Canid117 said:
SakSak said:
Canid117 said:
So I am going to have to say that anything is technically possible it just probably isn't going to happen.
Yet another contender for my challenge:
Disprove logic, without using logic while at it (as otherwise it will end up being a circular argument that is proof of nothing).
If you deem this impossible, then not everything is possible.
Not impossible, Improbable. According to Quantum physics it is entirely possible for you to walk through a wall. Unfortunately for this to happen, the electromagnetic field generated by every atom in your body (which is a lot of individual electromagnetic fields) would have to glitch out and not interact with the electromagnetic field generated by the atoms in the wall which is also a lot of individual electromagnetic fields. That combined with the improbability of a single one of your atoms passing through a wall makes it very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very ,very... very,very,very... very, very unlikely.
Quantum Mechanics does not extend to concepts.
I argue that it is impossible, even in theory, anywhere at any time by anyone/anything, to disprove logic.
Because the attempt would by necessity need to include logic at some point.
Even if only at the phase of claiming "Because of X, logic is disproven." Because this phrase itself relies on logic to be true. Thereby using that which it is attempting to disprove, as critical part of the proof.
QM has nothing to do with this. Because QM deals with subatomic particles, not logical absolutes or concepts.