeit at a slower rate. They can't heal from the little things like scrapes and what nots. If you wait a few years, a decade at most, most of them would be rendered harmless.
you actually paid for advice on a zombie apocalypse?
Yeah I did. It was a good survival guide. I got it after a friend of mine kept having a dream about zombies attacking him at work. It was to comfort him in that if they did come for him, we would be ready, but most of all, I got it for a joke.
 

Silver

New member
Jun 17, 2008
1,142
0
0
C Lion said:
So what you're saying here, if I may boil it down, is that everyone will survive because you say so. Trust me, you can't ignore the human element. In fact, it's the most important part. Someone is going to do something stupid. Always. Besides, your barricades/doors/whatever separates you and them won't last forever, and more and more zombies will surround you every day with all the commotion(and don't say they'll never know you're in there, they will, especially after a year). Salvage runs would become extremely dangerous, escape would be impossible. In fact, after about a week of zombies wandering to your shelter, you probably wouldn't make it back in.
EDIT: BTW, watching your friends eaten alive and then rising to come eat you does not, in fact, make you stronger.
No. I never said that everyone will survive. Actually, I said the exact opposite. It was sort of my point.

I also said that salvage runs would be unnecessary.

The reason people would survive is because in the real world, there's this thing called physics. Natural laws and all that jazz. Gravity is one of them. Zombies in the real world can't fly, and they don't float up into the air.

Another one of those pesky annoying laws that get into the way of zombie fiction takes a look at energy. Or there's several such laws actually. One of them states that without energy you can't move. That goes for zombies as well, unless they have an external energy source, like say, food, for instance, they won't be able to move. They'll die. (Or go completely inert, at least)

The other one touches on momentum and force, and mass, and all that jazz, and it's relevant because it's fairly easy to construct a barrier that a human can't break through, no matter what. A barrier that several generations of humans couldn't break through, no matter their number. (Unless of course, they have tools for it, but zombies are usually portrayed as without them.)

One example would be an iron wall, say, a metre thick. They can't get through that. Those walls don't pop up out of nowhere, of course, which is a bit annoying. However, stone and wood work almost equally well, you just need more of it.

Of course, zombies could always pile up on top of each other, and get over your wall. That's going to be a problem. There are ways around that though. You could build layered walls, and add a moat between them, that way you have a nice way of flushing out the zombies as they get closer.


But the real thing is that zombies in real life wouldn't be as dangerous as they are in movies, AND even more importantly, it's only the first few days that are really dangerous. After that our species will have recovered from the initial schock, and we will be able to deal with the situation. The human species is pretty darn good at that, as evidenced by us surviving as long as we have. We can adapt any enviroment to fit us, we can even survive in fucking space.

You underestimate humanity as a whole. While I'm often guilty myself of claiming human stupidity on a lot of things, while I despise what society has become, while I think that most of humanity could probably do with a bullet in their head, and that the only way to salvage what our species has become is probably a clean start, in a situation such as this hypothetical one, it's just not true.

Humanity can, and will, overcome almost any obstacle nature, or anything else could throw our way. The only way that zombies could ever pose a threat to the species is if they had an intelligence co-ordinating them from behind, and keeping them supplied and fed. Other than that it's only the initial schock that's dangerous, at all.


You also state that zombies would find my fort. That's highly unlikely, but let's say they're magical. They're still zombies, and they're still walking, and there's a hell of a lot of land to cross, so even if they magically know where my forts are, it takes them quite a while to get there. We get plenty of advance warning. We could probably kill all zombies coming our way, or we could reinforce our defences and pick them off slowly. 100 zombies for everyone of us isn't that many. Say 9/10 of us die. That's a thousand zombies per individual. We could still probably kill those zombies, but even if we don't, there are many places in the world where zombies couldn't survive, and where we could. Given that we have access to basic technology, we can easily construct bases, or hideouts zombies can't reach. Not even going to vehicles, we can use rope to climb up inaccesible places. We can build obstacles we can easily traverse.

Hell, we could just pick a place zombies naturally can't survive in, boil them in a desert, or move to the thundra.



Now if you state that these are zombies, and they can only be killed through the brain, they don't need food, and none of these laws apply to them, then I'm going to throw a fireball into the horde of zombies, then I'll fly to America, pick up a nuke or two, and juggle them over the zombies head, before accidently dropping them, eliminating the zombie horde. The radiation will give me super powers, and cause edible pink flowers to grow out of every rock.

