Poll: Intelligence or Creativity

Recommended Videos

Slenn

Cosplaying Nuclear Physicist
Nov 19, 2009
15,782
0
0
I don't particularly like the dichotomy of creativity and intelligence that's set up here. Both of those things are required for you to be scientist or, in general, for a person to understand the world around him or her. Intelligence to investigate and observe the world, and creativity to come up with theories and hypotheses.
 

Furious Styles

New member
Jul 10, 2010
1,162
0
0
not to be arrogant, but I'm sort of both. I'm at a top UK university studying law (so I'm pretty smart), can draw (although am not some sort of artistic genius) and am a good creative writer.

If I had to chose one to be great at (I'm pretty good in both but a bit of a jack of all trades), however, I'd go for creativity. I'd rather be rich and respected for something artistic, like a novel or for art, than for something intellectual, like computer programming or science/maths.

I'd rather be Bob Dylan than Albert Einstein
 

SoranMBane

New member
May 24, 2009
1,178
0
0
Honestly, I don't think you can effectively have one without the other. If you're intelligent but uncreative, you might be a walking encyclopedia in your field, but you'll never be able to use your knowledge to contribute anything of real worth. If you're creative but not very smart, your work might be beautiful or unique in some way, but it'll lack the philosophical depth that makes art so immensely valuable. But I suppose if I had to choose, being creative and stupid would be a preferable life to being intelligent and having nothing productive to channel all that knowledge into, while creating high quality schlock is probably better than contributing nothing at all.

TL;DR I begrudgingly throw my vote in for "creativity." :p
 

Conza

New member
Nov 7, 2010
951
0
0
I'd like to think I had a decent serving of both, but if I had to lose one, it'd be intelligence, it just makes me more deserning about the world, with less of it, ignorance wouold be bliss! And creativity is more important, because all you need is a dab of intelligence, with a bunch of creativity to make something good.
 

-Drifter-

New member
Jun 9, 2009
2,521
0
0
Art is my passion, but I find myself struggling to produce anything creative or particularly good these days. Besides, I'm not that smart as is anyway. I'll take creativity.
 

Chameliondude

New member
Jul 21, 2009
212
0
0
Kind of a false dichotomy, to be truly brilliant you must have both, beauty and functionality is why we remember the great minds of our time, General relativity, landing on the moon, the bouncing bomb, all of them fueled by both incredible scientific reasoning but impossible without the genius creative minds involved.
 

Murray Kitson

New member
Mar 8, 2011
56
0
0
fact is guys, these two go hand in hand. art is truly a science. even creative writing is boiled down to simple equations. the only writers who do not have a high intellect never really get published. take tom clancy. he focused his education in the military aspect of the world and has made a career creatively writing stories that go with what he knows. remember also, the writer needs to possess every bit of knowledge that is in their books. this is accumulated from characters and other input from the story.

thats novel writing out of the way, lets look at video game writing. most think writers just pop in and start writing story lines and dialog. but in reality, most need to know how to code the dialog so the programmers don't have to rewrite everything, just copy and paste the file created by the writers into the game itself. This saves countless hours.

television and movie writing also follows a code. when you learn about screen writing, you find that a film is broken into different parts and each of these is broken into parts also. this is the reason we have predictability in films and television these days. the only films that stand out are those who are splendidly written or break this code in a way that the audience is pulled in through curiosity. generally, their just put off by the strange workings.

I am not saying that those who have creativity are intuitively smart, or that an intellectual person can write a novel. but a high basic balance is best for production.
 

Ace of Spades

New member
Jul 12, 2008
3,303
0
0
This has been the internal struggle in me for the past decade, but if I had to pick one, I'd go with creativity. Logic without passion is just not enough for me.
 

Count Igor

New member
May 5, 2010
1,782
0
0
Sentox6 said:
Count Igor said:
Well... I'm sort of in between.
Which is good, as I can't choose between Medicine and Acting.
I rock at both, so don't put me down here. It's not fanciful talk.
Medicine's not a subject anyone really "rocks" at, you know.

People rock at things like playing the guitar. No one really rocks at diagnosing pancreatic cancer.

Anyway, I'd take intelligence. In an increasingly commercialised world, artistic individuals are more likely to be exploited than end up calling the shots.
I happen to be better at the subject OF medicine than something like... let's say Geography. I was better because I've looked it up a lot and read/been taught about it since I was young.
I seem to be rather good at it. And I would say Doctors do actually "Rock" at it. Unless it's all just guessing about what to give the patients.
 

FoolKiller

New member
Feb 8, 2008
2,409
0
0
This is incorrect. The best problem-solving ability comes from having creativity and thinking outside the box.
 

roostuf

New member
Dec 29, 2009
724
0
0
i personally believe i have an above average intellect, but i do know that im very creative and have artistic skill.
 

Chemical Alia

New member
Feb 1, 2011
1,658
0
0
I'm an artist, but I feel like I use logical ability/intelligence more than creativity. I don't think I'm especially creative, but I like to research and plan out my art. So both?