Oh god, not more feels.Daystar Clarion said:The feels?
Oh god...
![]()
Keep that hair short...
![]()
Now there's gonna be two grown men crying in the corner and for once it's not going to be about the moderation here.
[sup]Heyoooooooooooooooooooo.[/sup]
Oh god, not more feels.Daystar Clarion said:The feels?
Oh god...
![]()
Keep that hair short...
![]()
Circlejerk?Daystar Clarion said:
Okay that's ridiculous. I mean if she was really trying to hurt someone or what have you then fine. But "oh noes, she called me a CRYBABY" and she gets banned? That's pretty bullshit.Legion said:This.Saviordd1 said:Wait, Vault got banned? What the hell for?
Bearing in mind under the rules system, she was on a "final warning" for quite some time. A lot of people (I imagine you must have seen the avatars) are not happy with it, but I haven't heard of any appeal attempt on her part.
See I look at posts like these and wonder how in the world they aren't considered low content. Is it because the off-topic conversation started on-topic and it's allowed to trickle down?Sassafrass said:Circlejerk?
![]()
Lets begin.
Off topic, thread derailment, posting memes, not enough fear, quote pyramids, inverted smilies, crude humor...Easton Dark said:See I look at posts like these and wonder how in the world they aren't considered low content. Is it because the off-topic conversation started on-topic and it's allowed to trickle down?Sassafrass said:Circlejerk?
![]()
Lets begin.
Not judging, now I'm seriously curious. I mean look, it's 3 words.
It's hard to stay active in forums when they soak up all your browsing time with moderation issues (chewing through the mod queue, reading threads for context, maybe reading some other threads out of personal interest... Then realizing you've already spent several hours on the forums today...)Tony said:I find the moderation here pretty cool, though I do see bits of overkill. And I do kinda wish the mods interacted with the community a bit more.
If you see a post requires attention, report it! We can't do our jobs if nobody reports posts that break the forum rules!Azaraxzealot said:Dear GOD, yes.
Because I will see so many people get away with the most condescending, inflammatory, and just outright insulting posts and yet they won't get so much as a warning while benign posts or parody posts or posts from people who actually back up what they're saying without insulting anyone get some long-term people who just make this forum a better place banned
How along ago did this happen? Remember that things are a lot different from a few years ago. New mods, new community manager etc. If it is still an issue then please feel free to PM me your concerns.I've had people send me inflammatory messages and the mods did NOTHING when I sent them copies of the messages. They even said they would do nothing![]()
From the Code of Conduct;It's also extremely hypocritical how people are modded sometimes. There are more than a few contributors to the escapist (in terms of producing videos and articles) who have admitted to piracy and even encouraged (though indirectly) it. Yet if someone even brings it up as something they've ever done or wanted to do at all then they immediately get a mark against them on the forum health meter![]()
I don't get it.
Why can they say it but we can't?
This is mostly true, but dude, you've got 811 posts after seven years. Most people blow through that many in their first six months, which makes not getting a warning in that time a lot less impressiveCyberAkuma said:I've been a member of the Escapist for almost 7 years.
I have never once recieved a warning - much less a ban.
In fact, I have N-E-V-E-R recieved a warning nor a ban anywhere.
You are speaking as if not getting a warning is an impossible feat - it is NOT.
Just don't be a dick. It is really astonishingly simple.
Not visiting =/= banned.Owyn_Merrilin said:Heck, pre-2011 join dates are getting rare. Kind of says something about the rate at which people are banned, doesn't it?
Context is everything.Easton Dark said:See I look at posts like these and wonder how in the world they aren't considered low content. Is it because the off-topic conversation started on-topic and it's allowed to trickle down?Sassafrass said:Circlejerk?
![]()
Lets begin.
Not judging, now I'm seriously curious. I mean look, it's 3 words.
If that were really true, then your post would be enough to get a warning, wouldn't it?Balberoth said:I've not seen a single post where somebody was suspended or banned that was actually justified.
Not one.
I see people getting warned and banned for using slightly impolite language, but only when they are disagreeing with the prevailing opinion in the thread, if they are agreeing then it's fine.
The opinion I have seen on other forums is that The Escapist forums are a circlejerk, and from what I have seen so far I certainly agree.
It's definitely not a place to discuss topics, because if you are found to be disagreeing with the popular opinion then it's only a matter of time before somebody finds something to ban you for.