You know why? Because then we're not in this world anymore, and the laws of physics decided to leave.


Sorry, this has gotten way too long, and I'm just rambling. The fact is that it's almost physically impossible for zombies to wipe out the human species. Sure, they can do a hell of a lot of damage, perhaps they could even wipe out most of our species (highly, highly doubtful). Given every possible advantage they might bring us down to a million people.

The thing though is that zombies physically can't traverse every obstacle. Zombies need a source of energy. Zombies die underwater. Zombies have a limited mass, and can't bring more force than that mass allows to bear. We can grow our own food. We can find what we need to survive. We can cooperate, if we need to, one way or another. For one person to ensure the destruction of everyone that person would have to actively try to do it, and probably plan for a while before doing it (sort of like in the movies, where it's always an illogicaly bad time that someone breaks down, and they do so in the one way that would allow zombies to kill everyone).
 

Sir Ollie

The Emperor's Finest
Jan 14, 2009
2,022
0
41
I don't know lug a battleship sail to the nearest oil derrick and live there!, since i doubt zombies can swim thank you max brooks and your guide
 

Ace of Spades

New member
Jul 12, 2008
3,303
0
0
Improbable. Something would kill you eventually. You'd either turn into a zombie, be killed by a zombie, die of starvation, or maybe you'd just trip and fall on a fork.
 

Ravenbom

New member
Oct 24, 2008
355
0
0
Break said:
Ravenbom said:
It'd be hard to organize the random 1% that are immune. They'd be all spread out in geographically separate places.
Why is the 1% immunity random?

I don't know, that's the numbers we got in the first post of this subject.
As for why I think it would be random, well, out of the whole world, that's just too small a percentage of the population, especially with the rate of globalization that we have now, with people spread across the world, to have that small percentage of immunity to be anything other than random.

If it makes you feel better, its probably not entirely random. It would be restricted to healthy people, most likely 18-35, with no preexisting immuno-deficiencies.
The first post also specified it was a virus, not a bacteria, so anti-biotics would never be able to kill it.
The only way it could really spread this fast, as to cover the whole world, is if it is not so virulent that it turns it's host right away. Most sicknesses make you most virulent when you're still feeling well, so as to best pass on the virus before you're movements are restricted.



Anyways, it would never happen because in order to infect 6 billion people, the pathogen would undergo many mutations and would probably be totally different by the time it finished infecting people.
Think about it, if a virus can undergo 1000 generations in one host, then than means 6 trillion generations for 6 billion people. Humans will be radically different in 6 trillion generations, how different do you think the virus would be?
There are just simply too many people to infect in the world with one disease that is naturally passed on, unless its chemical warfare, in which case, the 1% immunity (going back to the first post) should be randomly distributed.

So, probably one 1 of every 5 people left will be ethnically Chinese, about 1 out of 7 Indian, and 1 of 9 African. Only about 4.5% of people left will be American, so, learn Chinese and buy a shotgun if you're worried about long term survival in this particular zombie apocalypse.
 

NeedAUserName

New member
Aug 7, 2008
3,803
0
0
Somewhere like Britain that has very little contact with its surrounding countries, wall it off, kill the zombies already inside. Would take a long time, but possible. Also make the main base somewhere in the north, no one likes the cold, not even Zombies.
 

ChocoFace

New member
Nov 19, 2008
1,409
0
0
MaxTheReaper said:
Step A: Build huge walled fortress on top of fertile farmland, with stream nearby.
And that's your problem right there. I'm sure the zombies will have gotten to you/died out by the time you finish that huge walled fortress
 

RheynbowDash

New member
Jan 26, 2009
1,386
0
0
this is a dodgy subject, cause everyone has their own opinion about what to do. every situation is gonna be different, and people are gonna react differently. the best thing to do is to appoint a leader and have them make the decisions about food, etc.
 

Jursa

New member
Oct 11, 2008
924
0
0
As long as people travel in packs then it's totally possible... Take over a town, create walls and slowly exterminate the entire population bullet by bullet...
 

GCM

New member
Sep 2, 2008
131
0
0
I say possible, but questions!

Is this like Left 4 Dead? Where those who are immune are thinly spread, but can gather together and work to move on?

Is entirely possible, of course, considering all the processed junk available, which people could survive on until a place is built to farm food.

Of course, there is the matter of Tanks. =D